The current state of the quality of practical training of future teachers and the prospects for its improvement
DOI: 10.23951/1609-624X-2023-2-77-85
Based on the study of the future teachers’ practical training quality, the article analyzes difficulties faced by young teachers at the beginning of their pedagogical career. The author examines the level of the teachers’ satisfaction with their pedagogical skills, their employers’ opinion on the improvement of pedagogical education. The goal of the research is to study teachers’ practical training quality and prospects of its improvement. A set of scientific research methods was used, presented by a theoretical analysis of psychological and pedagogical literature; questioning of practitioners of educational organizations, graduate students of pedagogical education and young teachers; the method of expert assessments used in discussions of the problems of the quality of practical training and prospects for its improvement; analysis of primary statistics. Results of the experiment research have confirmed the hypothesis about the difference between the levels of satisfaction with the practical training quality in each category of respondents. Opinions of employers, young teachers, and students have some common points. For example, all of them have noticed deficiency of skills tied to preparation of the school documents, use of knowledge of educational legal acts in the professional activity. Different ideas of students and young teachers about the professional activity are the reason for the difference. The article represents the main directions of improvement of the practical training quality: priority of the teaching practice as a form of practical training; involvement of practitioners (representatives of employers) in the creation and implementation of basic professional educational programs; the inclusion of practice-oriented technologies in the process of training a future teacher; individualization of the educational trajectory. Results of the research represented in the article may be used in the main professional education programs, additional education programs aimed at getting teaching skills. Changes to the basic educational programs were made at the stage of their updating and affected the following aspects: an extensive list of practice-oriented disciplines was included in the curricula; the content of disciplines and the logic of building educational and industrial practices aimed at practical training have been changed; the formation of digital competencies of future teachers is carried out when mastering the content of several elective disciplines. The allocation of the so-called “Core of Pedagogical Education” in the basic professional educational programs made it possible to to implement the principle of unity of subject, methodological and psychological-pedagogical training in the field of education, as well as to ensure uniform requirements for the content of educational programs of various directions, to the results and conditions of the implementation of pedagogical education programs.
Keywords: pedagogical education, practical training, satisfaction with the training quality
References:
1. Gutnik I. Yu. Pedagogicheskaya diagnostika professional’nykh defitsitov uchitelya v usloviyakh transformatsii sovremennogo obrazovaniya [Pedagogical diagnostics of professional teacher defitsits in the conditions of transformation of modern education]. Science for Education Today, 2021, no. 11 (4), pp. 33–45 (in Russian).
2. Dudina O. P. Monitoring professional’nykh defitsitov pedagogicheskikh rabotnikov sistemy dopolnitel’nogo professional’nogo obrazovaniya kak instrument povysheniya kachestva realizatsii program [Monitoring of professional defitsits of teachers of the system of additional vocational education as a tool to improve the quality of program implementation]. Nauchno-metodicheskoye obespecheniye otsenki kachestva obrazovaniya – Scientific and methodical provision to assessment the education quality, 2020, no. 1, pp. 113–118 (in Russian).]
3. Mamalova Kh. E., Akhmadova Z. M. Organizatsiya neprery’vnoy pedagogicheskoy praktiki v usloviyakh vuza [Organization of continuous pedagogical practice in the conditions of the university]. Mir nauki, kul’tury’, obrazovaniya – The world of science, culture, education, 2018, no. 6 (73), pp. 167–168 (in Russian).
4. Bayborodova L. V. Praktiko-oriyentirovannyy podkhod k podgotovke budushchikh pedagogov [A practice-oriented approach to the training of future teachers]. Yaroslavskiy pedagogicheskiy vestnik – Yaroslavl Pedagogical Bulletin, 2015, no. 2 (1), pp. 47–52 (in Russian).
5. Lazarev M. A., Stukalova O. V., Temirov T. V. Professional’naya ustoychivost’ budushchikh pedagogov: potentsial v protsesse podgotovki i kriterii otsenki [Professional stability of future teachers: potential in the preparation process and evaluation criteria]. Nauka i shkola – Science and School, 2018, no. 2, pp. 62–68 (in Russian). Doi: 10.24412/Fd9TU4rDsk0
6. Lenskaya E. A. Kachestvo obrazovaniya i kachestvo podgotovki uchitelya [The quality of education and the quality of teacher training]. Voprosy obrazovaniya – Educational Studies, 2008, no. 4, pp. 81–96 (in Russian).
