Epistolary of V. Mayakovsky as a discursive space of the author’s self-presentation
DOI: 10.23951/1609-624X-2024-6-7-16
Modern cognitive and discursive linguistics are a direction in linguistics that focuses on the study of the mechanisms of linguistic representation of personality. Within the anthropocentric paradigm, linguistic research takes on a new dimension, focusing on the study of various aspects of human activity and perception of the world through a linguistic prism, as well as the ways an individual interacts with the sociocultural environment through language. The main subject of analysis within this topic is the study of how individual personality traits are manifested in language and how language influences the formation and expression of these characteristics. Discourse, in turn, is a specific linguistic work (text), in which various linguistic means are implemented and interact, thereby reflecting the identity of the author and his relationship with the social environment. Discourse analysis allows us to identify exactly how linguistic personality is manifested in various types of texts, be it public speech, literary work, scientific text or letters. The epistolary of Vladimir Mayakovsky is one of the most significant sources for studying not only the literary heritage of the author, but also the mechanisms of his self-presentation in the context of cultural life of the early 20th century. Writing as a genre, traditionally recognized as secondary in relation to the main literary works, in the context of Mayakovsky’s work acts as a fruitful discursive space where both intellectual and emotional aspects of his creative personality are revealed through the author’s self-presentation. In the course of analyzing the multidimensional factors of V. V. Mayakovsky’s self-presentation, a set of tools used by the author to structure interaction with the recipients of his texts and to present his identity within the framework of epistolary discourse is determined. Attention is focused on the study of techniques for representing personality in a certain discourse. A discursive analysis of the epistolary heritage of V. V. Mayakovsky allows us to identify the specifics of the author’s self-presentation, which was determined not only by the personal ambitions and life experience of the poet, but also by the broad context of the sociocultural changes of the era.
Keywords: epistolary discourse, epistolary genre, private correspondence, communicative strategy, self-presentation, Vladimir Vladimirovich Mayakovsky
References:
1. Arutyunova N. D. Predlozheniye i ego smysl. Logiko-semanticheskiye problemy [The sentence and its meaning. Logical-semantic problems]. Moscow, Nauka Publ., 1976. 382 p. (in Russian).
2. Kubryakova E. S. O ponyatii diskursa i diskursivnogo analiza v sovremennoy lingvistike [On the concept of discourse and discourse analysis in modern linguistics]. Diskurs, rech, rechevaya deyatel’nost’: funktsional’nye i strukturnye aspekty: sbornik obzorov [Discourse, speech, speech activity: functional and structural aspects: collection of reviews]. Moscow, Institute of Scientific Information for Social Sciences (RAN) Publ., 2000. Рр. 7‒21 (in Russian).
3. Popov A. Yu. Osnovnye otlichiya teksta ot diskursa [The main differences between text and discourse]. Tekst i diskurs. Problemy ekonomicheskogo diskursa: sbornik nauchnykh statey [Text and discourse. Problems of economic discourse: collection of scientific articles]. Saint Petersburg, St. Petersburg State University of Economics and Finance Publ., 2001. Рр. 38‒46 (in Russian).
4. Sternin I. A. Metodika issledovaniya struktury kontsepta [Methodology for studying the structure of a concept]. Metodologicheskiye problemy kognitivnoy lingvistiki: sbornik statey [Methodological problems of cognitive linguistics: Digest of articles]. Voronezh, Voronezh State University Publ., 2001. Рр. 58–65 (in Russian).
5. Stepanov Yu. S. Al’ternativnyy mir. Diskurs, Fakt i printsip Prichinnosti [Alternative world. Discourse, Fact and Principle, Causality]. Yazyk i nauka kontsa XX v.: sbornik statey [Language and science of the late 20th century: Digest of articles]. Moscow, Russian State University for the Humanities Publ., 1995. Рр. 38–39 (in Russian). – 14 – Халатян А. А., Курьянович А. В. Эпистолярий В. Маяковского как дискурсивное пространство…
6. Issers O. S. Kommunikativnye strategii i taktiki russkoy rechi [Communicative strategies and tactics of Russian speech]. Moscow, KomKniga Publ., 2006. 288 p. (in Russian).
7. Kovrigina E. A. Kommunikativnaya strategiya samoprezentatsii v diskurse internet-interv’yu. Avtoref. dis. kand. filol. nauk [Communicative strategy of self-presentation in online interview discourse. Abstract of thesis cand. philol. sci.]. Kemerovo, 2010. 24 p. (in Russian).
8. Pushkin A. A. Sposob organizatsii diskursa i tipologiya yazykovykh lichnostey [Method of organizing discourse and typology of linguistic personalities]. Yazyk, diskurs i lichnost’: mezhvuzovskiy sbornik nauchnykh trudov [Language, discourse and personality: interuniversity collection of scientific articles]. Tver, Tver State University Publ., 1990. Рр. 50‒60 (in Russian).
