Tomsk State Pedagogical University Bulletin
RU EN






Today: 12.12.2023
Home Issues 2017 Year Issue №11 COGNITIVE ANALYSIS OF ANTHROPOMORPHIC NOMINATIONS OF THE NOTIONAL ZONE “FACE” IN THE OIL AND GAS TERMINOLOGY
  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Bulletin Archive
    • 2023 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 2022 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 2021 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 2020 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 2019 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
    • 2018 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
    • 2017 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2016 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2015 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2014 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2013 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
      • Issue №13
    • 2012 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
      • Issue №13
    • 2011 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
      • Issue №13
    • 2010 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2009 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2008 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
    • 2007 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
    • 2006 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2005 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
    • 2004 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
    • 2003 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
    • 2002 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
    • 2001 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
    • 2000 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
    • 1999 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
    • 1998 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 1997 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
  • Rating
  • Search
  • News
  • Editorial Board
  • Information for Authors
  • Review Procedure
  • Information for Readers
  • Editor’s Publisher Ethics
  • Contacts
  • Manuscript submission
  • Received articles
  • Accepted articles
  • Subscribe
  • Service Entrance
vestnik.tspu.edu.ru
praxema.tspu.edu.ru
ling.tspu.edu.ru
npo.tspu.edu.ru
edujournal.tspu.edu.ru

TSPU Bulletin is a peer-reviewed open-access scientific journal.

E-LIBRARY (РИНЦ)
Ulrich's Periodicals Directory
Google Scholar
European reference index for the humanities and the social sciences (erih plus)
DOAJ (Directory of Open Access Journals)
Search by Author
- Not selected -
  • - Not selected -
Яндекс.Метрика

COGNITIVE ANALYSIS OF ANTHROPOMORPHIC NOMINATIONS OF THE NOTIONAL ZONE “FACE” IN THE OIL AND GAS TERMINOLOGY

Manina Antonina Rifkhatovna

DOI: 10.23951/1609-624X-2017-11-96-99

Information About Author:

Manina A. R., Bashkir State University (ul. Zaki Validi, 32, Ufa, Republic of Bashkortostan, Russian Federation, 450074). E-mail: bogdana-mama@mail.ru

This article is devoted to the analysis of anthropomorphic metaphors in the English terminological system of oil and gas industry. The theoretical basis relies on the cognitive approach to metaphor, mostly on the conceptual theory of metaphor. The author describes the cognitive scheme “the oil and gas industry is a human being”. It was revealed that anthropomorphic metaphorization is one of the most effective ways of term-forming in the sphere of oil and gas. In the result of metaphorization, new terms are formed based on a cognitive mapping of lexical units, referring to the structure of human body, to a specific branch of study regarding external or functional similarities between the source domain and the target domain. The author considers the metaphorical shifting of anatomical structure of the human body, namely human face and the organs located on it, which proved to be an important source of metaphorization in creating English oil and gas terms. The analysis of the two constituent parts of this notional zone and revealing the cognitive structure schemes of their elements made it possible to bring to light the grounds of metaphoric shifting, as well as the modes of perception used in the process of metaphorization.

Keywords: oil and gas terminology, anthropomorphic metaphor, the notional zone, cognitive structures, modes of perception in the process of metaphorization

References:

1. Golovanova E. I. Vvedeniye v kognitivnoye terminovedeniye [Introduction to cognitive terminology]. Moscow, Flinta, Nauka Publ., 2011. 224 p. (in Russian).

2. Deeva A. I. Soderzhatel’naya struktura i kharakternye osobennosti metaforicheskogo fragmenta neftegazovoy terminologicheskoy sistemy (na materiale angliyskogo yazyka) [Content-related structure and specifi c features of the metaphorical fragment of oil and gas terminological system (on the material of the English language)]. Filologicheskiye nauki. Voprosy teorii i praktiki – Philological Sciences. Issues of Theory and Practice, 2014, vol. I, no. 10 (40), pp. 46–53 (in Russian).

3. Dudetskaya S. G. Metaforizatsiya kak sposob terminoobrazovaniya: na materiale angliyskoy terminologii cherepno-chelyustno-litsevoy khirurgii i stomatologii. Dis. kand. fi lol. nauk [Metaphorization as the way of term-forming: on the material of the English terminology of craniomaxillofacial surgery and stomatology. Diss. cand. of phil. sci.]. Samara, 2007. 240 p. (in Russian).

4. Ovsyannikova V. V. Metaforicheskiye modeli v nauchnom geologicheskom diskurse. Avtoref. dis. kand. fi lol. nauk. [Metaphorical models in the scientifi c geological discourse. Abstract of thesis cand. of phil. sci.]. Tomsk, 2010. 23 p. (in Russian).

5. Teliya V. N. Metaforizatsiya i eye rol’ v sozdanii yazykovoy kartiny mira [Metaphorization and its role in creation of the linguistic picture of the world]. Rol’ chelovecheskogo faktora v yazyke. Yazyk i kartina mira – The role of human factor in the language. The language and the picture of the world. Moscow, Nauka Publ., 1988. Pp. 173–203 (in Russian).

6. Arutyunova N. D. Yazyk i mir cheloveka [Language and the world of human]. Moscow, Yazyki russkoy kul’tury Publ., 1999. 896 p. (in Russian)

7. Rezanova Z. I. Metaforicheskoye modelirovaniye: bazovye kontseptual’nye modeli i klyuchevye modeli teksta i diskursa [Metaphorical modeling: basic conceptual models and key models of text and discourse]. Kartina mira: yazyk, literatura, kul’tura – The Picture of the World: Language, Literature, Culture, 2006, vol. 2, pp. 67–76 (in Russian).

8. Aznabaeva L. A. Antropotsentrizm v myshlenii i yazyke [Anthropocentrism in the thinking and in the language]. Ufa, RIC BSU Publ., 2010. 124 p. (in Russian).

9. Lyons W. C. Air and gas drilling manual 3rd ed. Burlington, MA, 2009. 777 p.

10. Cement Heads and Casing Hardware. Schlumberger JET Manual 08. Well Services Training & Development, IPC., 2006. 100 p.

11. Treating Equipment. Schlumberger JET Manual 01. Well Services Training & Development, IPC., 2005. 60 p.

manina_a._r._96_99_11_188_2017.pdf ( 425.9 kB ) manina_a._r._96_99_11_188_2017.zip ( 420.42 kB )

Issue: 11, 2017

Series of issue: Issue 11

Rubric: GERMANIC LANGUAGES

Pages: 96 — 99

Downloads: 574

For citation:


© 2023 Tomsk State Pedagogical University Bulletin

Development and support: Network Project Laboratory TSPU