Tomsk State Pedagogical University Bulletin
RU EN






Today: 06.02.2023
Home Issues 2016 Year Issue №2 CONCEPT “DESTINY”: FEATURES OF REPRESENTATION IN POLISH LINGVOCULTURE
  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Bulletin Archive
    • 2023 Year
      • Issue №1
    • 2022 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 2021 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 2020 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 2019 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
    • 2018 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
    • 2017 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2016 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2015 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2014 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2013 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
      • Issue №13
    • 2012 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
      • Issue №13
    • 2011 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
      • Issue №13
    • 2010 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2009 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2008 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
    • 2007 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
    • 2006 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2005 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
    • 2004 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
    • 2003 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
    • 2002 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
    • 2001 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
    • 2000 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
    • 1999 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
    • 1998 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 1997 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
  • Rating
  • Search
  • News
  • Editorial Board
  • Information for Authors
  • Review Procedure
  • Information for Readers
  • Editor’s Publisher Ethics
  • Contacts
  • Manuscript submission
  • Received articles
  • Accepted articles
  • Subscribe
  • Service Entrance

Journal TSPU

vestnik.tspu.edu.ru
praxema.tspu.edu.ru
ling.tspu.edu.ru
npo.tspu.edu.ru
edujournal.tspu.edu.ru

TSPU Bulletin is a peer-reviewed open-access scientific journal.

E-LIBRARY (РИНЦ)
Ulrich's Periodicals Directory
Google Scholar
European reference index for the humanities and the social sciences (erih plus)
DOAJ (Directory of Open Access Journals)
Search by Author
- Not selected -
  • - Not selected -
Яндекс.Метрика

CONCEPT “DESTINY”: FEATURES OF REPRESENTATION IN POLISH LINGVOCULTURE

Deyeva N. V.

Information About Author:

Concept “los” (“destiny”) as a key in the Polish culture has many lexical representation. “Destiny” in Polish is the life, the existence of someone or something; future, sequence of events; the supreme regulatory beginning. Destiny is thought of as contradictory, ambivalent beginning. It is able to help or hinder. Carriers of the Polish language are ambivalent in their relation to the destiny. Presence of the destiny may either be approved or denied. Poles have different views on the nature of destiny. On the one hand, destiny is presented as unchangeable and predefined from above. On the other, there is a view that it is created during the life (existence), and, for example, a person can have a significant influence on it. Metaphorically in Polish destiny is represented by the signs of person, connecting or disconnecting, gracious or formidable beginning.

Keywords: concept, lingvoculture, Polish language, lexical representation, conceptual metaphor

References:

1. Pimenov E. A. Issledovaniye kontsepta TRAUER “PECHAL” posredstvom sinonimicheskogo ryada [Study of concept TRAUER “SORROW” by means of synonymic row]. Ethnohermeneutik und antropologie / Ed. E. A. Pimenov, M. V. Pimenova. Landau, Verlag Empirische Padagogik Publ., 2004, pp. 89–94 (in Russian).

2. Pimenova M. V. Obraznye i simvolicheskiye priznaki luny v russkoy kontseptosfere [Figurative and symbolic signs of the moon in the Russian contceptosphere]. Kontsept i kul'tura [Concept and Culture]. Kemerovo, Kuzbassvuzizdat Publ., 2008, pp. 294–303 (in Russian).

3. Słownik języka polskiego [Polish dictionary] (in Polish). URL: http://sjp.pwn.pl/slownik (accessed 20 June 2014).

4. Brukner A. Słownik etymologiczny języka polskiego [Etymological dictionary of the Polish language]. Warszaw, Wiedza Powszechna Publ., 1985. 806 p. (in Polish).

5. Szyjewski A. Ciało i dusza w wierzeniach dawnych Słowian [Body and soul in the beliefs of ancient Slavs]. Krakow, WAM Publ., 2003. 268 p. (in Polish).

6. Ozhegov S. I., Shvedova N. Yu. Tolkovyy slovar' sovremennogo russkogo yazyka [Explanatory dictionary of modern Russian language]. Moscow, Az Publ., 1995. 928 p. (in Russian).

7. Elektroniczny słownik języka polskiego XVII i XVIII wieku [Electronic Dictionary of the Polish language XVII and XVIII centuries] (in Polish). URL: http://sxvii.pl/ (accessed 1 May 2015).

8. Słownik synonimów i antonimów [Dictionary of synonyms and antonyms]. Ed. M. Pawlus. Krakow, Drukarnia Narodowa Publ., 2002. 484 p. (in Polish).

9. Wielki słownik języka polskiego [Large Dictionary of the Polish language] (in Polish). URL: http://www.wsjp.pl/ (accessed 1 May 2015).

10. Bol'shoy latinsko-russkiy slovar' [Large Latin-Russian Dictionary] (in Russian). URL: http://linguaeterna.com (accessed 7 July 2015).

11. Słownik frazeologiczny języka polskiego [Polish language phrasebook] (in Polish). URL: http://www.edupedia.pl/ (accessed 1 May 2015).

12. Gurevich A. Ya. Kategorii srednevekovoy kul'tury [Category of the medieval culture]. Moscow, Iskusstvo Publ., 1984. 350 p. (in Russian).

13. Korpus języka polskiego [Corpus of the Polish language] (in Polish). URL: http://korpus.pwn.pl/ (accessed 20 June 2014).

deyeva_n._v._31_37_2_167_2016.pdf ( 462.87 kB ) deyeva_n._v._31_37_2_167_2016.zip ( 456.39 kB )

Issue: 2, 2016

Series of issue: Issue 2

Rubric: COGNITIVE-DISCURSIVE LINGUISTICS AND CULTURAL LINGUISTICS

Pages: 31 — 37

Downloads: 549

For citation:


© 2023 Tomsk State Pedagogical University Bulletin

Development and support: Network Project Laboratory TSPU