Tomsk State Pedagogical University Bulletin
RU EN






Today: 04.10.2023
Home Issues 2017 Year Issue №3 METHODICAL COMMENT AS A MEANS OF DEVELOPMENT AND EVALUATION OF PROFESSIONAL COMPETENCE OF A FOREIGN LANGUAGE TEACHER
  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Bulletin Archive
    • 2023 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
    • 2022 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 2021 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 2020 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 2019 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
    • 2018 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
    • 2017 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2016 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2015 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2014 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2013 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
      • Issue №13
    • 2012 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
      • Issue №13
    • 2011 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
      • Issue №13
    • 2010 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2009 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2008 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
    • 2007 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
    • 2006 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2005 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
    • 2004 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
    • 2003 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
    • 2002 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
    • 2001 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
    • 2000 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
    • 1999 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
    • 1998 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 1997 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
  • Rating
  • Search
  • News
  • Editorial Board
  • Information for Authors
  • Review Procedure
  • Information for Readers
  • Editor’s Publisher Ethics
  • Contacts
  • Manuscript submission
  • Received articles
  • Accepted articles
  • Subscribe
  • Service Entrance
vestnik.tspu.edu.ru
praxema.tspu.edu.ru
ling.tspu.edu.ru
npo.tspu.edu.ru
edujournal.tspu.edu.ru

TSPU Bulletin is a peer-reviewed open-access scientific journal.

E-LIBRARY (РИНЦ)
Ulrich's Periodicals Directory
Google Scholar
European reference index for the humanities and the social sciences (erih plus)
DOAJ (Directory of Open Access Journals)
Search by Author
- Not selected -
  • - Not selected -
Яндекс.Метрика

METHODICAL COMMENT AS A MEANS OF DEVELOPMENT AND EVALUATION OF PROFESSIONAL COMPETENCE OF A FOREIGN LANGUAGE TEACHER

Igna Olga Nikolaevna

DOI: 10.23951/1609-624X-2017-3-75-79

Information About Author:

Igna O. N., Tomsk State Pedagogical University (ul. Kievskaya, 60, Tomsk, Russia, 634061). E-mail: onigna@tspu.edu.ru

In the scientific-methodical aspect the methodical comment exists in two basic forms: as a type of information-methodical products and as an expert evaluation. Both forms are significant and necessary for theoreticians and practitioners of the educational process. In this article methodical comment is examined as a means of development and evaluation of the professional competence of the teacher of a foreign language. The most appropriate base (informative material) for methodical comments in the course of teachers’ training is proposed (methodical statements, quotes from scientific and educational literature, a description of the methods, techniques, methods, forms of teaching, educational activity results). Examples of tasks from foreign textbooks, which can be considered analogous to methodological commentary and author’s examples of methodological comments are provided. Such tasks were developed by the author of this publication for National Students’ Olympiads on the methods of foreign language teaching “Foreign language (English) and methods of teaching it” (Tomsk, Tomsk State Pedagogical University, 2016), and their use has fully justified their scientific and methodological value as a form of evaluation of professional competence of foreign language teachers. The criteria of evaluation of the methodical comments are given (pithiness, validity and completeness of the comment, actuality of the comment in terms of matching the realities of modern language education, knowledge of professional terminology, examples as a support to the comment, observance of time limits).

Keywords: methodical comment, professional competence, means of development of professional competence, foreign language, foreign language teacher

References:

1. Metodicheskiy kommentariy [Methodical comment]. Otkrytyy klass. Setevye obrazovatel’nye soobshchestva [Open class. Networked learning communities] (in Russian). URL: http://www.openclass.ru/node/69762?page=1 (accessed 25.11.2016).

2. Doff A. Teach English. A training course for teachers: teacher’s workbook – the nineteenth printing. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, The British council, 2005. 139 p.

3. Parrott M. Tasks for language teachers. 12-th printing. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 2006. 325 p.

4. Solovova E. N. Praktikum k bazovomu kursu metodiki obucheniya inostrannym yazykam: uchebnoye posobiye dlya vuzov [Workshop to the basic course of methods of foreign language teaching: a textbook for high schools]. Moscow, AST, Astrel Publ., 2008. 192 p. (in Russian).

5. Andreevskaya-Levenstern L. S., Mikhaylova O. E. Metodika prepodavaniya frantsuzskogo yazyka v sredney shkole [Methods of teaching French in secondary school]. Moscow, Uchpedgiz Publ., 1958. 422 p. (in Russian).

6. Pervye shagi v professiyu uchitelya inostrannogo yazyka. K. I. Salomatov, T. A. Volkova, T. N. Dobronravova et al. [The first steps in the profession of the teacher of a foreign language. K. I. Salomatov, T. A. Volkova, T. N. Dobronravova et al.]. Leningrad, Prosveshcheniye Publ., 1979. 175 p. (in Russian).

7. Passov E. I., Kuzovleva N. E. Urok inostrannogo yazyka [The foreign language lesson]. Rostov-on-Don, Feniks Publ.; Moscow, Glossa-Press Pabl., 2010. 640 p. (in Russian).

8. Igna O. N. Sovremennye klassifikatsii uchebnykh metodicheskikh zadach [Modern classification of educational methodological problems]. Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta – Tomsk State University Journal, 2010, no. 338, pp. 177–182 (in Russian).

9. Vshivtseva E. I., Igna O. N. Formirovaniye nauchno-metodicheskoy kompetentnosti budushchego uchitelya inostrannogo yazyka [The formation of science-methodical competence of a future foreign language teacher]. Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo pedagogicheskogo universiteta – TSPU Bulletin, 2011, vol. 9 (111), pp. 199–203 (in Russian).

10. Igna O. N. O tipakh vuzovskikh olimpiadnykh zadaniy po metodike obucheniya inostrannym yazykam [About the types of tasks for university Olympiads on the methods of foreign language teaching]. Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo pedagogicheskogo universiteta – TSPU Bulletin, 2016, vol. 11 (176), pp. 105–108 (in Russian).

igna_o._n._75_79_3_180_2017.pdf ( 376.59 kB ) igna_o._n._75_79_3_180_2017.zip ( 368.93 kB )

Issue: 3, 2017

Series of issue: Issue 3

Rubric: CURRENT ISSUES OF LINGUODIDACTICS

Pages: 75 — 79

Downloads: 725

For citation:


© 2023 Tomsk State Pedagogical University Bulletin

Development and support: Network Project Laboratory TSPU