Tomsk State Pedagogical University Bulletin
RU EN






Today: 01.10.2023
Home Issues 2016 Year Issue №7 THE NEGATIVE ASSESSMENT IN JOURNALISM: THE BASIC TOOLS FOR CREATING INDIRECTION
  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Bulletin Archive
    • 2023 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
    • 2022 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 2021 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 2020 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 2019 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
    • 2018 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
    • 2017 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2016 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2015 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2014 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2013 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
      • Issue №13
    • 2012 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
      • Issue №13
    • 2011 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
      • Issue №13
    • 2010 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2009 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2008 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
    • 2007 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
    • 2006 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2005 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
    • 2004 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
    • 2003 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
    • 2002 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
    • 2001 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
    • 2000 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
    • 1999 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
    • 1998 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 1997 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
  • Rating
  • Search
  • News
  • Editorial Board
  • Information for Authors
  • Review Procedure
  • Information for Readers
  • Editor’s Publisher Ethics
  • Contacts
  • Manuscript submission
  • Received articles
  • Accepted articles
  • Subscribe
  • Service Entrance
vestnik.tspu.edu.ru
praxema.tspu.edu.ru
ling.tspu.edu.ru
npo.tspu.edu.ru
edujournal.tspu.edu.ru

TSPU Bulletin is a peer-reviewed open-access scientific journal.

E-LIBRARY (РИНЦ)
Ulrich's Periodicals Directory
Google Scholar
European reference index for the humanities and the social sciences (erih plus)
DOAJ (Directory of Open Access Journals)
Search by Author
- Not selected -
  • - Not selected -
Яндекс.Метрика

THE NEGATIVE ASSESSMENT IN JOURNALISM: THE BASIC TOOLS FOR CREATING INDIRECTION

Nikitina Larisa Borisovna

Information About Author:

There are considered the main means of indirect expression of human negative assessment in journalistic texts: representatives, maxims, interrogative constructions. Statements- representatives describe a state of affairs, the assessment of which is displayed through its correlation with the existing in society notions of good and bad. Statements- maxims reflect typical for national-cultural community stereotypes about the world and the man and perform the role of indirectly expressed authoritative assessment in a journalistic text. Interrogatives tatements concealing the assertion encourage the recipient to look for an answer to the question and to conclude an evaluative meaning. Indirection of evaluative intension expression provides noncategorical tonality of statements.

Keywords: journalism, negative assessment, indirection, categoricalness

References:

1. Dement'ev V. V. Nepryamaya kommunikatsiya i eye zhanry [Indirect communication and its genres]. Saratov, SSU Publ., 2000. 248 p. (in Russian).

2. Fedosyuk M. Yu. Neyavnye sposoby peredachi informatsii v tekste: uchebnoye posobiye po spetskursu [Implicit ways of information transfer in text. Tutorial for special study course]. Moscow, MGPI Publ., 1988. 83 p. (in Russian).

3. Dement'ev V. V. Nepryamaya kommunikatsiya [Indirect communication]. Moscow, Gnozis Publ., 2006. 376 p. (in Russian).

4. Searle J. R. Kosvennye rechevye akty [Indirect speech acts]. Novoye v zarubezhnoy lingvistike. Vyp. 17. Teoriya rechevykh aktov [The New in Foreign Linguistics. Iss.17. Theory of speech acts]. Moscow, Progress Publ., 1986, pp.195–222. (in Russian).

5. Searle J. R., Vanderveken D. Osnovnye ponyatiya ischisleniya rechevykh aktov [Basic Concepts of Speech Acts Enumeration]. Novoye v zarubezhnoy lingvistike. Vyp. XVIII. Logicheskiy analiz estestvennogo yazyka [The New in Foreign Linguistics. Iss. 18. Logical Analysis of Natural Language]. Moscow, Progress Publ., 1986, pp. 242–263 (in Russian).

nikitina_l._b._113_118_7_172_2016.pdf ( 422.37 kB ) nikitina_l._b._113_118_7_172_2016.zip ( 416.17 kB )

Issue: 7, 2016

Series of issue: Issue 7

Rubric: ACTUAL PROBLEMS OF RUSSIAN STUDIES

Pages: 113 — 118

Downloads: 485

For citation:


© 2023 Tomsk State Pedagogical University Bulletin

Development and support: Network Project Laboratory TSPU