MODELING OF THE INFORMATION SYSTEM FOR THE SUPPORT OF THE UNIVERSITY EDUCATIONAL PROCESS
DOI: 10.23951/1609-624X-2022-5-47-57
Introduction. Due to the fact that the modern world is changing almost at lightning speed, many researchers, comparing the competencies formed in educational institutions and necessary later in practice, seeing the gap between them growing, try to predict in advance the “professions” and the corresponding “competencies of the future”. The list of competencies is being modified, refined and supplemented constantly. For the formation and development of competencies, it is possible to adapt the educational process to the needs and requests of each student by improving the existing information system for supporting the educational process. The aim is to identify the features of the information system for supporting the educational process university, aimed at forming students’ competencies of the future. Material and methods. To solve the tasks set, the following research methods were used. studies: theoretical (study and analysis of literature, comparative analysis of existing E-Learning systems (Moodle, WebTutor, Sakai, IBM, Competentum, Prometheus, Mirapolis), modeling, generalization definition and concretization); empirical (observation, questioning, testing, analysis of products of educational student activities); mathematical methods for processing the results of experimental work. The study was conducted in the 2019–2021 academic year at the Tyumen State University. Students from the Institute of Social Sciences and Humanities took part in the experimental work, Institute of State and Law, Institute of Psychology and Pedagogy, students studying in individual evocative trajectories. Results and discussion. The result of the work was the definition of the basic requirements for the information system for the support of the educational process: the possibility of studying disciplines at several levels of development, which is essential for the implementation of the concept of individual educational technologies; filling the system with holistic educational content that takes into account interdisciplinary connections and the logical sequence of the presentation of the material, its practical orientation; a wide range of mechanisms (indicators) that determine the quality of learning of educational material and the dynamics of the formation of competencies, based on the impulse (clip, fragmented) transfer of knowledge; the presence of constant, maximally informative feedback that allows the teacher to respond promptly to the process and results of students’ work by changing the ways of presenting the material and its content; possibility of communication between all participants of the educational process; increasing motivation and involvement of students by providing a comprehensive mechanism of immersion in the educational process using elements of gamification, activation of reflexive processes, social interaction, intersection with “live practice”. Conclusion. The work carried out made it possible to identify some ways of developing the capacity of existing information systems for supporting the educational process of the university to build individual educational trajectories of students and the formation of “competencies of the future”.
Keywords: information support system, digital educational technologies, education of the future, competencies of the future, individual educational trajectories, modeling, E-Learning, human capital
References:
1. Atlas novykh professiy [Atlas of new professions]. Skolkovo. Moscow, 2014 (in Russian). URL: http://www.skolkovo.ru/public/media/documents/research/sedec/SKOLKOVO_SEDeC_Atlas.pdf (accessed 6 July 2021).
2. World Economic Forum. System Initiatives. URL: https://www.weforum.org/ (accessed 6 July 2021).
3. Martynova M. D. Sovremennye trebovaniya k modeli kompetentsiy vypusknikov vuzov: Soft skills – psikhologo-pedagogicheskiye osnovaniya i tsennostnyi potentsial [Modern requirements for the model of competencies of university graduates: Soft skills – psychological and pedagogical foundations and value potential]. Primo aspectu, 2019, no. 4(36), pp. 107–112 (in Russian). URL: http://www.vstu.ru/uploadiblok/files/primo-aspectu/primo_aspectu_no_4%20(35)%20-%202018.pdf (accessed 6 July 2021).