7. Gutnik I. Yu. Obosnovaniye sovremennogo ponimaniya ponyatiya “pe-dagogicheskaya diagnostika” [Substantiation of the modern understanding of the concept of “pedagogical diagnostics”]. Vestnik Orlovskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriya: Novyye gumanitarnyye issledovaniya – Bulletin of Orel State University. Series: New humanitarian research, 2015, no. 5, pp. 116–120 (in Russian).
8. Platonova R. I., Neverkovich S. D., Parfenov I. Ya. Organizatsiya pedagogicheskoy praktiki v vuzakh [Organization of pedagogical practice in universities]. Vestnik Severo-Vostochnogo federal’nogo universiteta im. M. K. Ammosova. Seriya: Pedagogika. Psikhologiya. Filosofiya – Vestnik of North- Eastern Federal University. Pedagogics. Psychology. Philosophy, 2016, no. 2 (02), pp. 23–30 (in Russian).
9. Nikolayeva N. V., Vinokurova E. S. Osobennosti, kontseptual’nyye podkhody i printsipy proyektirovaniya OPOP bakalavriata po pedagogicheskomu napravleniyu podgotovki po FGOS VO 3++ [Features, conceptual approaches and principles of designing a bachelor’s degree in the pedagogical direction of training in the Federal State Educational Standard in 3++]. Obshchestvo: sotsiologiya, psikhologiya, pedagogika – Society: Sociology, Psychology, Pedagogics, 2021, no. 12 (92), pp. 298–306 (in Russian).
10. Smoleusova T. V. Metodicheskaya gotovnost’ uchiteley k vnedreniyu na zanyatiyakh innovatsiy, sootvetstvuyushchikh trebovaniyam FGOS [Methodical readiness of teachers to introduce innovations in the classroom that meet the requirements of the Federal State Educational Standard]. Vestnik Novosibirskogo gosudarstvennogo pedagogicheskogo universiteta – Bulletin of the Novosibirsk State Pedagogical University, 2015, no. 4, pp. 27–36 (in Russian). Doi: 10.15293/2226-3365.1504.03
11. Temnyatkina O. V., Tokmeninova D. V. Sovremennyye podkhody k otsenke effektivnosti raboty uchiteley. Obzor zarubezhnykh publikatsiy [Modern approaches to evaluating the effectiveness of teachers. Review of foreign publications]. Voprosy obrazovaniya – Educational Studies Moscow, 2018, no. 3, pp. 180–195 (in Russian). Doi.org/10.17323/1814-9545-2018-3-180-195
12. Neumoeva-Kolchedantseva E. V. Opyt i perspektivy individualizatsii sovremennogo pedagogicheskogo obrazovaniya v kontekste praktiki [Experience and prospects of individualization of modern pedagogical education in the context of practice] Obrazovatel’nyye tekhnologii – Educational Technologies, 2019, no. 4, pp. 36–48 (in Russian).
13. Kifik N. Yu. Rol’ pedagogicheskoy praktiki v professional’nom stanovlenii budushchikh uchiteley [The role of pedagogical practice in the professional development of future teachers]. Pedagogicheskaya nauka i praktika, 2013, no. 1 (1), pp. 55–60 (in Russian).
14. Pinskaya M., Ponomareva A., Kosaretskiy S. Povysheniye kvalifikatsii i perepodgotovka molodykh uchiteley v Rossii [Professional development and retraining of young teachers in Russia]. Voprosy obrazovaniya – Educational Studies Moscow, 2016, no. 2 (eng), pp. 100–124 (in Russian). Doi: 10.17323/1814-9545-2016-2-100-124
15. Prosekov А. Yu., Morozova I. S., Filatova E. V. A Case Study of Graduate Quality: Subjective Opinions of Participants in the Sphere of Education. European Journal of Contemporary Education, 2020, no. 9 (1), pp. 114–125 (in Russian). Doi: 10.13187/ejced.2020.1.114CrossRef
16. El’kina O. Yu., Lozovan L. Ya. Upravleniye transformatsiyami soderzhaniya i form prakticheskoy podgotovki budushchikh pedagogov [Management of transformations of the content and forms of practical training of future teachers]. Prakticheskaya podgotovka pedagogov: poisk perspektiv: natsional’naya nauchno-prakticheskaya konferentsiya [Practical training of teachers: search for prospects: National scientific and practical conference]. Novokuznetsk, KGPI KemGU Publ., 2022. Pp. 56–61 (in Russian). URL: https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=49231270 (accessed 15 September 2022).
( 418.7 kB ) 
( 411.02 kB )
Issue: 2, 2023
Series of issue: Issue 2
Rubric: PROFESSIONAL TRAINING OF TEACHER
Pages: 77 — 85
Downloads: 480