Tomsk State Pedagogical University Bulletin
  • RU
  • EN
Today: 13.08.2022
Home Issues 2009 Year Issue №3 FEATURES OF DISTRIBUTION OF MAGNITUDE OF VISUALLY-SPATIAL INTELECT AND ITS INFLUENCE ON PROPENSITY TO VISUAL ILLUSION
  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Bulletin Archive
    • 2022 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
    • 2021 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 2020 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 2019 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
    • 2018 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
    • 2017 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2016 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2015 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2014 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2013 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
      • Issue №13
    • 2012 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
      • Issue №13
    • 2011 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
      • Issue №13
    • 2010 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2009 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2008 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
    • 2007 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
    • 2006 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2005 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
    • 2004 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
    • 2003 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
    • 2002 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
    • 2001 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
    • 2000 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
    • 1999 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
    • 1998 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 1997 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
  • Rating
  • Search
  • News
  • Editorial Board
  • Information for Authors
  • Review Procedure
  • Information for Readers
  • Editor’s Publisher Ethics
  • Contacts
  • Manuscript submission
  • Received articles
  • Accepted articles
  • Subscribe
  • Service Entrance

Journal TSPU

vestnik.tspu.edu.ru
praxema.tspu.edu.ru
ling.tspu.edu.ru
npo.tspu.edu.ru
edujournal.tspu.edu.ru

TSPU Bulletin is a peer-reviewed open-access scientific journal.

E-LIBRARY (РИНЦ)
Ulrich's Periodicals Directory
Google Scholar
European reference index for the humanities and the social sciences (erih plus)
DOAJ (Directory of Open Access Journals)
Search by Author
- Not selected -
  • - Not selected -
Яндекс.Метрика

FEATURES OF DISTRIBUTION OF MAGNITUDE OF VISUALLY-SPATIAL INTELECT AND ITS INFLUENCE ON PROPENSITY TO VISUAL ILLUSION

Fedorova E. S., Shoshina I. I., Medvedev L. N.

Information About Author:

It is established that propensity to visual distortion of Poggendorff figure decreases with increase of visually-spatial intellect at persons with righthemispheric functional asymmetry.

Keywords: visual illusions, visual-spatial intellect, interhemispheric functional asymmetry

References:

1. Artamonov, I. D. Illusions of vision / I. D. Artamonov – М.: Nauka. – 1969. – 221 p.

2. Medvedev, L.N. The quantitative estimation of influence of sex and hemispheric asymmetries on distortion of visual perception of Poggendorff figure in updating Jastrow / L.N. Medvedev, I.I. Shoshina // Human physiology. – 2004. – V. 30. – №5. – P. 5-11.

3. Ognivov, V. V. Mean value and variability of Muller-Lyer illusion in comparison with regular estimation by sight at children and adults / V. V. Ognivov et al. // Sensory systems. – 2006. – V. 29. – №4. – P. 288-299.

4. Declerk, C. Sex differences in susceptibility to the Poggendorff illusion / C. Declerk, B. De Brabander // Percept. Mot. Skills. – 2002. – V. 94. – №1. – P. 3.

5. Leibowitz, H. W. The magnitude of the Poggendorff illusion as a function of age / H. W. Leibowitz, J. Gwozdecki // Child. Dev. – 1967. – V. 38. – №2. – P. 706.

6. Dakin, S. Weak suppression of visual context in chronic schizophrenia / S. Dakin, P. Carlin, D. Hemsley // Current Biology. – 2005. – V. 15. – № 20. – P. 822-824.

7. Milrud, R. P. Diagnostics of proof and time cognitive difficulties at younger schoolboys. / R. P. Milrud, A. V. Mozheiko // Questions of psychology. – 2001. – №3. – С. 117-121.

8. Bragina, N. N. Functional asymmetries of the person. / N. N. Bragina, T. A. Dobrokhotova. – М.: Medicine, 1981. – 288 p.

9. Eysenck, H. The nature of intelligence – fight for reason /H. Eysenck, L. Kemin – М., EKSMO-press, 2002. – 267 p.

10. Druzhinin, V. N. Structure of psychometric intellect and the forecast of individual achievements // Intellect and creativity: collection of proceedings / RАS. Institute of psychology, – М.: 1999. – P. 5-29.

11. Larionov, A. Is considered IQ. An electronic resource: electronic data http://www.bssl.ru/articles/?id=7, St.-Petersburg, 2005.

12. Zhukov, A. O. The mental frustration arising under conditions of deficiency of iodine: abstract of the dissertation of the doctor of medical sciences / A. O. Zhukov. – М., 2007. – 31 p.

13. Best, C. The boundaries of the cognitive phenotype of autism: social cognition and central coherence in young people with autistic traits and their first degree relatives. – The University of Edinburgh. 2007. – 276 p.

14. Nikolaenko, N. N. The role of the right and left hemispheres of a brain in perception of space. The part II. Perception of depth as interhemispheric phenomenon / N. N. Nikolaenko, A. U. Egorov // Human psychology. – 1998. – V. 25 – № 6. – P. 21–31.

15. Egorov, A. U. Geometrical figure discrimination in visual fields and functional asymmetry of brain / A. U. Egorov // Sensory systems. – 1995. – V. 9. – №1. P. 75-80.

16. Shoshina, I.I. Age features of influence of sex and visual asymmetry on perception of Poggendorff figure / L.N. Medvedev, I.I. Shoshina // Sensory systems. – 2005. – V. 19. – № 1. – P. 37-43.

Fedorova_E._S.,_SHoshina_I._I.,_Medvedev_L._N._42_45_3_81_2009.pdf ( 3.01 MB ) Fedorova_E._S.,_SHoshina_I._I.,_Medvedev_L._N._42_45_3_81_2009.zip ( 2.33 MB )

Issue: 3, 2009

Rubric: Psychophysiology

Pages: 42 — 45

Downloads: 789

For citation:


© 2022 Tomsk State Pedagogical University Bulletin

Development and support: Network Project Laboratory TSPU