PROJECT METHOD IN TRAINING FUTURE ENGINEERS IN RESEARCH SKILLS WITH INTERNATIONAL DATABASES
DOI: 10.23951/1609-624X-2022-5-95-106
Introduction. At present, competition between countries is in the field of technology, and one who has the ability to quickly acquire knowledge and translate it into technology will be able to provide leadership to his country. The share of Russian high technologies in the world market is very small, about one percent. Therefore, the training of next generation engineers needs to be transformed as a priority. Science is the foundation of engineering education. An engineer of the 21st century is an “innovative engineer”, a developer who must have research skills, the ability to obtain and apply scientific information in professional activities. Searching scientometric databases with the greatest efficiency and effectiveness is an important skill for a modern engineer. International databases allow you to get up-to-date scientific knowledge, keep abreast of trends in engineering activities, new ideas, contributing to the creation of unique technologies. Systematic work with Scopus and Web of Science is one of the opportunities for Lifelong learning, development of the general and professional potential of the individual. But numerous surveys show that there are gaps in training future engineers to work with Web of Science and Scopus databases. The aim is to substantiate the effectiveness of project-based learning for the formation of research skills in working with international Scopus and WoS databases among future engineers. Material and methods. Theoretical methods were used in the work – abstraction, analysis, concretization, generalization; empirical methods – participant observation, reflective interview, experiment, study of the products of educational activity. The analysis of scientific research devoted to the ideas of philosophical, pedagogical and psychological science, which determine the effectiveness of project-based learning for the formation of research skills for working with international databases in future engineers, has been carried out. The methodological basis of the study was an activity-based, person-oriented approach, a theoretical analysis of scientific literature, and a generalization of the results of the study. Results and discussion. The results of approbation of project training for future engineers of Tomsk State University of Control Systems and Radioelectronics for the formation of research skills in working with international databases within the framework of the discipline “Fundamentals of project activities” are presented. Conclusion. The project method for training future engineers contributes to the formation of research skills in working with international databases.
Keywords: Scopus, Web of Science, project-based learning, future engineers, research skills
References:
1. Ivanov V. G., Kaybiyaynen A. A., Miftakhutdinova L. T. Inzhenernoye obrazovaniye v tsyfrovom mire [Engineering education in a digital world]. Vyssheye obrazovaniye v Rossii – Higher Education in Russia, 2017, no. 12, pp. 136–143 (in Russian).
2. Yushko S. V., Galikhanov M. F., Kondrat’ev V. V. Integrativnaya podgotovka budushchikh inzhenerov k innovatsyonnoy deyatel’nosti dlya postindustrial’noy ekonomiki [Integrative training of future engineers for innovative activities for the post-industrial economy]. Vyssheye obrazovaniye v Rossii – Higher Education in Russia, 2019, vol. 28, no. 1, pp. 65–75 (in Russian).
3. Koryagina E. D. O perspektivnykh modelyakh razvitiya nauki i vysshego obrazovaniya na period do 2035 g. [On promising models for the development of science and higher education for the period up to 2035]. Innovatsii i investitsii, 2020, no. 7, pp. 34–38 (in Russian).
4. Prioritet 2030 [Priority 2030] (in Russian). URL: https://priority2030.ru/about (accessed 22 March 2022).
5. Ot goda nauki i tekhnologiy k dekade [From the year of science and technology to the decade] (in Russian). URL: https://indicator.ru/humanitarian-science/ot-goda-nauki-i-tekhnologii-k-dekade.htm (accessed 22 March 2022).
6. Aleksandr Sergeev: Rossiya vsegda nakhodila vykhod iz bezvykhodnykh situatsiy [Alexander Sergeev: Russia has always found a way out of hopeless situations] (in Russian). URL: https://rg.ru/2022/03/15/aleksandr-sergeev-rossiia-vsegda-nahodila-vyhod-iz-bezvyhodnyh-situacij.html (accessed 22 March 2022).
7. Kampus kak magnit dlya molodykh uchenykh [Campus as a magnet for young scientists] (in Russian). URL: https://skillbox.ru/media/education/kampus-kak-magnit-dlya-molodykh-uchyenykh-novye-porucheniya-prezidenta/ (accessed 22 March 2022).