4. Gizatullina A. V., Shatunova O. V. Nadprofessional’nyye navyki uchiteley: soderzhaniye i vostrebovannost’ [Non-professional skills of teachers: content and relevance]. Vyssheye obrazovaniye segodnya – Higher education today, 2019, no. 5, pp. 14–21 (in Russian). DOI: 10.25586/RNU.HET.19.05.P.14
5. Shilova S. A. Ispol’zovaniye interaktivnykh tekhnologiy dlya formirovaniya kompetentsii komandnoy raboty v usloviyakh prepodavaniya inostrannogo yazyka v vysshey shkole [The use of interactive technologies to form the competence of teamwork in terms of teaching a foreign language in higher education]. Izvestiya Saratovskogo universiteta. Novaya seriya. Seriya: Psikhologiya. Filosofiya. Pedagogika – Izvestiya of Saratov University. Philosophy. Psychology. Pedagogy, 2018, vol. 18, no. 1, pp. 106–110 (in Russian). DOI: https://doi.org/10.18500/1819-7671-2018-18-1-106-110
6. Arkhipova T. G. Kompetentnostniy podkhod k podgotovke sovremennogo spetsialista gosudarstvennoy i munitsipal’noy sluzhby v usloviyakh tsifrovoy ekonomiki [Competence-based approach to the preparation of a modern specialist of state and municipal service in the digital economy]. Primo aspectu, 2019, no. 4(36), pp. 107–112 (in Russian). URL: http://www.vstu.ru/uploadiblok/files/primo-aspectu/primo_aspectu_no_4%20(35)%20-%202018.pdf (accessed 6 July 2021).
7. Chekalina T. A. Sozdaniye elektronnykh obrazovatel’nykh resursov v professional’nykh obrazovatel’nykh organizatsiyakh [Creation of electronic educational resources in professional educational organizations]. Professional’noye obrazovaniye v Rossii i za rubezhom – Professional Education in Russia and Abroad, 2014, no. 3(15), pp. 66–69 (in Russian). URL: http://www.prof-obr42.ru/Archives/3(15)2014.pdf (accessed 6 July 2021).
8. Butko E. Y. Informatsionnaya podderzhka obrazovatel’nykh tekhnologiy [Informational support of educational technologies]. Perspektivy nauki i obrazovaniya – Perspectives of Science and Education, 2017, no. 4 (28) (in Russian). URL: https://pnojournal.files.wordpress.com/2017/07/pdf_170410.pdf (accessed 6 July 2021).
9. Belyakova E. G., Zakharova I. G. Vzaimodeystviye studentov vuza s obrazovatel’nym kontentom v usloviyakh informatsionnoy obrazovatel’noy sredy [The interaction of university students with educational content in an information educational environment]. Obrazovanie i nauka – Education and Science, 2019, vol. 21, no. 3, pp. 77–105 (in Russian). DOI: https://doi.org/10.17853/1994-5639-2019-3-77-105 (accessed 6 July 2021).
10. Ksenofontova A. N., Ledeneva A. V. Kontseptsiya proektirovaniya personal’noy obrazovatel’noy sredy [The concept of designing a personal educational environment]. Vestnik Orenbergskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta – Bulletin of the Orenburg State University, 2016, no. 8 (196), pp. 27–32 (in Russian). URL: http://vestnik.osu.ru/2016_8/5.pdf (accessed 6 July 2021).
11. Beloglazov A. A., Beloglazova L. B. Ispol’zovaniye massovykh otkrytykh onlayn-kursov kak sposob povysheniya kachestva prepodavaniya v sfere informatsionnykh tekhnologiy [Using massive open online courses as a way to improve the quality of teaching in the field of information technology]. Vestnik Rossiiskogo universiteta druzhby narodov. Seriya: Informatizatsiya obrazovaniya – RUDN Journal of Informatization in Education, 2018, no. 15 (2), pp. 206–214 (in Russian). URL: http://journals.rudn.ru/informatization-education/article/view/19152 (accessed 6 July 2021).
12. Yanxia Pang, Yuanyuan Jin, Wenyan Liu, Hongwei Peng, Tian Xia, Yonghe Wu. Adaptive recommendation for MOOC with collaborative filtering and time series. Computer Applications in Engineering Education, 2018, no. 26(6), pp. 2071–2083 (In Eng.) DOI: 10.1002 / cae.21995
13. Kondratenko A. B., Kondratenko B. A. Obosnovaniya personalizatsii obucheniya studentov v informatsionnom obshchestve [Justification for personalizing student learning in the information society]. Vestnik Baltiyskogo federalnogo universiteta im. I. Kanta. Seriya: Filologiya, pedagogika, psikhologiya – IKBFU’s Vestnik. Philology, pedagogy and psychology, 2016, no.3, pp. 83–89 (in Russian). URL: https://journals.kantiana.ru/vestnik/3328/9429/ (accessed 6 july 2021).
