Pedagogical evaluation or urban resources
DOI: 10.23951/1609-624X-2023-2-33-42
The problem of educators’ evaluation of urban sites in order to select them and include in the educational process in accordance with current pedagogical objectives has become very important. For this purpose, teachers and educational authorities need to make organizational and teaching decisions, depending on the characteristics of urban objects under consideration. The focus of the study is to develop and describe a pedagogical assessment tool to evaluate urban facilities, which will help in making informed decisions. The aim of the study is to develop a convenient tool for educators to assess the urban environment in terms of opportunities and ways of using its various elements in the teaching process. To achieve the goal, it is necessary to identify evaluation criteria, describe them, define indicators for each criterion, and verify whether the proposed tool meets the needs of educators. To conduct the study, the methods of questioning, interviewing, analysis, modeling and verifying results of the study were used. As a result of the analysis of available scales of assessment of the educational environment, questioning and interviewing teachers, and modeling, the authors developed three criteria for pedagogical evaluation of urban facilities. These include safety, accessibility, and educational potential. Each criterion is characterized by several indicators. It is proposed to evaluate physical, psychological and informational safety, organizational, communicative, psychological and pedagogical, normative, physical, temporal, material accessibility, as well as educational value, adequacy of the object to pedagogical goals, uniqueness and effectiveness. The developed assessment tool was tested in the pedagogical community of Moscow in the form of practical works on the assessment of urban facilities and their subsequent discussion. The data was received the practical applicability of the pedagogical assessment tool of urban objects by teachers of primary and secondary schools for the selection of urban environment objects in order to include them in the educational process and to expand the range of urban resources used in the educational process.
Keywords: educational urban studies, city, urban environment, urban educational resources, pedagogical assessment
References:
1. Goncharova V. A., Abramova G. S. Sotsialisaziya v megapolise; vyzov pedagogcheskomu obrazovaniyu? [Socialization in megapolic: is it a challenge for teachers’ training education?]. Mir nauki, kultury, obrazovaniya – World of science, culture, education, 2019, vol. 1 (74), pp. 34–37 (in Russian).
2. Zborovsky G. E., Kuzminchuk A. A. Obrazovatel’nyye i vneobrazovatel’nyye resursy razvitiya studenchestva v megapolise [Educational and non educational resources for developing students in megapolis]. Pedagogicheskiy zhurnal Bashkortostana – Pedagogical journal of Bashkortostan, 2017, vol. 2 (69), pp. 27–35 (in Russian).
3. Kuleshova G. I. Universitet i gorod. Ocherk evolyutsii svyazi universitetskoy institutsii s gorodskoy sredoy. Chast’ I: Mirovoy opyt [University and city. Essay on the evolution of the connection between the university institution and the urban environment. Part 1: World experience]. Akademiya. Arkhitektura i stroitel’stvo – Academia. Architecture and construction, 2021, vol. 4, pp. 70–79 (in Russian). DOI 10.22337/2077-9038-2021-4-70-79
4. Kuleshova G. I. Universitet i gorod. Ocherk evolyutsii svyazi universitetskoy institutsii s gorodskoy sredoy. Chast’ II: Osobennosti formirovaniya rossiyskikh universitetov, sovremennoye sostoyaniye, model’ mezhuniversitetskogo kampusa [University and city. Essay on the evolution of the connection between the university institution and the urban environment. Part II: Features of the formation of Russian universities, current state, model of an interuniversity campus]. Akademiya. Arkhitektura i stroitel’stvo – Academia. Architecture and Construction, 2022, vol. 1, pp. 115–123 (in Russian). DOI 10.22337/2077-9038-2022-1-115-123
5. Asonova E. A., Kikteva K. S., Rossinskaya A. N. “Pravo na kul’turu”: opyt integratsii resursov muzeyev v obrazovatel’nyy protsess [Cultural Rights: Experience of Integrating Museum Resources into Education]. Vestnik Moskovskogo gorodskogo pedagogicheskogo universiteta. Seriya: Pedagogika i psikhologiya – Vestnik MCU. Series: Pedagogy and Psychology, 2018, no. 2 (44), pp. 63–77 (in Russian).