9. Kulinich E. V. Spetsifika samoprezentatsii kak kommunikativnogo yavleniya [Specifics of self-presentation as a communicative phenomenon]. Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta ‒ Tomsk State University Journal, 2007, no. 299, pр. 7‒10 (in Russian).
10. Solov’eva N. V. Strategii prezentatsii kommunikantov v tekstakh nauchnykh diskussiy [Strategies for presenting communicants in scientific discussion texts]. Rossiyskaya i zarubezhnaya filologiya ‒ Russian and foreign philology, 2009, no. 1, pр. 29‒37 (in Russian).
11. El’kina O. M. Samoprezentatsiya avtora teksta v komp’yuterno-oposredovannoy kommunikatsii [Self-presentation of the author of the text in computer-mediated communication]. Vestnik Maykopskogo gosudarstvennogo tekhnologicheskogo universiteta ‒ Bulletin of Maykop State Technological University, 2011, no. 2, pр. 88‒93 (in Russian).
12. Gerasimenko I. A. Kognitivnyy kontekst epistolyarnogo diskursa A. Chekhova [Cognitive context of A. Chekhov’s epistolary discourse]. Uchenyye zapiski Krymskogo federal’nogo universiteta imeni V. I. Vernadskogo. Filologicheskiye nauki ‒ Scientific notes of the Crimean Federal University named after V. I. Vernadsky. Philological sciences, 2016, vol. 2 (68), no. 4, Рр. 104–108 (in Russian).
13. Kuryanovich A. V. Kognitivnaya sushchnost’ rechevogo zhanra samoprezentatsiya v epistolyarnom diskurse M. I. Tsvetaevoy [The cognitive essence of the speech genre of self-presentation in the epistolary discourse of M. I. Tsvetaeva]. Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo pedagogicheskogo universiteta ‒ Tomsk State Pedagogical University Bulletin, 2006, no. 5, pр. 144‒150 (in Russian).
14. Kairova T. S. Osobennosti kommunikativnoy napravlennosti epistolyarnogo teksta [Features of the communicative orientation of an epistolary text]. Uchenyye zapiski Moskovskogo pedagogicheskogo instituta inostrannykh yazykov ‒ Scientific notes Moscow. ped. institute of foreign language, 1986, vol. 269, pр. 87–103 (in Russian).
15. Sedova O. N. Epistolyarnyy stil’ v sisteme funktsional’nykh stiley russkogo yazyka: nauchnye doklady vysshey shkoly [Epistolary style in the system of functional styles of the Russian language: scientific reports of higher education]. Filologicheskiye nauki ‒ Philological sciences, 1985, no. 6. Рр. 57–62 (in Russian).
16. Stepanov N. L. Druzheskoye pis’mo nachala XIX veka [Friendly letter of the early 19th century]. In: Eikhenbaum B. N., Tynyanov Yu. N. (eds.) Russkaya proza: sbornik [Russian prose: collection]. Leningrad, Academia Publ., 1926. Рр. 74–101 (in Russian).
17. Protopopova O. V. Epistolyarnyy zhanr [Epistolary genre]. In: Kozhina M. N. (ed.) Stilisticheskiy entsiklopedicheskiy slovar’ russkogo yazyka [Stylistic encyclopedic dictionary of the Russian language]. Moscow, Flinta: Nauka Publ., 2003. 156 p. (in Russian).
18. Grigor’eva A. S. Statichnaya struktura russkogo epistolyarnogo teksta (Leksika chastnyh pisem). Avtoref. dis. kand. filol. nauk [Static structure of Russian epistolary text. (Vocabulary of private letters). Abstract of thesis cand. philol. sci.]. Leningrad, 1981. 230 p. (in Russian).
19. Nizhnikova N. V. Pis’mo kak tip teksta. Avtoref. dis. kand. filol. nauk [Letter as a type of text. Abstract of thesis cand. philol. sci.]. Odessa, 1991. 85 p. (in Russian).
20. Kuryanovich A. V. Teoreticheskiye voprosy izucheniya epistolyariya v sovremennoy lingvistike [Theoretical issues in the study of epistolary in modern linguistics]. Tomsk, Izd-vo Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo pedagogcicheskogo universiteta Publ., 2013. 220 р. (in Russian).
21. Mayakovsky V. V. Polnoye sobraniye sochineniy: v 13 tomakh [Complete works: in 13 volumes]. Moscow, Khudozhestvennaya literatura Publ., 1961. Vol. 13. 658 p. (in Russian).
( 496.22 kB ) 
( 491.61 kB )
Issue: 6, 2024
Series of issue: Issue 6
Rubric: THEORETICAL AND APPLIED LINGUISTICS
Pages: 7 — 16
Downloads: 1