14. Korp H., Sjoberg L. Individual Development Plans in the Swedish Comprehensive School: Supporting High Quality Learning and Equity, or Rote Learning and Social Reproduction? Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 2019, vol. 63, no. 2, pp. 229–244. DOI: https://doi.org/full/10.1080/00313831.2017.1336478
15. Kontseotsiya razvituya nepreryvnogo obrazovaniya vzroslykh v RF [The concept of development of continuous adult education in the Russian Federation]. Soyuz DPO. Moscow, 2015 (in Russian). URL:http://www.dpo-edu.ru/?page_id=13095 (accessed 6 July 2021).
16. Strategiya razvitiya molodezhi RF na period do 2025 goda [Youth Development Strategy of the Russian Federation for the period up to 2025] (in Russian). URL: https://fadm.gov.ru/mediafiles/documents/document/98/ae/98aeadb5-7771-4e5b-a8ee-6e732c5d5e84.pdf (accessed 6 July 2021).
17. Zhdanov E. R., Barinova N. A., Magsumov I. R., Yafizova R. A. Postroeniye individual’nykh obrazovatel’nykh trayektoriy obucheniya studentov na osnove SMART-tekhnologiy v usloviyakh modernizatsii obrazovaniya [Construction of individual educational trajectories for students based on SMART-technologies in the context of the modernization of education]. Kazansky pedagogichesky zhurnal – Kazan Pedagogical Journal, 2015, no. 3, pp. 34–39 (in Russian). URL: http://kp-journal.ru/wp-content/uploads/2017/02/3_2015.pdf (accessed 6 July 2021).
18. Weinstein Y. V., Esin R. V. Personalizatsiya obrazovatel’nogo protsessa v obrazovatel’noy srede [Personalization of the educational process in the electronic environment]. Electronnoye obucheniye v neprerivnom obrazovanii – E-learning in continuing education, 2017, no. 1, pp. 54–59 (in Russian). URL: https:// https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=29120644 (accessed 6 July 2021).
19. Zeer E. F., Zhurlova E. Y. Navigatsionniye sredstva kak instrumenty soprovazhdeniya osvoeniya kompetentsiy v usloviyakh realizatsii individual’noy obrazovatel’noy traektorii [Navigation tools as tools to support the development of competencies in the implementation of individual educational trajectory]. Obrazovanie i nauka – Education and Science, 2017, no. 3, pp. 77–93 (in Russian). URL: https://doi.org/10.17853/1994-5639-2017-3-77-93 (accessed 6 July 2021).
20. Noskova T. N., Pavlova T. B., Yakovleva O. V. IKT-instrumenty professional’noy deyatel’nosny pedagoga: sravnitel’nyy analiz rossiyskogo i evropeyskogo opyta [ICT Tools of Professional Teacher Activity: A Comparative Analysis of Russian and European Experience]. Integraciya obrazovaniya – Integration of education, 2018, vol. 22, no. 1, pp. 25–45 (in Russian). URL: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/ikt-instrumenty-professionalnoy-deyatelnosti-pedagoga-sravnitelnyy-analiz-rossiyskogo-i-evropeyskogo-opyta/viewer (accessed 6 July 2021).