6. Cabała A., Grzelak A. In search of the museum – school cooperation model: face culture programme of the National museum in Cracow. Muzealnictwo, 2020, no. 61, pp. 10–20. DOI: 10.5604/01.3001.0013.9514
7. McGregor S. et al. Now and the future. A review of formal learning in museums. Arts Council England, 2016.
8. Shelby K. Collaborations: museums and higher education. Art History Teaching Resources, 2021, October, 11. URL: http://arthistoryteachingresources.org/2013/05/857/ (accessed 17 January 2023).
9. Cueva-Ortiz S., Cruz-Cárdenas J. Knowledge Cities: ICT and Urban Components. In: Markopoulos E., Goonetilleke R. S., Ho A. G., Luximon Y. (eds) Advances in Creativity, Innovation, Entrepreneurship and Communication of Design. AHFE 2021. Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems, 2021, vol. 276, pp. 181–188. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-80094-9_22
10. Langran E., DeWitt J. Navigating Placed-Based Learning. Palgrave Macmillan, 2020.
11. Macdonald S. Place-Based Learning as a High Impact Educational Practice. In: R. D. Lansiquot (Ed.). Interdisciplinary Team Teaching. Palgrave McMillan, 2020. Pp. 41–56.
12. Smith G. A. Place-Based Education: Learning to Be Where We are. Phi Delta Kappa, 2002, no. 83 (8), pp. 584–594. URL: https://doi.org/10.1177/003172170208300806
13. Dvir R., Pasher E. Innovation engines for knowledge cities: an innovation ecology perspective. Journal of Knowledge Management, 2004, no. 8 (5), pp. 16–27. URL: https://doi.org/10.1108/13673270410558756
14. Edvinsson L. Knowledge City Stockholm @ the forefront. In: Formica P. (eds) Entrepreneurial Renaissance. Innovation, Technology, and Knowledge Management. Springer, Cham, 2017. Pp. 101–112. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-52660-7_6
15. Hu R. The Shenzhen Phenomenon: From Fishing Village to Global Knowledge City. Routledge. URL: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780367815653
16. Asonova E. A., Rossinskaya A. N. Ispol’zovaniye resursov goroda v obrazovanii: vyzovy i resheniya [Using City Resources in Education: Challenges and Solutions]. UniverCity: Goroda i Universitety [University: Cities and Universities]. Moscow, Ekoninform Publ., 2018. Pp. 35–46 (in Russian).
17. Asonova E. A., Rossinskaya A. N., Bulanov M. V. Kak gorod mozhet i dolzhen izmenit’ pedagogicheskoye obrazovaniye [How City Can and Must Change Teachers’ Education]. UniverCity: Goroda i Universitety [University: Cities and Universities]. Moscow, Ekon-inform Publ., 2020. Pp. 31–48 (in Russian).
18. Bulanov M. V., Rossinskaya A. N., Asonova E. A. Obrazovatel’naya urbanistika: opyt opisaniya klyuchevykh ponyatiy [Educational Urban Studies: Approach to Defining Key Concepts]. Nauchno-pedagogicheskoye obozreniye – Scientific-Pedagogical Review, 2021, vol. 6 (40), pp. 236–245 (in Russian). DOI 10.23951/2307-6127-2021-6-236-245
19. Asonova E. A., Bulanov M. V., Rossinskaya A. N. Gorod kak yestestvennaya sreda obrazovaniya [City as a natural educational environment]. UniverCity: Goroda i Universitety [University: Cities and Universities]. Moscow, Ekon-Inform Publ., 2022. Pp. 25–38 (in Russian).
20. Ivanova E. V., Mayakova E. V. Mezhdunarodnyy instrumentariy otsenki kachestva obrazovatel’noy sredy [International Instrument for Evaluating the Quality of Educational Environment]. Materialy mezhdunarodnoy nauchno-prakticheskoy konferentsii [Materials of International Research-practical Conference]. Saransk, Mordovskiy gosudarstvennyy pedagogicheskiy institut imeni M. E. Evsev’eva Publ., 2017. Pp. 194–202 (in Russian).
21. Ivanova E. V., Vinogradova I. A. Vozmozhnosti issledovaniya obrazovatel’noy sredy shkoly s ispol’zovaniyem shkaly SACERS [Opportunities to Research Educational Environment of School Using SACERS Scales]. God ekologii v Rossii: pedagogika i psikhologiya v interesakh ustoychivogo razvitiya [A Year of Ecology in Russia: Pedagogy and Psychology for Sustainable Development]. Moscow, Pero Publ., 2017. Pp. 236–240 (in Russian).
