Tomsk State Pedagogical University Bulletin
RU EN






Today: 01.04.2023
Home Issues 2015 Year Issue №6 GENRE ORIGINALITY OF “THE LIFE OF THE RIGHTEOUS ELDER FEODOR OF TOMSK”: THE PROBLEM OF THE MODERN HAGIOGRAPHIC CANON
  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Bulletin Archive
    • 2023 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
    • 2022 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 2021 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 2020 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 2019 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
    • 2018 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
    • 2017 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2016 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2015 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2014 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2013 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
      • Issue №13
    • 2012 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
      • Issue №13
    • 2011 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
      • Issue №13
    • 2010 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2009 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2008 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
    • 2007 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
    • 2006 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2005 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
    • 2004 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
    • 2003 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
    • 2002 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
    • 2001 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
    • 2000 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
    • 1999 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
    • 1998 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 1997 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
  • Rating
  • Search
  • News
  • Editorial Board
  • Information for Authors
  • Review Procedure
  • Information for Readers
  • Editor’s Publisher Ethics
  • Contacts
  • Manuscript submission
  • Received articles
  • Accepted articles
  • Subscribe
  • Service Entrance
vestnik.tspu.edu.ru
praxema.tspu.edu.ru
ling.tspu.edu.ru
npo.tspu.edu.ru
edujournal.tspu.edu.ru

TSPU Bulletin is a peer-reviewed open-access scientific journal.

E-LIBRARY (РИНЦ)
Ulrich's Periodicals Directory
Google Scholar
European reference index for the humanities and the social sciences (erih plus)
DOAJ (Directory of Open Access Journals)
Search by Author
- Not selected -
  • - Not selected -
Яндекс.Метрика

GENRE ORIGINALITY OF “THE LIFE OF THE RIGHTEOUS ELDER FEODOR OF TOMSK”: THE PROBLEM OF THE MODERN HAGIOGRAPHIC CANON

Makarenko Evgeniya Konstantinovna

Information About Author:

The presented article is a part of study on the review of the modern genre identity hagiographic canon material on “The Life of the righteous elder Feodor of Tomsk” composed by abbot Siluanus (Vyurovym) (now bishop Kolpashevsky and Strezhevskoy). The considered work reflects the current stage of evolution of hagiographic genre and meet modern canonical genre and stylistic requirements of objectivity, faktologichnosti, conciseness, and the tendency to transfer the individual characteristic of the ascetic and not focus on agiotip. The greatest attention in this paper is given to studying the life of style, narrative principles of copyright and artistic means of creating an image of a saint.

Keywords: hagiography, prologue being, holy, righteous, martyr, composition, author, style, canon, Orthodoxy

References:

1. Zhitiye svyatogo pravednogo startsa Fedora Tomskogo. Sost. Igumen Siluan (Vyurov). Izdaniye tret’e (dopolnenoye) [Life of St. Feodore of Tomsk righteous elder. Comp. Abbot Silvanus (Vyurov). Third Edition (Revised)]. Tomsk, Bogoroditse-Aleksievskiy monastyr’ Publ., 2010. 36 р. (in Russian).

2. Korman B. O. Itogi i perspektivy izucheniya problemy avtora [Results and prospects of studying the problem of the author]. Izbrannye trudy po teorii I istorii literatury [Selected works on the theory and history of literature] Izhevsk, Udmurd. un-t Publ., 1992. 236 p. (in Russian).

3. Bakhtin M. M. Problema rechevykh zhanrov. Sobranie sochineniy [The problem of speech genres. Collection of writings]. Moskow, Russkiye slovari Publ., 1996. Vol. 5: Works 1940–1960. Pp. 159–206 (in Russian).

4. Kovalev K. Zhitiye ili biografi ya? O zhanrakh sovremennoy agiografi i i literaturno-istoricheskoy publitsistiki [Life or biography? About genres of contemporary literary hagiography and history of journalism]. URL: http://www.kkovalev.ru/Savva_Tsercov_vestnik.htm (accessed 15 January 2015) (in Russian).

5. Velikiye svyatye. “On vsekh prostil…”. Imperator Nikolay II. Tserkov’ o Tsarskoy Sem’e. Zhitiye i stradaniya Svyatykh Tsarstvennykh strastoterptsev Nikolaya II I Ego Sem’i. Materialy Sinodalnoy Komissii po kanonizatsii svyatykh Russkoy pravoslavnoy Tserkvi [Great saints. “It’s all just...”. Emperor Nicholas II. Church about the royal family. Life and suffering of the Holy Royal Passion Nicholas II and his family. Materials of Synodal Commission on the Causes of Saints Russian Orthodox Church]. St. Petersburg, Neva Publ., Moscow, Olma-Press Grand Publ., 2002. 222 p. (in Russian).

6. Prokhvatilova O. A. Ekstralingvisticheskie parametry i yazykovye kharakteristiki religioznogo stilya [Extralinguistic and linguistic characteristics of religious identity]. Vestnik Volgogradskogo gos. un-ta – Bulletin of Volgograd State University, 2006, ser. 2. Linguistics, vol. 5, pp. 19–26. URL: http://www.pandia.ru/text/77/275/19115.php (accessed 15 January 2015) (in Russian).

7. Likhachev D. S. Poetika drevnerusskoy literatury [Poetics of Old Russian literature]. Moscow, Nauka Publ., 1979. 376 p. (in Russian).

8. Livshits A. L. Lokalnyy agiografi cheskiy text v istoriko-literaturnom kontekste XVII – serediny XVIII stoletiy (zhitiye Ierodiona Iloezerskogo). Diss. kand. fi lol. nauk [Local hagiographic text in historical and literary context of the mid XVII–XVIII century (life Herodion Iloezerskogo). Diss. cand. philol. sci.]. Tomsk, 2012. 297 p. (in Russian).

8. Likhachev D. S. Chelovek v literature Drevney Rusi [The man in the literature of ancient Russia]. Selected works: In 3 t. Leningrad, Hudozh. Literature Publ., 1987. Vol. 3. 520 p. (in Russian).

9. Makarenko E. K. Zhanrovoye svoeobraziye “Zhitiya svyatogo pravednogo startsa Feodora Tomskogo”: k probleme sovremennogo agiografi cheskogo kanona”. Chast’ I. [Genre originality of “The Life of the righteous Elder Theodore of Tomsk”: the problem of the modern canon of hagiographic. Part I]. Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo pedagogicheskogo universiteta – TSPU Bulletin, 2014, vol. 9 (150), рр. 114–120 (in Russian).

10. Grekova I. V. Evolutsiya agiografi cheskogo zhanra v funktsional’nom i stilisticheskom aspekte. Avtoref. diss. kand. fi lol. nauk [Evolution of the hagiographic genre in functional and stylistic aspects. Abstract of diss. cand. philol. sci.]. Kemerovo, 2014. 23 p. (in Russian).

makarenko_e._k._161_168_6_159_2015.pdf ( 476.55 kB ) makarenko_e._k._161_168_6_159_2015.zip ( 469.1 kB )

Issue: 6, 2015

Series of issue: Issue 6

Rubric: HAGIOGRAPHY. OLD RUSSIAN LITERATURE

Pages: 161 — 168

Downloads: 696

For citation:


© 2023 Tomsk State Pedagogical University Bulletin

Development and support: Network Project Laboratory TSPU