21. Mandic D., Jauševac G., Jotanović G., Bešić C., Vilotijević N., Ješić D. Educational Innovations in the Function of Improving Students’ ICT Competences. Croatian Journal of Education: Hrvatski časopis za odgoj i obrazovanje, 2017, vol. 19, no. 3, pp. 61–74. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15516/cje.v19i0.2739
22. Norqvist L., Leffler E. Learning in non-formal education: Is it “youthful” for youth in action? International Review of Education, 2017, vol. 63, no. 2, pp. 235–256. DOI: 10.1007/s11159–017–9631–8Fjgvk
23. Tang S. Y. F., Wong A. K. Y., Li D. D. Y., Cheng M. M. H. The contribution of non-formal learning in higher education to student teachers’ professional competence. Journal of Education for Teaching, 2017, vol. 43, no. 5, pp. 550–565. DOI: 10.1080/02607476.2017.1342052
24. Dabbagh N., Kitsantas A. Personal Learning Environments, social media, and self-regulated learning: A natural formula for connecting formal and informal learning. The Internet and higher education, 2012, vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 3–8. DOI: 10.1016/j.iheduc.2011.06.002
25. Chetvertnova V. V. Problemy motivatsii studentov v vysshey shkole [Problems of motivation of students in higher education]. Universum: Psikhologiya i obrazovaniye: electrony nauchny zhurnal – Universum: psychology and education: electronic scientific journal, 2018, vol. 5, no. 47 (in Russian). URL: http://7universum.com/ru/psy/archive/item/5860 (accessed 6 July 2021).
26. Gordeyeva T. O., Sychev O. A. Motivatsionnyye profili kak prediktory samoregulyatsii i akademicheskoy uspeshnosti studentov [Motivational profiles as predictors of student self-regulation and academic success]. Vestnik Moskovskogo universyteta. Seriya 14. Psikhologiya – Bulletin of Moscow University. Series 14. Psychology, 2017, no. 1, pp. 67–87 (in Russian). URL: http://msupsyj.ru/pdf/vestnik_2017_1/vestnik_2017-1_5.pdf (accessed 6 July 2021).
27. Esin R. V., Weinstein Y. V. Geymifikatsiya v elektronnoy srede kak sredstvo vovlecheniya studentov v obrazovatel’nyy protsess [Electronic gamification as a means of engaging students in the educational process]. Otkrytoye i distantsionnoye obrazovaniye – Open and distance education, 2017, no. 2 (66), pp. 26–32 (in Russian). DOI: 10.17223/16095944/66/3
28. Dubrovsky V. V., Klimov V. I. Vyyavleniye i analiz urovnya sformirovannosti poznavatel’noy motivatsii studentov vuza sredstvami igrovykh tekhnologiy [Identification and analysis of the level of development of the cognitive motivation of university students by means of gaming technology]. Alma mater (Vestnik vysshey shkoly) – Alma mater Herald of Higher Education, 2019, no. 7, pp. 102–106 (in Russian). DOI: 10.20339/AM.07-19.102
29. Welber K., Elly A Konijn, Burgers C., Anna Bij de Vaate, Eden A, Britta C Brugman. Gamification as a tool for engaging student learning: A field experiment with a gamified app. E-learning and Digital Media, 2019, vol. 16, no. 2, pp. 92–109. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/2042753018818342
30. Lee Joey J., Hammer J. Gamification in Education: What, How, Why Bother? Academic Exchange Quarterly, 2011, vol. 15, no. 2, pp. 146–150. DOI: https://www.academia.edu/570970/Gamification_in_Education_What_How_Why_Bother
31. Varenina L. P. Geymifikatsiya v obrazovanii [Gamification in education]. Istoricheskaya i sochialno-obrazovatelnaya misl’ – Historical and Social-Educational Idea, 2014, vol. 6, no. 6-2(28), pp. 314–317 (in Russian). URL: http://journals.tsu.ru/ou/&journal_page=archive&id=1121&article_id=18000 (accessed 6 July 2021).
32. Elagina O. B., Pisklakov P. V. Geymifikatsiya distantsionnogo obucheniya [Gamification distance learning]. Otkritoye i distantsionnoye obrazovaniye – Open and distance education, 2014, no. (4-56), pp. 22–28 (in Russian). URL: http://journals.tsu.ru/ou/&journal_page=archive&id=1121&article_id=18000 (accessed 6 July 2021).
( 1012.44 kB ) 
( 995.72 kB )
Issue: 5, 2022
Series of issue: Issue 5
Rubric: HIGHER EDUCATION
Pages: 47 — 57
Downloads: 422