8. Chuchalin A. I. Inzhenernoe obrazovanie v epokhu industrial’noy revolyutsii i tsyfrovoy economiki [Engineering education in the era of the industrial revolution and the digital economy]. Vyssheye obrazovaniye v Rossii – Higher Education in Russia, 2018, vol. 27, no. 10, pp. 47–62 (in Russian).
9. Leont’ev A. N. Deyatel’nost’. Soznaniye. Lichnost’ [Activity. Consciousness. Personality]. Moscow, Politizdat Publ., 1975 (in Russian). URL: https://www.marxists.org/russkij/leontiev/1975/dyeatyelnost/deyatyelnost-soznyanie-lichnost.pdf (accessed 22 March 2022).
10. Serikov V. V. Obrazovaniye i lichnost’. Teoriya i praktika proektirovaniya pedagogicheskikh system [Education and personality. Theory and practice of designing pedagogical systems]. Moscow, Logos Publ., 1999. 272 p. (in Russian).
11. Rodzhers K., Freyberg D. Svoboda uchit’sya: 2-e izd. [Freedom to learn]. Translation from English by A. B. Orlov. Moscow, Smysl Publ., 2019. 527 p. (in Russian).
12. Yushkov A. N., Agramakova O. V. Proekty i issledovaniya dlya razvitiya nauchnykh i inzhenernykh umeniy [Projects and research to develop scientific and engineering skills]. Obrazovatel’naya politika, 2020, no. S5, pp. 25–33 (in Russian).
13. Maladzhi R. W., Kanakana-Katumba G. M. Evolution of teaching approaches for science, engineering and technology within an online environment: A review. Advances in Science, Technology and Engineering Systems, 2020, vol. 5, no 6, pp. 1207–1216.
14. Rybina I. R., Popova I. Yu. Proektnoye obucheniye kak element organizatsii uchebnoy deyatel’nosti v kontekste sovremennogo obrazovaniya [Project-based learning as an element of the organization of educational activities in the context of modern education]. Uchenye zapiski Orlovskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta, 2014, no. 4 (60), pp. 299–302 (in Russian).
15. Trishchenko D. A. Opyt proektnogo obucheniya: popytka ob’ektivnogo analiza dostizheniy i problem [Project-Based Learning Experience: An Attempt to Objectively Analyze Achievements and Problems]. Obrazovaniye i nauka – Education and Science, 2018, vol. 20, no. 4, pp. 132–152 (in Russian).
16. Muller O. Yu. Teoreticheskie i prakticheskie aspekty vnedreniya proektnogo obucheniya v vuze [Theoretical and practical aspects of the implementation of project-based learning at the university]. Gumanitarno-pedagogicheskiye issledovaniya, 2021, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 6–9 (in Russian).
17. Gyasi J. F., Zheng L., Zhou Y. Perusing the past to propel the future: A systematic review of STEM learning activity based on activity theory. Sustainability, 2021, vol. 13, no. 16, Article number 8828, pp. 1–27.
18. Rahman N. A., Rosli R., Rambely A. S., Halim L. Mathematics teachers’ practices of STEM education: A systematic literature review. European Journal of Educational Research, 2021, vol. 10, no. 3, pp. 1541–1559.
19. Amo D., Fox P., Fonseca D., Poyatos C. Systematic review on which analytics and learning methodologies are applied in primary and secondary education in the learning of robotics sensors. Sensors, 2021, vol. 21, no. 1, Article number 153, pp. 1–21.
20. Popova T. A. Proektnaya deyatel’nost’: motivatsiya i opaseniya studentov. Problemnoye obucheniye dlya pokoleniya Z [Project activity: motivation and fears of students. Problem-Based Learning for Generation Z]. Sbornik statey-dokladov uchastnikov XVII Mezhdunarodnoy nauchno-prakticheskoy konferentsii “Novaya psikhologiya professional’nogo truda pedagoga: ot nestabil’noy real’nosti k ustoychivomu razvitiyu” [Collection of articles-reports of the participants of the XVII International scientific-practical conference “New psychology of professional work of a teacher: from unstable reality to sustainable development”]. Moscow, PI RAO Publ., 2021. Pp. 141–144 (in Russian).
