Tomsk State Pedagogical University Bulletin
RU EN






Today: 04.10.2023
Home Issues 2017 Year Issue №3 FUNCTIONAL AND SEMANTIC PECULIARITIES OF SEMI-SUFFIXES AND SUFFIXES SYNONYMOUS TO THEM IN MODERN ENGLISH
  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Bulletin Archive
    • 2023 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
    • 2022 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 2021 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 2020 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 2019 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
    • 2018 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
    • 2017 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2016 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2015 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2014 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2013 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
      • Issue №13
    • 2012 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
      • Issue №13
    • 2011 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
      • Issue №13
    • 2010 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2009 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2008 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
    • 2007 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
    • 2006 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2005 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
    • 2004 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
    • 2003 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
    • 2002 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
    • 2001 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
    • 2000 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
    • 1999 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
    • 1998 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 1997 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
  • Rating
  • Search
  • News
  • Editorial Board
  • Information for Authors
  • Review Procedure
  • Information for Readers
  • Editor’s Publisher Ethics
  • Contacts
  • Manuscript submission
  • Received articles
  • Accepted articles
  • Subscribe
  • Service Entrance
vestnik.tspu.edu.ru
praxema.tspu.edu.ru
ling.tspu.edu.ru
npo.tspu.edu.ru
edujournal.tspu.edu.ru

TSPU Bulletin is a peer-reviewed open-access scientific journal.

E-LIBRARY (РИНЦ)
Ulrich's Periodicals Directory
Google Scholar
European reference index for the humanities and the social sciences (erih plus)
DOAJ (Directory of Open Access Journals)
Search by Author
- Not selected -
  • - Not selected -
Яндекс.Метрика

FUNCTIONAL AND SEMANTIC PECULIARITIES OF SEMI-SUFFIXES AND SUFFIXES SYNONYMOUS TO THEM IN MODERN ENGLISH

Dyachkova Ekaterina Sergeyevna

DOI: 10.23951/1609-624X-2017-3-33-37

Information About Author:

Dyachkova E. S., Altay State Pedagogical University (ul. Molodezhnaya, 55, Barnaul, Altayskiy kray, Russia, 656031). E-mail: kate_dyachkova@mail.ru

The article dwells on the functional and semantic peculiarities of the so-called semi-suffixational elements and suffixes that have similar meaning. As a result of the comparative analysis of synonymous semi-suffixes and suffixes, the synonymous sets of semi-suffixes correlated with the corresponding sets of suffixes were revealed. It was stated that despite of being functionally and semantically close, possessing common distributional characteristics and sharing to a certain extent the same area of application, these word-building elements can’t be considered as the identical ones. The reason of it is hidden in the specific nature of the meanings of semi-suffixes: the semantics of the latest is not as wide in its denotative part but it shows more variety in its significative part than the semantics of the correlated suffixes. Moreover, suffixes demonstrate a higher degree of generalization of the lexical meaning than semi-suffixes. The author comes to the conclusion about a wider significative meaning of a semi-suffix capable of uniting more semantic characteristics and conceptional relations than the semantics of a suffix; denotative meaning of semi-suffix appeared to be more narrow and limited than the one of a suffix. Thus, significative meaning of semi-suffix contains a greater number of conceptual, semantic features and pragmatic relations.

Keywords: semi-suffix, suffix, generalization of meaning, synonymy, polycemy, significative meaning, denotative meaning

References:

1. Marchand H. The Categories and Types of Present-Day English Word-Formation. Munchen, Wilhelm Fink, 1969. 427 p.

2. Stepanova M. D. Leksikologiya sovremennogo nemetskogo yazyka = Lexikologie der deutchen Gegenwartssprache [Lexicology of modern German language]. Moscow, Akademiya Publ., 2003. 256 p. (in Russian).

3. Arnold I. V. Leksikologiya sovremennogo angliyskogo yazyka = The English Word [Lexicology of modern English language]. Moskow, Vysshaya shkola Publ., 1986. 295 p. (in Russian).

4. Kubryakova E. S. Chto takoye slovoobrazovaniye? [What is the derivation?]. Moscow, Nauka Publ., 1965. 264 p. (in Russian).

5. Kosareva N. V. Lingvisticheskiy status obrazovaniy s elementami tipa -man v sovremennom angliyskom yazyke. Avtoref. dis. kand. filol. nauk [Linguistic status of entities with -man-type elements in modern English language. Abstract of thesis cand. philol. sci.]. Kiev, 1979. 22 p. (in Russian).

6. Zabotkina V. I. Novaya leksika angliyskogo yazyka [New English vocabulary]. Moscow, Vysshaya shkola Publ., 1991. 126 p. (in Russian).

7. Dyachkova E. S. Polusuffiksatsiya kak aktivnyy protsess v sovremennom angliyskom yazyke [Polysuffixation as an active process in modern English]. Vestnik razvitiya nauki i obrazovaniya – Bulletin of the development of science and education, 2010, no. 2, pp. 80–84 (in Russian).

8. CIDE – Cambridge International Dictionary of English. P. Procter (ed.). Cambridge University Press, 2001. 1774 p.

9. Wentworth H., Flexner S. B. DAS – Dictionary of American Slang. Toronto, 1967. 674 p.

10. LDCE – Longman Dictionary of Contemporary English. The Complete Guide to Written and Spoken English. 3d ed. A. Gadsby (ed. dir.). London, Longman Group Ltd., 1995. 1668 p.

11. MED – Macmillan English Dictionary for Advanced Learners. International Student Edition. M. Rundell (ed.). Oxford, Macmillan Publishers Ltd., 2002. 1692 p.

12. Capel A. English Guides. Word Formation. University of Birmingham, Harper Collins Publishers, 2003. 336 p.

13. Zyatkovskaya R. G. Suffiksal’naya sistema sovremennogo angliyskogo yazyka [Suffixational system of modern English]. Moscow, Vysshaya shkola Publ., 1971. 186 p. (in Russian).

14. Leont’eva S. F. Otritsatel’nye affiksy v sovremennom angliyskom yazyke [Negative affixes in modern English]. Moscow, Vysshaya shkola Publ., 1974. 103 p. (in Russian).

15. Karashchuk P. M. Slovoobrazovaniye angliyskogo yazyka [English word building]. Moscow, Vysshaya shkola Publ., 1977. 303 p. (in Russian).

16. Zhluktenko Yu. A. Angliyskiye neologizmy [English neologisms]. Kiev, Naukova dumka Publ., 1983. 172 p. (in Russian).

dyachkova_e._s._33_37_3_180_2017.pdf ( 360.4 kB ) dyachkova_e._s._33_37_3_180_2017.zip ( 352.22 kB )

Issue: 3, 2017

Series of issue: Issue 3

Rubric: CURRENT PROBLEMS OF GERMANIC STUDIES

Pages: 33 — 37

Downloads: 881

For citation:


© 2023 Tomsk State Pedagogical University Bulletin

Development and support: Network Project Laboratory TSPU