Tomsk State Pedagogical University Bulletin
RU EN






Today: 30.01.2023
Home Issues 2018 Year Issue №6 “FACT” AND “FACTUAL” IN THE TV HISTORICAL-COGNITIVE DISCOURSE IN TELEVSION PROGRAMMS “NEFAKT”
  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Bulletin Archive
    • 2023 Year
      • Issue №1
    • 2022 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 2021 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 2020 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 2019 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
    • 2018 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
    • 2017 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2016 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2015 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2014 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2013 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
      • Issue №13
    • 2012 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
      • Issue №13
    • 2011 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
      • Issue №13
    • 2010 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2009 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2008 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
    • 2007 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
    • 2006 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2005 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
    • 2004 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
    • 2003 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
    • 2002 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
    • 2001 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
    • 2000 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
    • 1999 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
    • 1998 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 1997 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
  • Rating
  • Search
  • News
  • Editorial Board
  • Information for Authors
  • Review Procedure
  • Information for Readers
  • Editor’s Publisher Ethics
  • Contacts
  • Manuscript submission
  • Received articles
  • Accepted articles
  • Subscribe
  • Service Entrance

Journal TSPU

vestnik.tspu.edu.ru
praxema.tspu.edu.ru
ling.tspu.edu.ru
npo.tspu.edu.ru
edujournal.tspu.edu.ru

TSPU Bulletin is a peer-reviewed open-access scientific journal.

E-LIBRARY (РИНЦ)
Ulrich's Periodicals Directory
Google Scholar
European reference index for the humanities and the social sciences (erih plus)
DOAJ (Directory of Open Access Journals)
Search by Author
- Not selected -
  • - Not selected -
Яндекс.Метрика

“FACT” AND “FACTUAL” IN THE TV HISTORICAL-COGNITIVE DISCOURSE IN TELEVSION PROGRAMMS “NEFAKT”

Mozgova E. S.

DOI: 10.23951/1609-624X-2018-6-77-80

Information About Author:

Mozgova E. S., Tomsk State University (pr. Lenina, 36, Tomsk, Russian Federation, 634050). E-mail: evgeniya_b90@mail.ru

Today television is the main mass media. It can show a huge audience not only current events, but also recreate the past. Therefore, today television is actively used to create television programs that broadcast historical knowledge. The author of this article examines one of the most conceptual aspect of historical popularization on TV – the conception of fact as a semantic category. The analysis bases on several examples o f television program “Nefact” (“Not a fact”), broadcasted on the Russian television channel “Zvezda”. It is a modern television product, which explores different events and phenomena in the point of view of the concept of fact and factual. In the focus of the article is lexical units “fact” and “not fact”, its semantic and functional meanings, and different ways of using in text structure of the TV-program. At the end of the article the author concludes that this lexical units can denote a reliable piece of information; 2) serve as a marker of doubt; 3) give a starting point to journalistic investigation and determine its structure; 4) serve as confirmation or refutation of information, being used at the conclusion of the investigation; 5) perform a nominative function, defining a specific style of presentation of the material. The author examines communicative potential of the test unit in journalistic materials and its importance in the promotion of knowledge.

Keywords: fact, factual, lexical meaning, connotation

References:

1. Deyk T. A. van. K opredeleniyu diskursa [To the defi nition of discourse]. Leningrad, Seydzh pablikeyshns Publ., 1998. 284 p. (in Russian).

2. Nikolaeva T. M. Kratkiy slovar’ terminov lingvistiki [A brief glossary of terms of linguistics]. Мoscow, Progress Publ., 1978. 480 p.(in Russian).

3. Slovar’ russkogo yazyka: v 4 t. [Dictionary of the Russian language: in 4 volumes]. AN USSR, In-t rus. yaz.; pod red. A. P. Evgen’evoy. 3 iz. [Academy of Sciences of USSR, Institute of the Russian Language. Ed. by A. P. Evgen’yeva. 3rd edition]. Мoscow, Russkiy yazyk Publ., 1985–1988. P. 48 (in Russian).

4. Efremova T. F. Novyy slovar’ russkogo yazyka. Tolkovo-slovoobrazovatel’nyy [New dictionary of the Russian language. Interpretative and wordbuilding] (in Russian). URL: http://dic.academic.ru/dic.nsf/efremova/277442/%D0%BD%D0%B5 (accessed 14 September 2016).

5. Nefakt: televizionnaya programma [Not the fact: TV program]. Telekanal “Zvezda” [TV channel “Zvezda”]. 2016, issue 26 (in Russian). URL: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QNq3mT76St4 (accessed 25 July 2016).

6. Kuznetsov G. V., Tsvik V. L., Yurovskiy A. Ya. Televizionnaya zhurnalistika [Television journalism]. Moscow, MSU Publ., 2002. 286 p. (in Russian).

7. Nefakt: televizionnaya programma [Not the fact: TV program]. Telekanal “Zvezda” [TV channel “Zvezda”]. 2016, issue 18 (in Russian). URL: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xClCRm3jz7c (accessed 25 July 2016).

8. Bolotnova N. S. Filologicheskiy analiz teksta: uchebnoye posobiye [Philological analysis of the text: textbook]. Мoscow, Flinta: Nauka Publ., 2007. 520 p. (in Russian).

9. Nefakt: televizionnaya programma [Not the fact: TV program]. Telekanal “Zvezda” [TV channel “Zvezda”]. 2015, issue 14 (in Russian). URL: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=M6OdMrmGIXg (accessed 14 August 2016).

10. Kovaleva L. M., Bogdanova S. U., Semenova T. I. Slovo v predlozhenii [The word in the sentence] (in Russian). URL: http://books.house/russkiyyazyik/predmetnyie-imena-pozitsii-emanticheskogo-35481.html (accessed 12 August 2016).

mozgova_e._s._77_80_6_195_2018.pdf ( 435.14 kB ) mozgova_e._s._77_80_6_195_2018.zip ( 429.5 kB )

Issue: 6, 2018

Series of issue: Issue 6

Rubric: COGNITIVE-DISCURSIVE RESEARCH IN MODERN LINGUISTICS

Pages: 77 — 80

Downloads: 487

For citation:


© 2023 Tomsk State Pedagogical University Bulletin

Development and support: Network Project Laboratory TSPU