Tomsk State Pedagogical University Bulletin
  • RU
  • EN
Today: 17.08.2022
Home Issues 2009 Year Issue №3 NEGATIVE CHRONOTROPIC EFFECT OF CANNABINOIDS IS DEPENDED ON THE ACTIVATION OF CARDIAC CB1 RECEPTORS
  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Bulletin Archive
    • 2022 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
    • 2021 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 2020 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 2019 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
    • 2018 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
    • 2017 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2016 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2015 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2014 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2013 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
      • Issue №13
    • 2012 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
      • Issue №13
    • 2011 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
      • Issue №13
    • 2010 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2009 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2008 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
    • 2007 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
    • 2006 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2005 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
    • 2004 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
    • 2003 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
    • 2002 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
    • 2001 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
    • 2000 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
    • 1999 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
    • 1998 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 1997 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
  • Rating
  • Search
  • News
  • Editorial Board
  • Information for Authors
  • Review Procedure
  • Information for Readers
  • Editor’s Publisher Ethics
  • Contacts
  • Manuscript submission
  • Received articles
  • Accepted articles
  • Subscribe
  • Service Entrance

Journal TSPU

vestnik.tspu.edu.ru
praxema.tspu.edu.ru
ling.tspu.edu.ru
npo.tspu.edu.ru
edujournal.tspu.edu.ru

TSPU Bulletin is a peer-reviewed open-access scientific journal.

E-LIBRARY (РИНЦ)
Ulrich's Periodicals Directory
Google Scholar
European reference index for the humanities and the social sciences (erih plus)
DOAJ (Directory of Open Access Journals)
Search by Author
- Not selected -
  • - Not selected -
Яндекс.Метрика

NEGATIVE CHRONOTROPIC EFFECT OF CANNABINOIDS IS DEPENDED ON THE ACTIVATION OF CARDIAC CB1 RECEPTORS

Maslov L. N., Krylatov A. V., Lasukova O. V., Khaliulin I. G.

Information About Author:

It has been found that intravenous administration of cannabinoids (ACPA, anandamide, methanandamide) solubilized in the mixture (cremophore EL : ethanol : 0,9% NaCl, 1:1:18) and Tocris water soluble emulsion of the same cannabinoids induced a completely identical negative chronotropic effect in chloralose-anesthetized rats. The selective CB1 and CB2 receptor agonist HU-210 (0.1 mg/kg) also induced a negative chronotropic effect in rats. Pretreatment with the CB1 receptor antagonist SR141716A (1 mg/kg) completely abolished this effect of HU-210. The CB2 receptor antagonist SR144528 (1 mg/kg) had no effect on the HU-210-induced bradycardia. Pretreatment with the ganglion blocker hexamethonium (10 mg/kg) also did not eliminate a negative chronotropic effect of HU-210 and ACPA. A 10-min perfusion of isolated rat heart by Krebs-Heseleit solution containing HU-210 in a final concentration 100 nM/L induced a decrease in the heart rate. It has been concluded that negative chronotropic effect of cannabinoids is mediated via an activation of cardiac CB1 receptors.

Keywords: cannabinoids, heart rhythm

References:

1. Felder C.C., Veluz J.S., Williams H.L., et al. Cannabinoid agonists stimulate both receptor- and non-receptor-mediated signal transduction pathways in cells transfected with and expressing cannabinoid receptor clones // Mol. Pharmacol. 1992; Vol. 42: 838-845.

2. Howlett A.C., Barth F., Bonner T.I. et al. International Union of Pharmacology. XXVII. Classification of cannabinoid receptors // Pharmacol. Rev. 2002; 54, N 2: 161-202.

3. Pertwee R.G. Pharmacology of cannabinoid receptor ligands // Current Med. Chem. 1999; Vol. 6: 635-664.

4. Bonz A., Laser M., Kullmer S. et al. Cannabinoids acting on CB1 receptors decrease contractile performance in human atrial muscle // J. Cardiovasc. Pharmacol. 2003; Vol. 41, N 4: P. 657-664.

5. Vidrio H., Sanchez-Salvatori M.A., Medina M. Cardiovascular effects of (-)-11-OH-D8-tetrahydrocannabinol-dimethylheptyl in rats // J. Cardiovascular. Pharmacol. 1996; Vol. 28: 332-336.

6. Sander G.E., Lowe R.F., Given M.B., Giles T.D. Interactions between circulating peptides and the central nervous system in hemodynamic regulation // Am. J. Cardiol. 1989; Vol. 64: 44C-50C.

7. Krylatov A.V., Bernazkaya N.A., Maslov L.N. et al. Cannabinoid receptor activation increases cardiac resistance against arrhythmogenic influences and decreases infarction size. Russian J. Physiol. 2002; 88(5): 560-567.

8. Maslov L.N., Lasukova O.V., Krylatov A.V., Lishmanov Yu.B., Pertwee R. Alteration of inotropic function of isolated heart and extent of injury of cardiomyocytes after cannabinoid receptor activation during ischemia and reperfusion. Russian J. Physiol. 2003; 89(9): 1108-1116.

9. Cavero I., Solomon T., Buckley J.P., Jandhyla B.S. Studies on the bradycardia induced by (-)-Д9-trans-tetrahydrocannabinol in anesthetized dogs // Eur. J. Pharmacol. 1973; Vol. 22, N 3: P. 263-269.

10. Volmer R.R., Cavero I., Ertel R.J. et al. Role of central autonomic nervous system in the hypotension and bradycardia induced by (-)-Д9-trans-tetrahydrocannabinol // J. Pharm. Pharmac. 1974; Vol. 26, N 3: 186-192.

11. Randall M.D., Harris D., Kendall D.A., Ralevic V. Cardiovascular effects of cannabinoids // Pharmacol. Ther. 2002; Vol. 95, N 2: 191-202.

Maslov_L._N.,_Krilatov_A._V.,_Lasukova_O._V.,_Haliulin_I._G._36_41_3_81_2009.pdf ( 2.88 MB ) Maslov_L._N.,_Krilatov_A._V.,_Lasukova_O._V.,_Haliulin_I._G._36_41_3_81_2009.zip ( 2.33 MB )

Issue: 3, 2009

Rubric: Cardiology and Functional Diagnostics

Pages: 36 — 41

Downloads: 779

For citation:


© 2022 Tomsk State Pedagogical University Bulletin

Development and support: Network Project Laboratory TSPU