CRITICAL DISCOURSE ABOUT GOGOL IN THE “BOGOSLOVSKIY VESTNIK” OF THE BEGINNING OF THE XX CENTURY
DOI: 10.23951/1609-624X-2022-6-108-120
Introduction. The Orthodox periodicals of the era of the turn of the 19th – 20th centuries, being an integral part of domestic journalism, contain a large corpus of publications dedicated to domestic and foreign writers, incl. N. V. Gogol.Turning to the critical discourse about Gogol, presented on the pages of pre-revolutionary church journals, will clarify the issue of the perception of the personality and work of the writer in scientific and theological circles, and will also help build a holistic picture of Gogol’s reception in criticism of the frontier era. The purpose of the article is to study the critical reception of the personality and creativity of N. V. Gogol in church academic periodicals of the early 20th century. Material and methods. The material of the study was the articles of the “Bogoslovskiy vestnik” of the late 19th – early 20th century, dedicated to Gogol, as well as publications of various genres containing reflections or background references to Gogol and his works. Journal materials are analyzed in the historical and literary aspect, and are also considered from the standpoint of receptive aesthetics and the sociology of literature. Results and discussion. Based on the results of the study, a conclusion was made about the specifics of Gogol’s critical reception in the journal of the Moscow Theological Academy, the chronology of which covers about 17 years. The most active phase of the perception of Gogol’s personality and work in the “Bogoslovskiy vestnik” falls on the period of his anniversaries in 1902 and 1909, when literary critical studies of teachers and professors of the Academy dedicated to him were published, as well as materials from a literary evening dedicated to the centenary of the birth of the writer. Outside of Gogol’s anniversaries, critical discourse about the writer includes articles on scientific and theological issues, but containing reflections on the writer’s religious outlook and his artistic work, as well as materials (letters, memoirs etc.) in which there are only brief mentions of the writer. The mechanisms of Gogol’s critical reception in “Bogoslovskiy vestnik” are determined by the desire to comprehend the “mysterious personality” of the writer, his “complex inner world”, as well as to evaluate his contribution to the formation of Russian religious culture. Conclusion. The image of Gogol, presented on the pages of the “Bogoslovskiy vestnik”, reflects the contradictions in the perception of his personality and work, which are generally characteristic of literary criticism at the turn of the century, when the writer either continued to be accused, calling him an “apostle of ignorance” and a reactionary, or defended, seeing in him an ascetic artist and a serious thinker.
Keywords: N. V. Gogol, critical reception, “Bogoslovskiy vestnik”, church periodicals, writer’s anniversary, literary reputation, spiritual prose, the concept of “two Gogols”
References:
1. Mandzyuk-Ilinskiy V. N. “Trudy Kiyevskoy dukhovnoy akademii” – pravoslavnyy bogoslovskiy zhurnal (1860–1917 gg.): istoriko-tipologicheskiy analiz. Dis. kand. filol. nauk [“Proceedings of the Kyiv Theological Academy” – Orthodox theological journal (1860–1917): historical and typological analysis. Diss. cand. philol. sci.]. Мoscow, 2015. 209 p. (in Russian).
2. Svetlov P. Ya., prot. Ideya Tsarstva Bozhiya i yeye znacheniye dlya khristianskogo mirosozertsaniya: bogoslovsko-аpologeticheskoye issledovaniye [Ponyatie о Tsаrstve Bozhiem]. [The idea of the Kingdom of God in its meaning for the Christian worldview: Theological and apologetic study. [The concept of the kingdom of God]. Bogoslovskiy vestnik, 1902, vol. 3, no. 11, pp. 257–290 (in Russian).
3. Таrеyеv М. М. Тipy rеligiozno-nravstvennoy zhizni: probnaya lektsiya [Types of religious and moral life: Trial lecture]. Bogoslovskiy vestnik, 1902, vol. 3, no. 9, pp. 42–81 (in Russian).
4. Kuznetsov N. D. Russkaya khudozhestvennaya literatura v yeye otnoshenii k voprosam religii [Russian Fiction in its Relation to Religious Issues]. Bogoslovskiy vestnik, 1910, vol. 3, no. 10, pp. 333–352 (in Russian).
