Tomsk State Pedagogical University Bulletin
RU EN






Today: 30.01.2023
Home Issues 2017 Year Issue №7 SPEECH GENRE “BOW” IN A. P. CHEKHOV’S LETTERS
  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Bulletin Archive
    • 2023 Year
      • Issue №1
    • 2022 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 2021 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 2020 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 2019 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
    • 2018 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
    • 2017 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2016 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2015 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2014 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2013 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
      • Issue №13
    • 2012 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
      • Issue №13
    • 2011 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
      • Issue №13
    • 2010 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2009 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2008 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
    • 2007 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
    • 2006 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2005 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
    • 2004 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
    • 2003 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
    • 2002 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
    • 2001 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
    • 2000 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
    • 1999 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
    • 1998 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 1997 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
  • Rating
  • Search
  • News
  • Editorial Board
  • Information for Authors
  • Review Procedure
  • Information for Readers
  • Editor’s Publisher Ethics
  • Contacts
  • Manuscript submission
  • Received articles
  • Accepted articles
  • Subscribe
  • Service Entrance

Journal TSPU

vestnik.tspu.edu.ru
praxema.tspu.edu.ru
ling.tspu.edu.ru
npo.tspu.edu.ru
edujournal.tspu.edu.ru

TSPU Bulletin is a peer-reviewed open-access scientific journal.

E-LIBRARY (РИНЦ)
Ulrich's Periodicals Directory
Google Scholar
European reference index for the humanities and the social sciences (erih plus)
DOAJ (Directory of Open Access Journals)
Search by Author
- Not selected -
  • - Not selected -
Яндекс.Метрика

SPEECH GENRE “BOW” IN A. P. CHEKHOV’S LETTERS

Nguyen Thi Le Q.

DOI: 10.23951/1609-624X-2017-7-87-93

Information About Author:

Nguyen Thi Le Quyen, Tomsk State University (pr. Lenina, 34, Tomsk, Russian Federation, 634050). E-mail: lequyen13@gmail.com

The article is devoted to the analysis of the etiquette of the speech genre «bow» in the epistolary discourse of Anton Pavlovich Chekhov. Substantiates the validity of allocation of etiquette speech genre “bow,” which is widely used in the Chekhov’s letters. The description of etiquette speech genre is held with regard to its main constitutive parameters of speech genres (following the T.V.Shmeleva’s Model of speech genre): the communicative purpose, the image of the addresser, the image of the addressee, the factor of the eventful past, the factor of the eventful future, structural and linguistic peculiarities. The “bow” in Chekhov’s letters is a method of transmitting an indirect recipient (recipients of the bow) through the direct recipient of letters. The communicative purpose of the speech genre “bow” is an expression of a respectful and kind attitude of the addresser to his addressees. With this speech genre, the author shows himself as a person who knows the conventional speech etiquette (including correspondence etiquette) and simultaneously supports, maintains contacts and good relations with people, regardless of temporal and spatial factors. Speech genre “bow” as one of the most consumed etiquette genres in Chekhov’s letters, written during the period 1892-1894 years, generally performs the phatic function. The features of Chekhov’s linguistic expression in the speech genre “bow” give his epistolary communication emotions that determine the overall positive communication background.

Keywords: etiquette, etiquette speech genre, genre “bow”, constitutive features, direct recipients, indirect recipients, phatic communication

References:

1. Sternin I. A. Russkiy rechevoy etiket [Russian speech etiquette]. Voronhez, 1996 (in Russian).

2. Formanovskaya N. I. Vy skazali: «Zdravstvuyte!» [You said: Hello!]. Moscow, Znaniye Publ., 1989 (in Russian).

3. Slovar’ po etike. Pod red. I. S. Kona [Dictionary of Ethics. Under the editorship of I.S. Kon]. Moscow, Politizdat Publ., 1981 (in Russian).

4. Yuzhin V. I. Polnaya entsyklopediya etiketa [Complete encyclopedia of etiquette]. Moscow, RIPOL klassik Pibl., 2007 (in Russian).

5. Balakay A. G. Tolkovy slovar’ russkogo rechevogo etiketa [Dictionary of Russian speech etiquette]. Moscow, 2004 (in Russian).

6. Tarasenko T. V. Etiketnye rechevye zhanry v russkoy rechi: blagodarnost’, izvineniye, pozdravleniye, soboleznovaniye. Dis. kand. filol. nauk [Etiquette speech genres in Russian speech: gratitude, apology, congratulations, condolences. Diss. of cand. philol. sci.]. Krasnoyarsk, 1999 (in Russian).

7. Demeshkina T. A. Teorya dialektnogo vyskazyvanya. Aspekty semantiki [The theory of dialectal utterance. Aspects of semantics]. Tomsk, 2000 (in Russian).

8. Kuryanovich A. V. Kommunikativnye aspekty slova v epistolyarnom discurse M. I. Tsvetaevoy. Dis. kand. filol. nauk [Communicative aspects of the word in the M. I. Tsvetaeva’s epistolary discourse. Diss. of cand. philol. sci.]. Tomsk, 2001. (in Russian).

9. Belunova N. I. Elitarnaya rechevaya kul’tura i eyo osobenosti [The elite speech culture and its features]. Saint-Pertersburg, SPbSU Publ., 2000 (in Russian).

10. Akishina A. A., Kano H., Аkishina T. K. Zhesty i mimika v russkoy rechi. Lingvostranovedcheskij slovar’ [Gestures and facial expressions in the Russian language. The encyclopaedic dictionary]. Moscow, Russkiy yazyk Publ., 1991 (in Russian).

11. Bol’shoy akademichesky slovar’ russkogo yazyka. Tom 18: Podlets - Poroy [Big academic dictionary of the Russian language. Vol. 18]. Moscow–Saint Petersburg, Nauka Publ., 2011 (in Russian).

12. Zayarnaya O. M. Yazyk tela v khudozhestvennom discurse E. I. Nosova [Body Language in the E. I. Nosov’s literary discourse] (in Russian). URL: http://econf.rae.ru/article/5881 (accessed: 20.02.2017).

13. Chekhov A. P. Polnoye sobraniye sochineniy i pisem: v 30 t. Pis’ma v 12 t. [Complete collection of essays and letters: in 30 vol. Letters: in 12 vol.]. Moscow, Nauka Publ., 1973. 589 p. (in Russian).

14. Shmeleva T. V. Model’ rechevogo zhanra [Model of speech genre]. Saratov, 1997. Vol. 1. Pp. 88–98 (in Russian).

15. Golub I. B. Stilistika russkogo yazyka [The style of the Russian language]. Moscow, Rol’f Publ., 2001 (in Russian).

16. Kreidlin G. E. Neverbal’naya semiotika [Nonverbal semiotics]. Moscow, Novoye literaturnoye obozreniye Publ., 2002 (in Russian).

nguyen_thi_le_q._87_93_7_184_2017.pdf ( 437.74 kB ) nguyen_thi_le_q._87_93_7_184_2017.zip ( 428.47 kB )

Issue: 7, 2017

Series of issue: Issue 7

Rubric: ACTUAL PROBLEMS OF COGNITIVE-DISCURSIVE AND CULTURAL LINGUISTICS

Pages: 87 — 93

Downloads: 564

For citation:


© 2023 Tomsk State Pedagogical University Bulletin

Development and support: Network Project Laboratory TSPU