THE APOPHATIC METHOD OF PERSONALITY EXPLICATION
In this work we have done the analysis of the concept of personality, which was formed in the Christian intellectual tradition, based on the substantial ontology and the apophatic method. In the research personality is presented as a transcendental condition of existence of the anthropological reality, which can not be immediately objectified. This makes it possible to talk about the mystery of personality in the context of general cognitive process and governs the apophatic method. Essential difference between the Eastern and Western apophatic traditions is presented.
Keywords: personality, apophaticism, mistery, substance, anthropology
References:
1. Losev A. F. History of ancient aesthetics. The results of the millennial development. In 2 vol. Moscow, Iskusstvo Publ., 1994. Vol. 1. 604 p. (in Russian).
2. Mun’e E. Personalizm. French Philosophy and Aesthetics of the Twentieth Century. Moscow, Gumanitarnaya literatura Publ., 1995. 216 p. (in Russian).
3. Avanesov S. S. Problem and mystery. Tomsk State University Bulletin. Philosophy. Sociology. Political science, 2010., no. 2 (10), pp. 7–11. (in Russian).
4. Horuzhy S. S. Man: being, in three ways disconnecting himself. Chelovek.RU. Humanitarian Almanac. Novosibirsk, NGUEY Publ., 2006, no. 2, pp. 31–56. (in Russian).
5. Borisov V.N. On the category of ousia in Aristotle’s philosophy. URL: http://fi losof.historic.ru/books/item/f00/s00/z0000199 (accessed 02/02/2011) (in Russian)
6. Gutner G. G. Christian understanding of the person and the modern philosophy of mind. Personality in Church and Society: Materials of the International Scientifi c and theological Conference. Moscow, Svyato-Filaretovskaya moskovskaya vysshaya pravoslavno-khristianskaya shkola, 2003. pp. 152–164. (in Russian).
7. Paskal B. Thoughts. Small works. Letters. Moscow, AST Publ., 2003. 536 p. (in Russian).
8. Williams R. Theology of personality: an analysis of Christos Yannaras’s thought. Collegiality. The Collection of Selected Articles from the Magazine of the Commonwealth SOBORNOST. Moscow, Bibleysko-Bogoslovsky Institut sv. apostola Andreya Publ., 1998. Рр. 170–188 (in Russian).
9. Vindel’band B. History of ancient philosophy. Kiev, Tandem Publ., 1995. 358 p. (in Russian).
10. Aristotle Metaphysics. Translations. Comments. Interpretation. Сomp. and the preparation of the text, S. I. Efremova. St. Petersburg, Aleteya, 2002. 823 p. (in Russian).
11. Lossky V. N. Bogovidenie. Moscow, AST Publ., 2003. 759 p. (in Russian).
12. Yannaras H. Selected works: Personality and Eros. Moscow, Ros. Polit. Entsiklopedia (ROSSPEN) Publ., 2005. 480 p. (in Russian).
13. Volkova L. D. Karavaeva E. V. Hesychasm as part of Russian orthodox culture. Tomsk State Pedagogical University Bulletin, 2013, no. 5, pp. 21–28 (in Russian).
14. Sazonova N. I. Structuralism and hermeneutics in the analysis of the sacred text: to the problem. Tomsk State Pedagogical University Bulletin, 2011, no. 11, pp. 199–202 (in Russian).
15. Melik-Gaykazyan I. V. Measurement of a Dream to Lewis Caroll’s rule. Tomsk State Pedagogical University Bulletin, 2011, no. 10, pp. 202–208 (in Russian).
16. Avanesov S. S., Speshilov E. I. Anthropology of the Play. Tomsk State Pedagogical University Bulletin, 2012, no. 4, pp. 209–214 (in Russian).
( 420.75 kB ) 
( 414.83 kB )
Issue: 9, 2013
Series of issue: Issue 9
Rubric: INTERDISCIPLINARY MESSAGES
Pages: 236 — 240
Downloads: 716