WORKING OUT ASSESMENT SYSTEM OF THE DEVELOPMENT LEVEL FOR THE SKILLS TO OPERATE WITH SPATIAL OBJECTS
The paper deals with the rationale for the relevance of measuring the level of development of the ability to manipulate spatial objects by the students when studying geometric and graphic disciplines. It describes the path from the author’s final psychological test adapted to the test in three versions for use in research.
Keywords: spatial thinking, discipline, geometric and graphic cycle, test, reliability test, the validity of the test
References:
1. Anisimova G. A., Pokrovskaya M. V. Geometric and graphic education – the fi rst stage of training of new generation technical and engineering employees. Science and education: electronic scientifi c and technical publication, 2012. URL: http://technomag.edu.ru/doc/288667.html (accessed 18 August 2012) (in Russian).
2. Matveyeva M. V. Bases of forming of students’ graphical culture in engineering education. Tomsk State Pedagogical University Bulletin, 2011, no. 2 (104), pp. 83–86 (in Russian).
3. Nemov R. S. Psychology. General bases of psychology. Vol. 1, issue 4. Moscow, Vlados Publ., 2003, pp. 83–86 (in Russian).
4. Serebryakov V. Universal IQ tests. Mocow, EKSMO-Press Publ., 2001. 128 p. (in Russian).
5. Andryushina T. V., Bolbat O. B. Development of spatial thinking in students of technical institutions in studying of engineering graphics. Novosibirsk, SGUPS Publ., 2004. 115 p. (in Russian).
6. Botvinnikov A. D. Ways of improvement of methods of teaching drafting. Moscow, Prosveshchenie Publ., 1983. 128 p. (in Russian).
7. Zinchenko V. P., Morgunov Ye. B. Developing person. Russian psychology essays. Moscow, Trivola Publ., 1994. 304 p. (in Russian).
8. Lomov B. F. Questions of general, pedagogical and engineering psychology. Moscow, 1991. 296 p. (in Russian).
9. Yakimanskaya I. S. Personally oriented education in modern school. Moscow, Sentiabr’ Publ., 1996. 96 p. (in Russian).
10. Yakimanskaya I. S. The bases of personally oriented education. Moscow, Binom. Laboratory of knowledge Publ., 2011. 224 p. (in Russian).
11. Buravlyov A. I., Pereverzev V. Yu. The choice of optimal length of the pedagogical test and evaluation of it’s results’ reliability. 2001. URL: http://www.e-joe.ru/sod/99/2_99/st160.html (accessed 10 June 2013) (in Russian).
12. Mayorov A. N. Tests of school achievements: designing, realization, application. St. Petersburg, Education and culture Publ., 1997. 304 p. (in Russian).
13. Balykhina T. M. Dictionary of testology terms and concepts. Moscow, MGUP Publ., 2000. 86 p. (in Russian).
14. Andrich D., Sheridan B., Lyne A., Luo G. RUMM: A windows-based item analysis program employing Rasch unidimensional measurement models (Perth: Murdoch University). 2000. URL: http://www.rummlab.com/ (data obrashcheniya 10.06.2013).
15. Maslak A. A. Measuring of latent variable in socio-ecological systems. Slaviansk-na-kubani, SGPI Publ., 2006. 333 p. (in Russian).
16. Kim V. S. Testing of educational achievements. Ussuriysk, USPI, 2007. 214 p. (in Russian).
17. Klayn P. Test development reference guide. Kiyev, PAN ltd. Publ., 1994. 288 p. (in Russian).
( 971.03 kB ) 
( 881.91 kB )
Issue: 9, 2013
Series of issue: Issue 9
Rubric: HIGHER VOCATIONAL EDUCATION IN RUSSIA AND ABROAD
Pages: 61 — 65
Downloads: 708