TRUTH PROBLEM IN THE CONTEXT OF INTERPRETATIONS OF QUANTUM LOGIC
The paper defends the thesis that analysis of truth problem in the context of interpretations of quantum logic allows to come to more general problem of the coherence between the scope of quantum mechanical and quantum logical studies on the basis of principle of the indiscernibility of identicals entered by G. Leibnitz and developed by S. Kripke. At the same time it’s revealed the prospect of elicitation of specifics of the relations between quantum mechanics and quantum logic in a context of modal expansions of quantum logic.
Keywords: principle of the indiscernibility of identical, quantum logic, model, interpretation
References:
1. Kulikov S. B. Prospects of development of interactions of quantum logic and quantum mechanics. Philosophical problems of information technologies and cyberspace, 2012, no. 2, pp. 4–17 (in Russian).
2. Kasavin I. T. Truth: eternal subject and modern challenges. Epistemology and philosophy of science, 2009, v. 20, no. 2, pp. 5–12 (in Russian).
3. Neumann von J. Mathematical bases of quantum mechanics. Moscow, Nauka Publ., 1964. 366 p. (in Russian).
4. Birkhoff G., Neumann von J. The Logic of Quantum Mechanics. Annals of Mathematics, 1936, vol. 37, pp. 823–843.
5. Dirac P. A. M. Principles of quantum mechanics. Moscow, Nauka Publ., 1979. 480 p. (in Russian).
6. Pechenkin A. A. Modal interpretation of quantum mechanics as “anti-collapse” interpretation. Philosophy of science, vol. 6, Moscow, IFRAN Publ., 2000, pp. 31–38. (in Russian).
7. Schrцdinger E. What is life? Physical aspect of living cell. Moscow – Izhevsk, Research center of regular and chaotic dynamic Publ., 2002. 92 p. (in Russian).
8. Zhukova E. A., Mesheryakova T. V. Philosophical and methodological aspects of bioethical agenda of patient’s autonomy. Tomsk State Pedagogical University Bulletin, 2012, vol. 2 (117), pp. 206–210.
9. Vasyukov V. L. Quantum logic. Moscow, PER SE Publishing, 2005. 192 p. (in Russian).
10. Kripke S. A. Naming and necessity. Oxford, Basil Blackwell Publ., 1980. 172 p.
11. Surovtsev V. A. Necessary a posteriori, counterfactual imaginations and essentialism forms. Tomsk State University Bulletin. Philosophy. Sociology. Political science, 2011, no. 4 (16), pp. 57–63. (in Russian).
12. Dishkant H. An Extension of the Aukasiewicz Logic to the Modal Logic of Quantum Mechanics. Studia Logica, 1978, vol. 37, no. 2, pp. 149–155.
13. Fraassen van В. Semantic Analysis of Quantum Logic. Contemporary Research in the Foundations and Philosophy of Quantum Mechanics. Dordrecht, 1973, pp. 80–113.
14. Stepanov A. A. Magic and concepts of scientifi c-technical creativity. Tomsk State Pedagogical University Bulletin, 2012, vol. 5 (120), pp. 217–220. (in Russian).
15. Melik-Gaykazyan I. V., Elentukh I. P. Criterion for effectiveness of philosophical decisions of scientifi c and technical problems. Tomsk State Pedagogical University Bulletin, 2012, vol. 2 (117), pp. 222–226. (in Russian).
16. Mackey J. Lectures on mathematical bases of quantum mechanics. Moscow, Mir Publ., 1965. 222 p. (in Russian).
17. Goldblatt R. I. Semantic analysis of orthologic. Journal of Philosophical Logic, 1974, vol. 3, no. 1–2, pp. 19–35.
18. Ronde de C. For and against metaphysics in the modal interpretation of quantum mechanics. Philosophica, 2008, vol. 83, pp. 85–117.
( 402.52 kB ) 
( 397.08 kB )
Issue: 9, 2013
Series of issue: Issue 9
Rubric: INTERDISCIPLINARY MESSAGES
Pages: 211 — 214
Downloads: 762