5. Bеrкоv P. N. Iz materialov pushkinskogo yubileya 1899 goda [From the materials of the Pushkin anniversary of 1899]. Pushkin: Vremennik pushkinskoy коmissii [Pushkin: temporary of the Pushkin commission]. Мoscow, Leningrad, Izdatel’stvo АN SSSR Publ., 1937 [Vol. 3]. Pp. 401–414 (in Russian).
6. Tatarskiy I. A. Aleksandr Sergeyevich Pushkin kak natsional’nyy poet [Alexander Sergeevich Pushkin as Russian National Poet]. Bogoslovskiy vestnik, 1899, vol. 2, no. 6, pp. 239–249 (in Russian).
7. Voskresenskiy G. A. Velichiye Pushkina kak poeta i cheloveka: rech’ v torzhestvennom sobranii v chest’ A. S. Pushkina, 26 maya. [The greatness of Pushkin as a poet and a person: Speech at a solemn meeting in honor of A. S. Pushkin, 26 may]. Bogoslovskiy vestnik, 1899, vol. 2, no. 6, pp. 212–238 (in Russian).
8. Nevskaya D. R. Tri fazisa priznaniya i uvenchaniya. K istorii pervykh yubileyev Gogolya [Three phases of recognition and crowning. To the history of the first anniversaries of Gogol]. Novyy filologicheskiy vestnik – The New Philological Bulletin, 2013, no. 1 (24), pp. 106–139 (in Russian).
9. Pypin A. N. Istoriya russkoy literatury: v 4 t. [History of Russian Literature: in 4 volumes]. Saint Petersburg, Tipografiya Stasuylеvicha Publ., 1898–1899, vol. 4. 1899. 654 p. (in Russian).
10. Shenrok V. I. Materialy dlya biografii Gogolya: v 4 t. [Materials for the biography of Gogol: in 4 volumes]. Moscow, Tipografiya А. I. Mаmоntоvа i К. Publ., 1892–1897 (in Russian).
11. Shenrok V. I. Gogol kak khudozhnik [Gogol as an artist]. Кiеv, Tipografiya Universiteta sv. Vladimira АО N. Т. Коrchак-Nоvitsкоgо Publ., 1902. P. 14 (in Russian).
12. Voskresenskiy G. A. Po povodu pyatidesyatiletiya so dnya konchiny N. V. Gogolya i V. A. Zhukovskogo (21 fevralya i 12 aprelya 1852 g.) [On the fiftieth anniversary of the death of N. V. Gogol and V. A. Zhukovsky (February 21 and April 12, 1852)]. Bogoslovskiy vestnik, 1902, vol. 1, no. 3, pp. 596–620 (in Russian).
13. Polevoy P. N. Gogol. Opyt harakteristiki [Gogol. Experience Characteristics]. Istoricheskiy vestnik. Istoriko-literaturnyy zhurnal, 1902, vol. 87, pp. 583–589 (in Russian).
14. Nоvа N. М. Velikiy yumorist i podvizhnik (po sluchayu pyatidesyatiletiya so dnya konchiny N. V. Gogolya) [Great humorist and ascetic (on the occasion of the 50th anniversary of the death of N. V. Gogol). Vestnik vsemirnoy istorii, 1902, vol. 2, pp. 20–38 (in Russian).
15. Minin P. М. K kharakteristike lichnosti Gogolya [To the characterization of Gogol’s personality]. Bogoslovskiy vestnik, 1902, vol. 1, no. 3, pp. 621–637 (in Russian).
16. Minin P. М. K kharakteristike literaturnoy deyatel’nosti Zhukovskogo [To the characterization of Zhukovsky’s literary activity]. Bogoslovskiy vestnik, 1902, vol. 4. pp. 766–787 (in Russian).
17. Minin P. М. Mistitsizm i yego priroda [Mysticism and its nature]. Bogoslovskiy vestnik, 1911, vol. 1, no. 4, pp. 795–817; vol. 2, no. 5, pp. 85–112 (in Russian).
18. Minin P. М. Glavnyye napravleniya drevnetserkovnoy mistiki [The main directions of ancient church mysticism]. Bogoslovskiy vestnik, 1911, vol. 3, no. 12, pp. 823–838 (in Russian).
19. Bazhenov N. N. Bolezn’ i smert’ Gogolya [Illness and death of Gogol]. Russkaya mysl’, 1902, no. 1, pp. 132–149 (in Russian).
20. Bazhenov N. N. Bolezn’ i smert’ Gogolya [Illness and death of Gogol]. Russkaya mysl’, 1902, no. 2, pp. 52–71 (in Russian).
