Tomsk State Pedagogical University Bulletin
RU EN






Today: 01.04.2023
Home Issues 2015 Year Issue №6 V. S. SOLOVYOV’S “WHOLE KNOWLEDGE” IN THE CONTEXT OF THE WORLD THOUGHT (HOLISTIC AND HERMENEUTIC ASPECTS)
  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Bulletin Archive
    • 2023 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
    • 2022 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 2021 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 2020 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 2019 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
    • 2018 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
    • 2017 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2016 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2015 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2014 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2013 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
      • Issue №13
    • 2012 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
      • Issue №13
    • 2011 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
      • Issue №13
    • 2010 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2009 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2008 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
    • 2007 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
    • 2006 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2005 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
    • 2004 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
    • 2003 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
    • 2002 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
    • 2001 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
    • 2000 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
    • 1999 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
    • 1998 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 1997 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
  • Rating
  • Search
  • News
  • Editorial Board
  • Information for Authors
  • Review Procedure
  • Information for Readers
  • Editor’s Publisher Ethics
  • Contacts
  • Manuscript submission
  • Received articles
  • Accepted articles
  • Subscribe
  • Service Entrance
vestnik.tspu.edu.ru
praxema.tspu.edu.ru
ling.tspu.edu.ru
npo.tspu.edu.ru
edujournal.tspu.edu.ru

TSPU Bulletin is a peer-reviewed open-access scientific journal.

E-LIBRARY (РИНЦ)
Ulrich's Periodicals Directory
Google Scholar
European reference index for the humanities and the social sciences (erih plus)
DOAJ (Directory of Open Access Journals)
Search by Author
- Not selected -
  • - Not selected -
Яндекс.Метрика

V. S. SOLOVYOV’S “WHOLE KNOWLEDGE” IN THE CONTEXT OF THE WORLD THOUGHT (HOLISTIC AND HERMENEUTIC ASPECTS)

Semenyuk Anton Pavlovich

Information About Author:

This article reveals the sources of Vl. Solovyov’s whole knowledge problem (the myth of Return and its early philosophical interpretation, Gnostic teachings, the apophatical doctrine about humility / silence of the mind, naturalphilosophical, organicistic, monistic doctrines of Modern European Philosophy, Slavophilism). Approves the typological community of Solovyov’s epistemology with holistic teachings in the history of thought. Based on the theoretical work materials the author reveals the polysemy and multidimensionality of the concept of “whole knowledge”, the author proves the thesis that Solovyov´s teaching of whole knowledge plays the holistic ideacomplex. Тhе article compares the Solovyov´s doctrine of whole knowledge and the conception of the hermeneutical circle of German thinkers. Тhe thesis according to which Solovyov’s doctrine is closest in spirit to Heidegger’s interpretation of understanding is proved. It is concluded that with all the similarities of two conceptions, the Solovyov’s “whole knowledge” is deprived of hermeneutical dimension

Keywords: gnoseology of V. S. Solovyov, whole knowledge, holism, hermeneutical circle, understanding, Russian religious philosophy

References:

1. Semenyuk A. P. Gnoseologicheskiye konceptsii russkoy religioznoy fi losofi i v kontekste problemy ponimaniya [The gnoseological conceptions of Russian religious philosophy in the context of problem understanding]. Tomsk, TML-Press Publ., 2012. 244 p. (in Russian).

2. Lovejoy Arthur O. The Revolt against Dualism: an Inquiry concerning the Existence of Ideas. London, George Allen & Unwin Ltd., 1930. Pp. xii + 325.

3. Kireevskiy I. V. Izbrannye stat’i [Select Articles]. Moscow, Sovremennik Publ.,1984. 383 p. (in Russian).

4. Solov’ev V. S. Sochineniya: v 2 t. [Writings in 2 vols.]. Moscow, Mysl’ Publ., 1988. V. 1. 823 p. 1989. V. 2. 736 p. (in Russian).

5. Gadamer G.-G. Aktual’nost’ prekrasnogo [The Relevance of the Beautiful]. Moscow, Iskusstvo Publ., 1991. 367 p. (in Russian).

6. Heydegger M. Bytiye i vremya [Being and Time]. Moscow, Ad Mаrginem Publ., 1997. XI+452 p. (in Russian).

semenyuk_a._p._263_268_6_159_2015.pdf ( 450.54 kB ) semenyuk_a._p._263_268_6_159_2015.zip ( 443.99 kB )

Issue: 6, 2015

Series of issue: Issue 6

Rubric: SCIENTIFIC REPORTS

Pages: 263 — 268

Downloads: 499

For citation:


© 2023 Tomsk State Pedagogical University Bulletin

Development and support: Network Project Laboratory TSPU