22. Ivanova E. V., Vinogradova I. A. Otsenivaniye usloviy realizatsii osnovnoy obrazovatel’noy programmy nachal’nogo i osnovnogo obshchego obrazovaniya s ispol’zovaniyem mezhdunarodnoy shkaly SACERS [Evaluating of Conditions of Implementing General Education Program of Elementary and Secondary Education Using International Scales SAKERS]. Vestnik Moskovskogo gorodskogo pedagogicheskogo universiteta. Seriya: Pedagogika i psihologiya – MCU Journal of Pedagogy and Psychology, 2017, no. 4 (42), pp. 66–79 (in Russian).
23. Ivanova E. V., Vinogradova I. A., Mayakova E. V. Ekspertnoye otsenivaniye obrazovatel’noy sredy shkoly s ispol’zovaniyem mezhdunarodnoy shkaly SACERS: nauchno-metodicheskoye posobiye [Expert Evaluation of Educational Environment of Schools Using International SACERS Scales: scientific and methodological manual]. Moscow, MCU Publ., 2019. 108 p. (in Russian).
24. Ivanova E. V., Vinogradova I. A. Scales SACERS: Results of the Study of the Educational Environment of Moscow Schools. European Journal of Contemporary Education, 2018, vol. 7, no. 3, pp. 498–510 (in Russian). DOI 10.13187/ejced.2018.3.498
25. Harms T., Klifford R. M., Krajer. D. Shkaly dlya kompleksnoy otsenki kachestva obrazovaniya v doshkol’nykh obrazovatel’nykh organizatsiyakh [Scales for Complex Evaluation of the Quality of Education in Pre-school Educational Organizations]. Moscow, Natsional’noye obrazovaniye Publ., 2018. 136 p.
26. Harms T., Jacobs V., White D. School-Age Care Environment Rating Scale (SACERS). Teachers College Press, 2013.
27. Russian Patent No. 2017620679 Nauchno-metodicheskiye materialy dlya provedeniya otsenki sotsiokul’turnykh obrazovatel’nykh interaktivnykh praktik [Research-method Materials for Evaluation of Sociocultural Educational Practices]. 2017 (in Russian).
28. Porozov R. Yu. Kul’turno-obrazovatel’noye prostranstvo goroda [Cultural-educational Environment of the City]. Yekaterinburg, USPU Publ., 2012. 174 p. (in Russian).
29. Bayeva I.A. Psikhologicheskaya bezopasnost’ v obrazovanii [Psychological Safety in Education]. Moscow, Ekon-Inform Publ., 2009. 246 p. (in Russian).
30. Niyazbayeva N. N. Psikhologicheskoye obosnovaniye obespecheniya komforta mladshikh shkol’nikov v obrazovatel’noy deyatel’nosti [Psychological Basis of Providing Comfort for Elementary School Students in Educational Activities]. Psikhologicheskaya nauka i obrazovaniye – Psychological Science and Research, 2009, no. 3, pp. 1–17 (in Russian).
31. Federal’nyy zakon Rossiyskoy Federatsii ot 29 dekabrya 2010 g. no. 436-FZ “O zashchite detey ot informatsii, prichinyayushchey vred ikh zdorov’yu i razvitiyu” [Federal Law of the Russian Federation 29.12.2010 No. 436-FZ “About Child Protection From Information Harmful for Health and Development”] (in Russian).
32. GOST R 58178-2018 Sokhraneniye ob’’yektov kul’turnogo naslediya. Dostupnost’ ob’’yektov kul’turnogo naslediya dlya malomobil’nykh grupp naseleniya [Preserving Object of Cultural Heritage. Accessibility of Objects of Cultural Heritage for Persons with Reduced Mobility]. Moscow, Standartinform Publ., 2019. 12 p. (in Russian).
( 427.44 kB ) 
( 419.39 kB )
Issue: 2, 2023
Series of issue: Issue 2
Rubric: PROBLEMS OF EDUCATION
Pages: 33 — 42
Downloads: 559