Tomsk State Pedagogical University Bulletin
RU EN






Today: 06.02.2023
Home Issues 2016 Year Issue №2 SYNTACTIC INCOMPLETENESS VS COMMUNICATIVE INNUENDO: TO THE PROBLEM OF TEXT AMBIGUITY RESOLUTION IN DIALOGIC COMMUNICATION DISCOURSE
  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Bulletin Archive
    • 2023 Year
      • Issue №1
    • 2022 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 2021 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 2020 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 2019 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
    • 2018 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
    • 2017 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2016 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2015 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2014 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2013 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
      • Issue №13
    • 2012 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
      • Issue №13
    • 2011 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
      • Issue №13
    • 2010 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2009 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2008 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
    • 2007 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
    • 2006 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2005 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
    • 2004 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
    • 2003 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
    • 2002 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
    • 2001 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
    • 2000 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
    • 1999 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
    • 1998 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 1997 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
  • Rating
  • Search
  • News
  • Editorial Board
  • Information for Authors
  • Review Procedure
  • Information for Readers
  • Editor’s Publisher Ethics
  • Contacts
  • Manuscript submission
  • Received articles
  • Accepted articles
  • Subscribe
  • Service Entrance

Journal TSPU

vestnik.tspu.edu.ru
praxema.tspu.edu.ru
ling.tspu.edu.ru
npo.tspu.edu.ru
edujournal.tspu.edu.ru

TSPU Bulletin is a peer-reviewed open-access scientific journal.

E-LIBRARY (РИНЦ)
Ulrich's Periodicals Directory
Google Scholar
European reference index for the humanities and the social sciences (erih plus)
DOAJ (Directory of Open Access Journals)
Search by Author
- Not selected -
  • - Not selected -
Яндекс.Метрика

SYNTACTIC INCOMPLETENESS VS COMMUNICATIVE INNUENDO: TO THE PROBLEM OF TEXT AMBIGUITY RESOLUTION IN DIALOGIC COMMUNICATION DISCOURSE

Belskaya N. S.

Information About Author:

The article deals with the methodological approach to the distinction between syntactic incompleteness and communicative innuendo in the dialogic texts of business correspondence as the way to text ambiguity resolution in forensic linguistics. Syntactic incompleteness is a reflection of some cognitive processes underlying the fragmentation of interaction discourse. Innuendo is here understood as the special type of speech act where important components of the meaning are skipped by the speaker. Special attention is paid to the time reference, the correlation between syntactic incompleteness and semantic completeness of the sentence in a situation, the information content of Question-Answer communication, the contextual meanings of communicative and syntactic text organization.

Keywords: forensic linguistics, text ambiguity, business correspondence, dialogic communication, syntactic incompleteness, communicative innuendo, communicative and syntactic organization of statement

References:

1. Solov'eva E. Peredacha pryamykh i kosvennykh smyslov posredstvom usechennosti [Transmission of direct and indirect text meanings by incompleteness of the sentence]. Nauchno-kul'turologicheskiy zhurnal Relga – Scientifi c and Cultural Journal Relga. 25.06.2001. no. 12 [66] (in Russian) URL: http://www.relga.ru/Environ/ WebObjects/tgu-www.woa/wa/Main?level1=main&level2=articles&textid=710 (accessed 10 October 2015) (in Russian).

2. Russkaya grammatika. T II. Sintaksis [Russian Grammar. V. II]. Moscow, Nauka Publ., 1980. 717 p. (in Russian).

3. Valgina N. S. Sovremennyy russkiy yazyk: Sintaksis: Uchebnik [Modern Russian Language. Textbook]. Moscow, Vysshaya shkola Publ., 2003. 416 p. (in Russian).

4. Kozhina M. N. Stilistika russkogo yazyka [Stylistic of Russian Language]. Moscow, Flinta: Nauka Publ., 2008. 464 p. (in Russian).

5. Nikolenkova N. V. Nepolnota predlozheniya. Prosto ili slozhno? [Syntactic incompleteness of the sentence: Is it simple or hard?] URL: http://www.portal-slovo.ru/philology/37399.php (accessed 10 October 2015) (in Russian).

6. Natsional'nyy standart Rossiyskoy Federatsii. GOST R 53103–2008 “Deyatel'nost' vystavochno-yarmarochnaya. Terminy i opredeleniya” [National standard of the Russian Federation. GOST R 53103–2008 “Exhibition and trade fair activities. Terms and Defi nitions”]. Moscow, Standartinform Publ., 2009. 19 p. (in Russian).

7. Federal'nyy zakon ot 23.11.2009 N 261-FZ (red. ot 13.07.2015) “Ob energosberezhenii i o povyshenii energeticheskoy effektivnosti i o vnesenii izmeneniy v otdel'nye zakonodatel'nye akty Rossiyskoy Federatsii” [The Federal law on 23.11.2009 no. 261-FZ “On energy saving and improvement of energy effi ciency and on Amendments to Certain Legislative Acts of Russia”]. “Konsul'tant Plyus”: pravovoy sayt – ConsultantPlus: legal website. URL: http://www.consultant.ru/ document/ cons_doc_LAW_93978/ (accessed 10 October 2015) (in Russian).

belskaya_n._s._124_128_2_167_2016.pdf ( 430.17 kB ) belskaya_n._s._124_128_2_167_2016.zip ( 424.16 kB )

Issue: 2, 2016

Series of issue: Issue 2

Rubric: ACTUAL PROBLEMS OF RUSSIAN LINGUISTICS AND COMMUNICATIVE STYLISTICS OF THE TEXT

Pages: 124 — 128

Downloads: 533

For citation:


© 2023 Tomsk State Pedagogical University Bulletin

Development and support: Network Project Laboratory TSPU