METHODS FOR MANAGING ADULTS’ EDUCATION SPACE DEVELOPMENT UNDER CONDITIONS OF INTERACTION OF TRADITIONAL EDUCATIONAL ORGANIZATIONS AND NON-FORMAL COMMUNITIES
DOI: 10.23951/1609-624X-2019-8-119-127
Introduction. The article describes the basics of management of adult’s education space development under conditions of cooperation opportunities and resources of subjects of the formal and non-formal educational areas through the mechanism of formation of the educational space. The aim of the article is to analyze the ways of management of adult’s education development under conditions of the interaction of traditional educational organizations and non-formal educational communities (public associations). Research methods: analysis of literary sources, regulatory and legal documents of state, regional and municipal authorities; questioning; pedagogical included observation; analysis, comparison and synthesis of the know-how of public organizations; methods of statistical processing of the data. Results and discussion. The spheres of management are presented as a coordinated combination of traditional administrative approaches to education management, methodical and pedagogical methods of management, various forms of (self)management of public structures in multi-layer space. Indicators of the effectiveness of managing the interaction of traditional educational organizations and non-formal educational communities - public associations: a. the use of non-formal social practices of public structures as a source of the modernization, the development of formalized education. b. the formation of the willingness of the participants of the interaction to choice the educational and life ways, the severity of their value orientations, socialization. c. taking into account in the management of the specifics of the formalized educational network and the public initiatives of a certain territory. d. accounting for the design, management of the interaction network’s development the principles of openness, flexibility, integrity of space. Conclusion. The dynamics of adult’s education sphere is associated with the orientation of education on the student’s personality development, for example, through the mechanism of the educational space. It is bаsed on the network interaction of individual and group subjects, including educational organizations and public associations. In the content of the process of managing their interaction, the priorities are related to the development of pedagogical reality - the adult’s education space: supporting the conditions for the student’s creative development and their initiatives, engaging the public in the educational process, creating a legal framework, expanding and complicating relations with various sociocultural institutions, updating the content of education, etc. from the management of educational organizations and public associations to the management of cultural and educational programs processes of the research аrea.
Keywords: adult’s education space, networking, educational resources, the ways of management of adult’s education space development, non-formal education
References:
1. Knowles M. Andragogy in Action: Applying Modern Principles of Adult Learning. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass,1984.
2. Cross К. Р. Classroom research: helping professors learn more about teaching and learning, in Peter Seldin (ed.) How Administrators Can Improve Teaching. San Francisco, CA, Jossey-Bass, 1990. Pp. 122–142.
3. Lindeman Е. С. The Meaning of Adult Education, New York: New Republic. Republished in a new edition in 1989 by The Oklahoma Research Center for Continuing Professional and Higher Education, 1926. URL: http://www.infed.org/thinkers/et-lind.htm
4. Mezirow J. Transformative Dimensions of Adult Learning. San Francisco, CA, Jossey-Bass, 1991. Pp. 168–169.
5. Mezirov J. Learning as Transformation: Critical Perspectives on a Theory in Progress. San Francisco, Jossey Bass, 2000. Pp. 3–33.
6. Selivanova N. L. Predposylki sozdaniya perspektivnykh modeley vospitaniya [Prerequisites for the creation of promising models of upbringing]. Sibirskiy pedagogicheskiy zhurnal – Siberian Pedagogical Journal, 2013, no. 3, рр. 25–29 (in Russian).
7. Ponomarev R. E. Obrazovatel’noye prostranstvo kak osnovopolagayushcheye ponyatiye teorii obrazovaniya [Educational space as a fundamental concept of the theory of education]. Pedagogicheskoye obrazovaniye i nauka, 2003, no. 1, рр. 29–31 (in Russian).
8. Gustokashina L. A. Upravleniye sozdaniyem obrazovatel’nogo prostranstva gorodskogo rayona [Management of the creation of the educational space of the urban area]. Vospitatel’noye prostranstvo kak ob’’yekt pedagogicheskogo issledovaniya [Educational space as an object of pedagogical research]. Kaluga, 2000. Рр. 175–181 (in Russian).
9. Adamskiy A. I. Model’ setevogo vzaimodeystviya [Networking model of interaction]. Upravleniye shkoloy, 2002, no. 4 (in Russian). URL: http://upr.lseptember.rU/2002/04/2.htm (accessed 25 June 2018).
