Tomsk State Pedagogical University Bulletin
RU EN






Today: 24.09.2023
Home Issues 2009 Year Issue №3 THE VISUAL ILLUSION OF BISECTION BY PERSONS OF DIFFERENT SEX, AGE AND VISUAL-MANUAL ASYMMETRY
  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Bulletin Archive
    • 2023 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
    • 2022 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 2021 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 2020 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 2019 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
    • 2018 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
    • 2017 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2016 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2015 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2014 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2013 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
      • Issue №13
    • 2012 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
      • Issue №13
    • 2011 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
      • Issue №13
    • 2010 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2009 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2008 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
    • 2007 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
    • 2006 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2005 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
    • 2004 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
    • 2003 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
    • 2002 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
    • 2001 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
    • 2000 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
    • 1999 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
    • 1998 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 1997 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
  • Rating
  • Search
  • News
  • Editorial Board
  • Information for Authors
  • Review Procedure
  • Information for Readers
  • Editor’s Publisher Ethics
  • Contacts
  • Manuscript submission
  • Received articles
  • Accepted articles
  • Subscribe
  • Service Entrance
vestnik.tspu.edu.ru
praxema.tspu.edu.ru
ling.tspu.edu.ru
npo.tspu.edu.ru
edujournal.tspu.edu.ru

TSPU Bulletin is a peer-reviewed open-access scientific journal.

E-LIBRARY (РИНЦ)
Ulrich's Periodicals Directory
Google Scholar
European reference index for the humanities and the social sciences (erih plus)
DOAJ (Directory of Open Access Journals)
Search by Author
- Not selected -
  • - Not selected -
Яндекс.Метрика

THE VISUAL ILLUSION OF BISECTION BY PERSONS OF DIFFERENT SEX, AGE AND VISUAL-MANUAL ASYMMETRY

Dubrovina Renata Khamitovna, Medvedev Leonid Nesterovich

Information About Author:

The adult were more exact in perception of the vertical-horizontal illusion than children aged 7-13 and adult men were more exact than adult women. Visual-manual hemispheric asymmetry had weak influence on the magnitude of distortion of children. At this time it had strong influence on the magnitude of distortion of adults. The adults right-handed or right leading eye demonstrated lower magnitude of distortion than the left-handers and left leading eye.

Keywords: vertical-horizontal visual illusion, sex, age, hemispheric asymmetries

References:

1. Medvedev, L.N. Influence of age on display of optical Poggendorff illusion / L.N. Medvedev, I.I. Shoshina // Sensory systems. – 2004. – V. 18. –№ 4. – P. 325-329.

2. Medvedev, L.N. The quantitative estimation of influence of sex and hemispheric asymmetries on distortion of visual perception of Poggendorff figure in updating Jastrow / L.N. Medvedev, I.I. Shoshina // Human physiology. – 2004. – V. 30. – № 5. – P. 5-11.

3. Shoshina, I.I. Age features of influence of sex and visual asymmetry on perception of Poggendorff figure / L.N. Medvedev, I.I. Shoshina // Sensory systems. – 2005. – V. 19. – № 1. – P. 37-43.

4. Artamonov, I. D. Illusions of vision / I. D. Artamonov – М.: Nauka, 1969. – 221 p.

5. Vildavsky V.Yu. Experimental research of manual asymmetry of children and teen-agers / V.Yu. Vildavsky, M.G. Knyazeva // New researches on age physiology. – 1987. – № 2. – P. 12-17.

6. Bragina, N.N. The functional asymmetrys of the person. / N.N. Bragina, T.A. Dobrokhotova. M.: Medicine, 1981. – 288 p.

7. Brosvic, G.M. The horizontal-vertical illusion and knowledge of results / G.M. Brosvic, B.D.Cohen // Perceptual and motor skills. – 1988. – V. 67. – № 2. – Р. 463-467.

8. Rozhkova, G.I. The geometrical visual illusions and mechanisms of perception constancy of size at children. / G.I. Rozhkova. V.S. Tokareva et al. // Sensory systems. – 2005. – V. 19. – № 1. – P. 26-36.

9. Declerck, C. Sex differences in susceptibility to the Poggendorf illusion / C. Declerck, B.De Brabander. // Perceptual and motor skills. – 2002. – V. 94. – № 1. – Р. 3-8.

10. Clayson, D.E. Reaction time, bilateral differences and the Poggendorf and Ponzo illusions / D.E. Clayson // Perceptual and motor skills. – 1978. – V. 47. – № 3. – Р. 871-875.

11. Rothwell, B. Visual field differences in the magnitude of the Oppel-Kundt illusion vary with processing time / B. Rothwell, E. Zaidell // Percept. Psychophys. – 1990. – V. 47. – Р. 180-188.

12. Grabowska, A.The effect of unilateral brain lesions on perception of visual illusions / A. Grabowska, O. Szymanska, at all. // Behav. Brain Res. – 1992. – V. 47. – № 2. – Р. 191-197.

13. Lundy, R.M. Hypnotic age-regressoin and magnitude of Ponzo and Poggendorf illusion / R.M. Lundy, Y.W. Leibowitz // Science. – 1968. –V. 159. – P. 1375-1376.

14. Bondarko, V. M. Estimation of the size Ebbingghaus illusion at adults and children of various age / V.M. Bondarko, L.A. Semenov // Human physiology. – 2004. – V. 30. – №1. – P. 31-37.

Dubrovina_R._H.,_Medvedev_L._N._46_48_3_81_2009.pdf ( 1023.6 kB ) Dubrovina_R._H.,_Medvedev_L._N._46_48_3_81_2009.zip ( 637.09 kB )

Issue: 3, 2009

Rubric: Psychophysiology

Pages: 46 — 48

Downloads: 931

For citation:


© 2023 Tomsk State Pedagogical University Bulletin

Development and support: Network Project Laboratory TSPU