21. Charikova I. N. Obrazovatel’naya proektnost’ kak resurs povysheniya kachestva podgotovki budushchikh inzhenerov [Educational design as a resource for improving the quality of training of future engineers]. Samarskiy nauchnyy vestnik – Samara Journal of Science, 2020, vol. 9, no. 1 (30), pp. 293–300 (in Russian).
22. Volegzhanina I. S., Zaytseva T. S., Stepachkova I. I. Skvoznoy mezhdistsiplinarnyi proekt kak tekhnologiya stanovleniya i razvitiya professional’noy kompetentnosti budushchego inzhenera [A cross-cutting interdisciplinary project as a technology for the formation and development of the professional competence of a future engineer]. Mezhdunarodnyy zhurnal gumanitarnykh i estestvennykh nauk, 2021, no. 9–2 (60), pp. 22–28 (in Russian).
23. Higuera Martinez O. I., Fernandez-Samaca L., Serrano Cardenas L. F. Trends and opportunities by fostering creativity in science and engineering: a systematic review. European Journal of Engineering Education, 2021, vol. 46, no. 6, pp. 1117–1140.
24. Alvarez-Huerta P., Muela A., Larrea I. Disposition toward critical thinking and creative confidence beliefs in higher education students: The mediating role of openness to diversity and challenge. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 2022, vol. 43, Article number 101003, pp. 1–9.
25. Sola E., Hoekstra R., Fiore S., McCauley P. An Investigation of the State of Creativity and Critical Thinking in Engineering Undergraduates. Creative Education, 2017, vol. 8, no. 9, pp. 1495–1522.
26. Cropley D. H. Promoting creativity and innovation in engineering education. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 2015, vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 161–171.
27. Atwood S. A., Pretz J. E. Creativity as a Factor in Persistence and Academic Achievement of Engineering Undergraduates. Journal of Engineering Education, 2016, vol. 105, no. 4, pp. 540–559.
28. Kazarbin A. V., Lunina Yu. V. Nauchno-issledovatel’skaya rabota studentov kak factor razvitiya inzhenernogo myshleniya [Research work of students as a factor in the development of engineering thinking]. Problemy sovremennogo obrazovaniya – Problems of Modern Education, 2020, no. 3, pp. 124–131 (in Russian).
29. Ryndak V. G., Sayfutdinova G. S. Aktual’nost’ programmy formirovaniya kreativnosti budushchego inzhenera na osnove nauchnogo poiska [The relevance of the program for the formation of creativity of the future engineer based on scientific research]. Vestnik Samarskogo gosudarstvennogo tekhnicheskogo universiteta. Seriya: Psikhologo-pedagogicheskiye nauki – Vestnik of Samara State Technical University. Series: Psychological and Pedagogical Sciences, 2021, vol. 18, no. 2, pp. 113–121 (in Russian).
30. Fedorova M. A., Tsyguleva M. V. Predstavleniye rabotodatelya o znachimykh nauchno-issledovatel’skikh kompetentsiyakh vypusknikov inzhenernykh vuzov [Employer’s perception of significant research competencies of engineering graduates]. Vestnik Sibirskogo instituta biznesa i informatsyonnykh tekhnologiy, 2017, no. 3 (23), pp. 89–96 (in Russian).
31. Reddy R. C., Bhattacharjee B., Mishra D., Mandal A. A systematic literature review towards a conceptual framework for enablers and barriers of an enterprise data science strategy. Information Systems and e-Business Management, 2022, Article number 1139. P. 1–33.
32. Sivarajah U., Kamal M. M., Irani Z., Weerakkody V. Critical analysis of Big Data challenges and analytical methods. Journal of Business Research, 2017, vol. 70, pp. 263–286.
33. Safonova M. A., Safonov A. A. Transfomatsiya akademicheskogo pis’ma v tsyfrovuyu epokhu [Transforming Academic Writing in the Digital Age]. Vyssheye obrazovaniye v Rossii – Higher Educqtion in Russia, 2021, vol. 30, no. 2, pp. 144–153 (in Russian).
34. Kuvayeva M. M., Musin Sh. R., Valeyeva G. Kh. Soderzhatel’nye komponenty inzhenernoy kul’tury budushchikh bakalavrov tekhnicheskikh napravleniy [Content components of the engineering culture of future bachelors of technical fields]. Problemy sovremennogo pedagogicheskogo obrazovaniya, 2021, no. 71–3, pp. 62–65 (in Russian).
