Technology of flowed learning: advantages, disadvantages and creating ideal conditions for introduction in the educational process
DOI: 10.23951/1609-624X-2024-5-90-98
Questions regarding the integration of “flipped learning” technology in the academic process, which allow students to acquire and understand new material outside of the classroom and apply it in academic discussions, debates, and projects, draw particular attention from researchers and staff in educational facilities. The application of this technique invokes the student’s creative potential and capability, leading to improved learning outcomes and student activity, however its successful application requires certain approaches and resources. The purpose of the study is to determine the essence of “flipped learning”; to study its existing advantages and disadvantages; to evaluate the effectiveness of the assimilation process of the studied material by students as a result of the introduction of this technology. The resources for this study were the theoretical methods of comparative analysis and general content of scientific and pedagogical literature by domestic and foreign scientists working in similar research areas. The verification of the accuracy and validity of the constructed model, which indicated the effectiveness of the technology used, was carried out by the methods of observation, pedagogical experiment, modeling, regression and correlation analyses. The main characteristics of learning are described: the individualization of the educational process, the rational distribution of free time with productive independent work at one’s own pace, and the unlimited use of electronic educational resources. Despite the identified imperfections and certain potential problems for teachers and students, the technology has many advantages, and discussions by authors of the scientific and pedagogical literature on the topic of study made it possible to carry out our own research to identify the advantages and disadvantages when introduced into the educational process. The effectiveness of the degree of material assimilation when using this technology was tested by us at the Institute of Mathematics and Computer Science of Buryat State University and at the Ulan-Bator branch of the Plekhanov Russian University of Economics. In the course of the study, tests trials were carried out to measure residual knowledge and students were surveyed to assess the quality of the proposed technology. As an experiment to determine the effectiveness of the methodology, the authors prepared and posted presentations on one of the basic topics of mathematical analysis in the digital educational sphere of universities. To achieve maximum efficiency in the use of this method, it is necessary to take into account the individual needs and abilities of each student and to create a suitable environment for independent work, providing necessary technical support. The results of the study demonstrated that ad the results of the application of “flipped learning”, students were motivated to improve the quality of gained knowledge, and were incentivized to learn on their own, and the level of their self-organization increased as well.
Keywords: flipped classroom, teaching methodology, blended learning, interactive learning, educational process, informational educational environment of the university
References:
1. Mazur E. Peer Instruction: A User’s Manual. Prentice Hall. 1997. 194 р.
2. Bergmann J., Sams A. Flip Your Classroom: Reach Every Student in Every Class Every Day. International Society for Technology in Education. 2012. 124 р.
3. Bergmann J., Sams A. Flipped Learning: Gateway to Student Engagement. Moorabbin, Victoria: Hawker Brownlow, 2015. 169 p. URL: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/320729266.pdf (accessed 26 March 2023).
4. Vavichkina T. A. Opyt primeneniya pedagogicheskoy tekhnologii “perevyornutoye obucheniye” pri distantsionnom obuchenii arabskomu yazyku studentov neyazykovogo vuza [The experience of using the pedagogical technology “flipped learning” in the distance learning of the Arabic language for students of a non-linguistic university]. Pedagogika. Voprosy teorii i praktiki – Pedagogy. Theory and Practice, 2020, no. 5 (6), pp. 746750 (in Russian).
5. Vulfovich E. V. Organizatsiya samostoyatel’noy raboty po inostrannomu yazyku na osnove modeli “Perevyornutyy klass” [Organization of independent work in a foreign language based on the “Flipped class” model]. Vyssheye obrazovaniye v Rossii – Higher Education in Russia, 2017, no. 4, pp. 8895 (in Russian).
6. Dumina E. V. Obrazovatel’nyy potentsial pedagogicheskoy modeli “Perevyornutoye obucheniye” v usloviyakh inoyazychnoy podgotovki studentov neyazykovogo vuza [Educational potential of the pedagogical model “Flipped learning” in the conditions of foreign language training of students of a non-linguistic university]. Vestnik Moskovskogo gosudarstvennogo lingvisticheskogo universiteta. Gumanitarnyye nauki – Vestnik of Moscow State Linguistic University. Humanities, 2018, no. 17 (815), pp. 2635 (in Russian).
7. Bishop J. L., Verleger M. A. The Flipped Classroom: A Survey of the Research. 120th American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference and Exposition, 2013, vol. 30, pp. 118.
8. Brame C. Flipping the Classroom. URL: http://cft.vanderbilt.edu/guides-sub-pages/flipping-the-classroom/ (accessed 25 March 2023).
9. Brunsell E. Flipping Your Classroom. The Science Teacher, 2013, vol. 80 (2), pp. 1016.
10. Evans C. Making Sense of the Flipped Classroom: A Review of the Literature. Nurse Education Today, 2013, vol. 34 (10), pp. 12541257.