21. Minin P. М. K kharakteristike lichnosti Gogolya [To the characterization of Gogol’s personality]. Bogoslovskiy vestnik, 1902, vol. 1, no. 3, pp. 621–637 (in Russian).
22. Tsirkulyary Ministerstva narodnogo prosveshcheniya [Circulars of the Ministry of Public Education]. 1902. Vol. 340. Pp. 18–72 (in Russian).
23. Svetlov P. Ya., prot. Ideya Tsarstva Bozhiya i ee znachenie dlya khristianskogo mirosozertsaniya: bogoslovsko-аpologeticheskoye issledovaniye [Ponyatie о Tsаrstve Bozhiem]. [The idea of the Kingdom of God in its meaning for the Christian worldview: Theological and apologetic study. [The concept of the kingdom of God]. Bogoslovskiy vestnik, 1903, vol. 1, no. 3, pp. 463–498 (in Russian).
24. Zen’kovskiy V. V. Istoriya russkoy filosofii [History of Russian Philosophy]. Leningrad, Ego Publ., 1991. Vol. 1. Part 1. 221 p. (in Russian).
25. Svetlov P. Ya., prot. Ideya Tsarstva Bozhiya v yeyo znachenii dlya khristianskogo mirosozertsaniya: bogoslovsko-аpologeticheskoye issledovaniye [Ponyatie о Tsаrstve Bozhiem] [The idea of the Kingdom of God in its meaning for the Christian worldview: Theological and apologetic study [The concept of the kingdom of God]]. Bogoslovskiy vestnik, 1902, vol. 2, no. 5, pp. 40–73 (in Russian).
26. Svetlov P. Ya., prot. O poseshchenii teatra dukhovenstvom: k voprosu o vzaimnykh otnosheniyakh khristianstva i kul’tury [About visiting the theater by the clergy: on the question of the mutual relations of Christianity and culture]. Bogoslovskiy vestnik, 1906, vol. 1, no. 3, pp. 570–576 (in Russian).
27. Gogol N. V. Vybrannyye mesta iz perepiski s druz’yami [Selected places from correspondence with friends]. In: Gogol N. V. Polnoye sobraniye sochineniy i pisem v 17 tomakh. T. 6. Vybrannyye mesta iz perepiski s druz’yami. Dukhovnaya proza. Kritika. Publitsistika [Complete Works and Letters: in 17 volumes. Vol. 6. Selected places from correspondence with friends. Spiritual prose. Criticism. Publicism]. Moscow, Izdatel’stvo Moskovskoy Patriarkhii Publ., 2009. 742 p. (in Russian).
28. Lavrskiy V., prot. Moi vospominaniya ob arkhimandrite Feodore (A. M. Bukhareve) [My memories of Archimandrite Theodore (A. M. Bukhareve)]. Bogoslovskiy vestnik, 1902, vol. 2, no. 5, pp. 98–128 (in Russian).
29. Belorukov A. M., svyashch. Vnutrenniy perelom v zhizni A. M. Bukhareva (arhim. Feodora) [An internal turning point in the life of A. M. Bukharev (Archim. Theodor)]. Bogoslovskiy vestnik, 1915, vol. 3, no. 10/11/12, pp. 785–867 (in Russian).
30. Leont’ev K. N. Pis’ma k Anatoliyu Aleksandrovu: [III–XIII: 9 noyabrya, 8 i 21 dekabrya 1887 g., 15 yanvarya, 1 i 5 fevralya, 20 i 30 marta, 14, 19 i 26 aprelya 1888 g.]. Soobshchil A. A. Aleksandrov [Letters to Anatoly Alexandrov: [III–XIII: November 9, December 8 and 21, 1887, January 15, February 1 and 5, March 20 and 30, April 14, 19 and 26, 1888]. Reported by A. A. Alexandrov]. Bogoslovskiy vestnik, 1914, vol. 1, no. 4. pp. 771–792 (in Russian).
31. Durylin S. Nachal’nik tishiny [Head of Silence]. Bogoslovskiy vestnik, 1916, vol. 2, no. 7/8, pp. 417–445 (in Russian).
( 758.84 kB ) 
( 742.99 kB )
Issue: 6, 2022
Series of issue: Issue 6
Rubric: LITERARY STUDIES
Pages: 108 — 120
Downloads: 378