ABOUT INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM OF BULGARIAN DOSTOEVSKY SOCIETY “THE ANTHROPOLOGY OF DOSTOYEVSKY. THE MAN AS A PROBLEM AND A SUBJECT OF REFLECTION IN THE DOSTOYEVSKY’S WORLD” (SOFIA, 23–26 OCTOBER 2018)
DOI: 10.23951/1609-624X-2019-6-122-131
Inroduction. The Anthropology of Dostoevsky is a complex polyaspect subject, the study of which is possible with the use of cross-disciplinary approach of various branches of humanitarian knowledge: literary criticism, linguistics, philosophy, theology, psychology, psychoanalysis, anthropology. The aim of this work is to analyze the current trends of development of modern science about Dostoevsky and systematization of the international experience of studying of his creative anthropology. Material and methods. The research material is the speeches, theses and summaries of reports of participants of the international symposium “Anthropology of Dostoevsky. Man as a problem and a subject of reflection in Dostoevsky’s world”. The research methods are analytical and descriptive, expert estimation, expert analysis. Results and discussion. Expert opinions of scientists from 16 countries of the world who presented their reports at the international symposium, allowed to consider three leading problematic and thematic directions systemically: the anthropology of Dostoevsky in the light of philosophical anthropology and the European culture of the XX century; a problem of the person in the novel The Idiot. In connection with 150-year anniversary of the novel The Idiot the special attention was devoted to discussion of features of its screen version within a round table “The Idiot of Dostoevsky and The Idiot of A. Kurosawa”. Conclusion. The value of the reports presented within the problematic and thematic directions of a symposium consisted in the researchers’ ability to keep the unique spirit of creativity of Dostoyevsky, his deep understanding of the person presented in various forms of literary writing, philosophical ideas and truly psychological interpretations.
Keywords: F. M. Dostoevsky, anthropology, man, personality, values, spirituality, freedom, eschatology, historiosophy, existential consciousness, religion, Orthodoxy, people, Bulgarian Dostoevsky society, A. Kurosawa
References:
1. Dimitrov E. Dostoyevskiy v Bolgarii (1971–2011) (Bibliografi ya) [Dostoevsky in Bulgaria (1971–2011) (Bibliography)]. Dostoyevskiy. Materialy i issledovaniya. T. 20 [Dostoevsky. Materials and research.Vol. 20]. Saint Petersburg, Nestor-istoriya Publ., 2013. Pp. 480–488 (in Russian).
2. Dimitrov E. Bezmolviye u Dostoyevskogo [Silence according to Dostoevsky]. Dostoyevskiy i sovremennost’: tezisy vystupleniy na “Staroruskikh chteniyakh”. Ch. 1 [Dostoevsky and present: theses of performances on “Starorusky readings”. Part 1]. Novgorod, 1991. Pp. 48–52 (in Russian).
3. Dimitrov E. Ontopoetika Dostoyevskogo [Dostoevsky’s ontopoetics]. Dostoyevskiy v smene epokh i pokoleniy: sbornik materialov Mezhdunarodnoy nauchnoy konferentsii (Omsk, 13–15 oktyabrya 2011) [Dostoevsky in change of eras and generations: collection of materials of the International scientifi c conference (Omsk, 13–15 October 2011)]. Ed. O. S. Issers, Е. А. Akel’kina. Omsk, 2011. Pp. 28–34 (in Russian).
4. Asenov S. Bitie i ots’’stvie. Dostoevsky i opit’t za sm’’rtta [Being and absence. Dostoevsky was also tried for death]. Sofi a, Universitetsko izdatelstvo “Sv. Klimeyn Orkhidski” Publ., 2014. 310 p. (in Bulgarian).
5. Kasari R. Kupecheskiy dom: istoricheskaya deystvitel’nost’ i simvol u Dostoyevskogo i Leskova [Merchant house: historical reality and a symbol at Dostoevsky and Leskov]. Dostoyevskiy. Materialy i issledovaniya. T. VII [Dostoyevsky. Materials and researches. Vol. VII]. Leningrad, 1988. Pp. 87–92 (in Russian).
6. Casari R. Di un motivo architettonico-spaziale in Dostoevskij. Le vaste prigioni della mente [From an architectural-spatial motive in Dostoevsky. Extensive prisons of the mind]. Studi slavistici offerti a Alessandro Ivanov nel suo 70° compleanno [Slavic studies proposed to Alexander Ivanov in his 70 years old]. Padova, 1992. Pр. 26–33.
7. Casari R. “Prekrasnaya skazka” ob Amure i Psikheye v tvorchestve Dostoyevskogo [“The fi ne tale” of L’Amour et Psyché in Dostoevsky’s creativity].“Na mezhe mezh Golosom i Ekhom”: sb. statey v chest’ T. V. Tsiv’yan [“On a boundary between Voice and the Echo”: the collection of articles in honor of T. V. Tsivyan]. Мoscow, 2007. Pp. 165–173 (in Russian).
8. Gacheva A. G. “Nam ne dano predugadat’, Kak slovo nashe otzovetsya...” Dostoyevskiy i Tyutchev [“To us it is not allowed to foresee As our word will respond...” Dostoevsky and Tyutchev]. Мoscow, Institute of World Literature Publ., 2004. 640 p. (in Russian).