35. Menedzher 2.0: chto vazhno znat’ i umet’ rukovoditelyu tsyfrovoy epokhi [Manager 2.0: what is important to know and be able to manage in the digital age] (in Russian). URL: https://www.hse.ru/news/community/422161429.html (accessed 22 March 2022).
36. Prasetiyo W. H., Naidu N. B. M., Tan B. P., Sumardjoko B. Digital citizenship trend in educational sphere: A systematic review. International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education, 2021, vol. 10, no. 4, pp. 1192–1201.
37. Top-15 kompetentsiy i navykov v tsyfrovoy sfere [Top 15 Digital Competencies and Skills] (in Russian). URL: https://issek.hse.ru/news/540276172.html (accessed 22 March 2022).
38. Kak izmenilos’ otnosheniye k obucheniyu: trendy postkovidnogo vremeni [How attitudes towards learning have changed: post-COVID trends] (in Russian). URL: https://theoryandpractice.ru/posts/19556-kak-izmenilos-otnoshenie-k-obucheniyu-trendy-postkovidnogo-vremeni?utm_medium=rss&utm_source=rss (accessed 22 March 2022).
39. Gusenbauer M., Haddaway N. R. Which academic search systems are suitable for systematic reviews or metaanalyses? Evaluating retrieval qualities of Google Scholar, PubMed, and 26 other resources. Research Synthesis Methods, 2020, vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 181–217. URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/jrsm.1378 (accessed 22 March 2022).
40. Selwyn N. Data entry: towards the critical study of digital data and education. Learning, Media and Technology, 2015, vol. 40, no. 1, pp. 64–82.
41. Vasil’eva V. A., Vasil’eva V. S. Novye podkhody k prepodavaniyu zarubezhnykh informatsionnykh resursov v vuze [New approaches to teaching foreign information resources at the university]. Nauka i nauchnaya informatsiya – Scolarrly Reserch and Information, 2019, no. 2 (3), pp. 167–180 (in Russian).
42. RFFI publikuet rezul’taty oprosa “Onlain-instrumenty dlya poiska akademicheskikh publikatsiy” [RFBR publishes the results of the survey “Online Tools for Searching Academic Publications”] (in Russian). URL: https://www.rfbr.ru/rffi/ru/news_events/o_2113982 (accessed 22 March 2022).
43. Galyaviyeva M. S., Elizarov A. M. Informetriya v mirovoy sisteme vysshego obrazovaniya [Informetria in the world system of higher education]. Nauchno-technicheskaya informatsiya: Seriya 1: Organizatsiya i metodika informatsionnoy raboty, 2017, no. 12, pp. 8–13 (in Russian).
44. Agamirzyan I. R., Kruk E. A., Prokhorova V. B. Nekotorye sovremennye podkhody k inzhenernomu obrazovaniyu [Some modern approaches to engineering education]. Vysshee obrazovanie v Rossii, 2017, no. 11, pp. 43–48 (in Russian).
45. Brinkmann S. Doing Without Data. Qualitative Inquiry, 2014, vol. 20, no. 6, pp. 720–725.
46. Gillingham P., Graham T. Big Data in Social Welfare: The Development of a Critical Perspective on Social Work’s Latest “Electronic Turn”. Australian Social Work, 2017, vol. 70, no. 2, pp. 135–147.
47. Kazun A. P., Pastukhova L. S. Praktiki primeneniya proektnogo metoda obucheniya: opyt raznykh stran [Practices of application of the project-based teaching method: experience of different countries]. Obrazovaniye i nauka – Education and Science, 2018, vol. 20, no. 2, pp. 32–59 (in Russian).
48. Kugayevskiy S. S. Proektnoye obucheniye studentov i nauchno-issledovatel’skaya deyatel’nost’ vuza [Project training of students and research activities of the university]. Inzhenernoye obrazovaniye – Engeneering Edication, 2017, no. 22, pp. 130–135 (in Russian).
( 752.18 kB ) 
( 736.73 kB )
Issue: 5, 2022
Series of issue: Issue 5
Rubric: EDUCATIONAL TECHNOLOGIES
Pages: 95 — 106
Downloads: 418