11. Galakyani A. P. Visual, Auditory, Kinaesthetic Learning Styles and Their Impacts on English Language Teaching. Journal of Studies in Education, 2012, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 104113.
12. Lage M. J., Platt G. J., Treglia M. Inverting the Classroom: A Gateway to Creating an Inclusive Learning Environment. The Journal of Economic Education, 2000, vol. 31 (1), pp. 3043.
13. Tsepov A. L. “Perevyornutyy klass” [“Inverted class”]. Smolenskiy meditsinskiy al’manakh, 2019, no. 3, pp. 175-184 (in Russian).
14. Musiychuk M. V., Karmanova E. V., Stashuk P. V. Ob opyte primeneniya tekhnologii “Flipped Classroom” v vuze v protsesse izucheniya kursa “Upravleniye IT-proyektami” [About the experience of using the technology “flipped classroom” in the course of studying the course “IT-project Management” at the University]. Mir nauki. Pedagogika i psikhologiya – World of Science. Pedagogy and psychology, 2018, no. 6 (6) (in Russian). URL: https://mir-nauki.com/PDF/151PDMN618.pdf
15. Vorob’yov A. E., Murzaeva A. K. Analiz osobennostey primeneniya tekhnologii “Perevyornutogo obucheniya” v ekonomicheskikh vuzakh [Analysis of the features of the application of the “Flipped Learning” technology in economic universities]. Otkrytoye obrazovaniye – Open Education, 2018, vol. 22, no. 2, pp. 413 (in Russian).
16. Yurina M. V., Lopukhova Yu. V. Primeneniye innovatsionnoy tekhnologii “Perevyornutoye obucheniye” pri obuchenii inostrannomu yazyku v tekhnicheskom vuze [Application of the innovative technology “Flipped Learning” in teaching a foreign language in a technical university]. Samarskiy nauchnyy vestnik – Samara Journal of Science, 2017, vol. 6, no. 4 (21), pp. 262266 (in Russian).
17. Remizova E. G. Realizatsiya metodiki smeshannogo obucheniya po modeli “perevyornutyy klass” na urokakh informatiki [Implementation of the method of blended learning according to the “flipped class” model in informatics lessons]. In: Sbornik trudov III Mezhdunarodnoy nauchno-prakticheskoy konferentsii ITO-Moscow [Collection of works of the III International scientific and practical conference ITO-Moscow]. 2014. Pp. 83–88 (in Russian).
18. Sorokova M. G. Elektronnyy kurs kak tsifrovoy obrazovatel’nyy resurs smeshannogo obucheniya v usloviyakh vysshego obrazovaniya [E-course as a digital educational resource of blended learning in higher education]. Psikhologicheskaya nauka i obrazovaniye, 2020, vol. 25, no. 1, pp. 36–50 (in Russian). doi: 10.17759/pse.2020250104
19. Talbert R. Flipped Learning: A Guide for Higher Education Faculty. Stylus, 2017. 264 р.
20. King A. A case study of the flipped classroom and its effectiveness in a middle school mathematics classroom. Journal of educational technology development and exchange, 2015, vol. 8 (1), pp. 114.
21. Tsyrenova V. B., Lumbunova N. B. Pedagogicheskaya fasilitatsiya razvitiya tvorcheskikh sposobnostey pri obuchenii matematike [Pedagogical facilitation of the development of creative abilities in teaching mathematics]. Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo pedagogicheskogo universiteta – Tomsk State Pedagogical University Bulletin, 2021, no. 2, pp. 119125 (in Russian). DOI: 10.23951/1609-624X-2021-2-119-125
22. Yumova Ts. Zh., Yumov I. B. Puti formirovaniya i povysheniya uchebnoy motivatsii [Ways of formation and improvement of educational motivation]. Pedagogicheskiye tekhnologii dlya realizatsii sovremennykh obrazovatel’nykh standartov: sbornik statey mezhdunarodnoy nauchno-metodicheskoy konferentsii [Pedagogical technologies for the implementation of modern educational standards: a collection of articles from the international scientific and methodological conference]. Ulan-Ude, 2021. Pp. 100103 (in Russian).
23. Dyakonov V. P. Maple 10/11/12/13/14 v matematicheskikh raschyotakh [Maple 10/11/12/13/14 in mathematical calculations] DMK-Press, 2018. 800 p. (in Russian).
( 414.89 kB ) 
( 410.9 kB )
Issue: 5, 2024
Series of issue: Issue 5
Rubric: METHODOLOGY AND TECHNOLOGY OF PROFESSIONAL EDUCATION
Pages: 90 — 98
Downloads: 124