9. Gacheva A. G. Tsarstvo Bozhiye na zemle v ponimanii F. M. Dostoyevskogo [The Kingdom of God on the earth in F. M. Dostoevsky’s understanding]. Evangel’skiy tekst v russkoy literature XVIII–XX vekov: Tsitata, reministsentsiya, motiv, syuzhet, zhanr. Sbornik nauchnykh trudov [The evangelical text in the Russian literature of the 18–20th centuries: Quote, reminiscence, motive, plot, genre: collection of scientifi c works]. Petrozavodsk, 2005, no. 4, pp. 312–327 (in Russian).
10. Dostoyevskiy i khristianstvo [Dostoevsky and Christianity]. Ed. Zhordi Morilyas. Saint Petersburg, Dmitry Bulanin Publ., 2015. 251 p. (in Russian).
11. Morilyas Z. Utverzhdeniye i otritsaniye voli k zhizni u Raskol’nikova. A. Shopengauer i F. M. Dostoyevskiy [Statement and denial of will to live at Raskolnikov. A. Schopenhauer and F. M. Dostoyevsky]. Dostoyevskiy i mirovaya kul’tura. Al’manakh [Dostoyevsky and world culture. Almanac]. Ed. К. А. Stepanyan. Мoscow, 2012. No. 28. Pp. 87–113 (in Russian).
12. Arsentyeva N., Morilyas Z. Bibliografi ya perevodov, retseptsii i nauchnogo izucheniya zhizni i tvorchestva Dostoyevskogo v Ispanii [The bibliography of the translations, reception and scientifi c studying of life and Dostoyevsky’s creativity in Spain]. Dostoyevskiy: materialy i issledovaniya. T. 20 [Dostoevsky: material and research works. Vol. 20]. Saint Petersburg, Nestor-istoriya Publ., 2013. Pp. 305–328 (in Russian).
13. Garstka Ch. Arthur Möeller van den Bruck und die erste deutsche Gesamtausgabe der Werke Dostojewskis im Piper-Verlag 1906–1919: eine Bestandsaufnahme sämtlicher Vorbemerkungen und Einführungen von Arthur Möeller van den Bruck und Dmitri Mereschkowski unter Nutzung unveröffentlichter Briefe der Übersetzerin E. K. Rahsin. Mit ausführlicher Bibliographie [Arthur Möller van den Brook and the fi rst German full publication of Dostoevsky’s works in Piper Verlag 1906–1919: a list of all preliminary remarks and introductions by Arthur Möller van den Brook and Dmitry Mereshkovsky using unpublished letters from the translator E. K. Rahsin. With a detailed bibliography. Foreword by Horst-Jürgen Gerigck]. Frankfurt am Main [u.a.], Geleitwort von Horst-Jürgen Gerigk Publ., 1998. 164 p.
14. Kinosita T. Vospriyatiye i izucheniye tvorchestva Dostoyevskogo v Yaponii za posledniye 40 let v svete istorii vospriyatiya tvorchestva pisatelya s kontsa XIX v. [Perception and studying of creativity of Dostoyevsky in Japan for the last 40 years in the light of history of perception of works of the writer since the end of the 19th century]. Dostoyevskiy: materialy i issledovaniya. T. 20 [Dostoevsky: material and research works. Vol. 20]. Saint Petersburg, Nestor-istoriya Publ., 2013. Pp. 194–219 (in Russian).
15. Kinosita T. Antropologiya i poetika tvorchestva F. M. Dostoyevskogo: sb. st. [Anthropology and poetics of creativity of F. M. Dostoevsky. Collection of articles]. Ed. V. Tunimanov. Saint Petersburg, Serebryanyy vek Publ., 2005. 208 p. (in Russian).
16. Kinosita T. Po povodu ponyatiya “realizm v vysshem smysle” F. M. Dostoevskogo. V aspekte otnosheniya poetiki i antropologii [Concerning the concept “realism in the highest sense” of F. M. Dostoevsky. In the aspect of relation of poetics and anthropology]. Dostoyevskiy i mirovaya kul’tura. Al’manakh [Dostoyevsky and world culture. Almanac]. Ed. К. А. Stepanyan. Мoscow, 2009. No. 25. Pp. 103–113 (in Russian).
17. Dimitrov E. Osnovnoy vopros antropologii Dostoyevskogo – “Kak chelovek vozmozhen?” [The main question of anthropology of Dostoyevsky – “How is a man possible?”]. URL: https://philologist.livejournal.com/10003962.html (accessed 12 May 2019) (in Russian).
18. Dostoyevskiy F. M. Polnoye sobraniye sochineniy: v 30 t. [Complete works: 30 volumes]. Leningrad, Nauka Publ., 1972–1986 (in Russian).
19. Mezhdunarodnyy simpozium “Antropologiya Dostoyevskogo. Chelovek kak problema i ob’’ekt izobrazheniya v mire Dostoyevskogo”. Tezisy i annotatsii dokladov [International symposium “The Anthropology of Dostoevsky. The man as a problem and as a subject of refl ection in the Dostoyevsky’s world”. Absracts]. Sofi a, Bulgarian Dostoyevsky society Publ., 2018. 80 p. (in Russian, in Bulgarian).
( 459.61 kB ) 
( 451.94 kB )
Issue: 6, 2019
Series of issue: Issue 6
Rubric: REVIEWS
Pages: 122 — 131
Downloads: 730