10. Obrazovatel’noye sobytiye kak resurs soorganizatsii i kooperatsii deyatel’nosti sub’’yektov obrazovatel’nogo protsessa: iz opyta raboty regional’noy innovatsionnoy ploshchadki departamenta obrazovaniya Yaroslavskoy oblasti v 2012 godu [Educational event as a resource for coorganization and cooperation of activities of subjects of the educational process: from the experience of the regional innovation site of the Department of Education of the Yaroslavl Region in 2012]. Rybinsk, MOU DPO “Informatsionno-obrazovatel’nyy tsentr” Publ., 2012. 34 р. (in Russian).
11. Alekseyev V. N. Setevoye vzaimodeystviye sub’’yektov obrazovatel’noy deyatel’nosti kak usloviye formirovaniya grazhdanskoy kompetentnosti obuchayushchikhsya [Network interaction of subjects of educational activity as a condition for the formation of students’ civic competence]. Sovremennyye problemy nauki i obrazovaniya – Modern Problems of Science and Education, 2013, no. 6 (in Russian). URL: http://www.scienceeducation.ru/ru/article/view?id= 11703 (accessed 4 June 2019).
12. Remorenko I. M. Na putyakh k setevomu upravleniyu [On the paths to network management]. Sovmestnyy vypusk gazety “Sel’skaya shkola so vsekh storon” i zhurnala “Na putyakh k novoy shkole”, 2003, no. 3 (in Russian). URL: http://altruism.ru/sengine.cgi/5/7/8/12/8 (accessed 14 September 2018).
13. Orlikhina N. E. Razvitiye regional’noy sistemy setevoy organizatsii dopolnitel’nogo professional’nogo obrazovaniya uchiteley. Avtoref. dis. dokt. ped. nauk [Development of the regional system of the network organization of additional professional education of teachers. Abstract of thesis of doct. of ped. sci.]. Moscow, 2006. 38 р. (in Russian).
14. Petrov A. N. Menedzhment: v 2 ch. Ch. 2: uchebnik dlya akademicheskogo bakalavriata [Management: in 2 parts. Part 2: textbook for academic undergraduate]. Moscow, Yurayt Publ., 2017. 496 р. (in Russian). URL: https://biblio-online.ru/bcode/400622 (accessed 4 June 2019).
15. Kostina T. I., Molokanova N. V., Bityukova G. N., Kudryashova N. A. Setevoye vzaimodeystviye pedagogov doshkol’nykh uchrezhdeniy kak innovatsionnaya model’ organizatsii metodicheskoy deyatel’nosti [Network interaction of preschool teachers as an innovative model for organizing methodical activities]. Molodoy uchenyy, 2016, no. 23 (127), рр. 56–59 (in Russian). URL https://moluch.ru/archive/127/35348/ (accessed 2 June 2019).
16. Aliyeva L. V. Pedagogicheskoye upravleniye – usloviye realizatsii perspektivnykh modeley vneshkol’nogo vospitaniya detey [Pedagogical management is a condition for the implementation of promising out-of-school education for children]. Sibirskiy pedagogicheskiy zhurnal – Siberian Pedagogical Journal, 2015, no. 2, рр. 31–36 (in Russian).
17. Smorgunov L. V. Setevaya metodologiya issledovaniya politiki [Network methodology of policy research]. Politicheskiy analiz: doklady Tsentra empiricheskikh politicheskikh issledovaniy SPbGU. pod red. G. P. Artemova [Political analysis: reports of the Center for Empirical Political Studies, St. Petersburg State University. Ed. by G. P. Artemova]. Moscow, 2007, vol. 2, рр. 25–43 (in Russian).
18. Ilakavichus M. R. Raznovozrastnyye praktiki neformal’nogo obrazovaniya kak pokazatel’ formirovaniya grazhdanskogo obshchestva [Non-age practices of non-formal education as an indicator of the formation of civil society]. Obshchestvo, kul’tura, lichnost’. Aktual’nyye problemy sotsial’nogumanitarnogo znaniya: matetialy konf. [Society, culture, personality. Actual problems of social and humanitarian knowledge: conference proceedings]. Saint Petersburg, 2014. Pр. 45–49 (in Russian).
19. Ilakavichus M. R. Teoreticheskiye osnovy vzaimodeystviya formal’nogo i neformal’nogo obrazovaniya vzroslykh. Avtoref. dis. dokt. ped. nauk [Theoretical foundations of the interaction of formal and non-formal adult education. Abstract of thesis doct. ped. nauk]. Moscow, 2018. 40 р. (in Russian).
Issue: 8, 2019
Series of issue: Issue 8
Rubric: TEACHER EDUCATION
Pages: 119 — 127
Downloads: 695