POSSIBILITIES OF FRAME ANALYSIS WHEN SIMULATING THE SENSE SPACE OF A TALK-SHOW (ON THE MATERIAL OF ANNOTATIONS TO TELEVISION SHOW “ANDREY MALAKHOV. PRYAMOY EFIR”)
DOI: 10.23951/1609-624X-2022-3-15-22
Introduction. Talk-shows are a popular genre of modern television, which leads to an interest in their study. A tough scenario with distributed roles of participants, the conflicting nature of communication between them form a semantic space in which conflicting norms, values, and assessments collide. The framing of interpersonal relations, broadcast in the programs, allows you to reconstruct the model of the world that this genre is broadcasting. Aim and objectives – modeling of frames reflecting the semantic space of programs “Andrey Malakhov. Pryamoy efir”. Material and methods. The article examines the titles and annotations of episodes of one of the entertaining talk shows on Russian television “Andrey Malakhov. Pryamoy efir” for the first half of 2018. The texts were taken from the official website of the Russia 1 channel. The volume of the material under study is 110 annotations with titles. In relation to the original video recordings, annotations are interpretive type secondary texts. Introspection, content analysis of frequency speech units, contextual analysis of all speech words are used as methods preceding framing. Thus, the procedure for allocating frames is based on qualitative and quantitative analysis methods. Results and discussion. Frames selected from the annotation texts of the talk show “Andrey Malakhov. Pryamoy efir”, consist of four slots: “subject X” – the main character of the program, “object Y” – his opponent (in some frames it is deactivated), “predicate RD” – the dominant speech action, “subject P” – discussed in the program situations. One of the common frames “X blames Y-a for P” is contained in the annotations for the 22nd programs. X and / or Y are usually public figures or persons associated with them. The subject and the object are expressed by identifying proper names, nominations for belonging to a social group, terms of legal discourse, characterizing lexemes. The negatively colored characteristics of X-am and Y-am are given from the side of the carriers of the opposite point of view. In most of the designations of the participants in the program, conflicts are initially laid down. The predicate of speech action is the verb “accuse”. As part of the annotations, the accusation is expressed explicitly (“accused”), either in neutral speech words that introduce defamatory information (she said that...), or lexemes denoting the negative emotional state of the accuser (outraged). The basis for the accusation, “Situation P”, is usually expressed explicitly, directly related to the topics of the programs; explicit nominations alternate with those where an indication of the reason for the accusation is contained in the presupposive component of the statement. Conclusion. By framing annotations, it is shown how the semantic space of the talk show “Andrey Malakhov. Pryamoy efir” is arranged. Based on the comparison of texts, identification of their similarities and differences in different parameters, eight global speech actions used in the format of this program were identified. One of the most frequent speech actions is accusation. Modeling the frame “X blames Y-a for P” made it possible to determine the typical participants in communication, typical life situations, to generalize this information within the boundaries of the slots. It is obvious that the predicate “speech act of accusation” is of a conflicting nature. The filling of the slots “subject X”, “object Y”, “situation P – grounds for accusation” confirmed the conflicting charge of the talk show’s semantic space. The same appraisal nomination within the program can be ambivalent – correlated with the accuser and the accused, which “dilutes” the position of the talk show creators. Along with evaluative ambivalence, the publicity of the participants and their placement in the field of legal discourse increase the degree of conflict of the considered television genre.
Keywords: TV discourse, talk-show, “Andrey Malakhov. Pryamoy efir”, annotations, frame, conflict, accusation
References:
1. Khakhalova S. A. Spetsifika vzaimosvyazi pertseptov, reprezentatsiy, freymov i kontseptov v mental’noy modeli mira [The specificity of the relationship of perceptions, representations, frames and concepts in the mental model of the world]. Filologicheskiye nauki. Voprosy teorii i praktiki – Philology. Theory and Practice, 2021, no. 4, pp. 1276–1282 (in Russian).
2. Sibidanov B. B. Dve formy otritsaniya v televizionnom tresh-diskurse [Two forms of denial in television trash discourse]. Uchenyye zapiski Novgorodskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta imeni Yaroslava Mudrogo – Memoirs of NovSU, 2019, no. 1 (19), pp. 1–7 (in Russian).
3. Karasik V. I. Normy povedeniya v yazykovoy kartine mira [The norms of behavior in the linguistic picture of the world]. Vestnik Moskovskogo gosudarstvennogo oblastnogo universiteta. Seriya: Lingvistika – Bulletin of the Moscow Region State University. Series: Linguistics, 2019, no. 4, pp. 35–49 (in Russian).
4. Shcherbakov S. V. Konfliktnyye situatsii i freymy [Conflict situations and frames]. Vestnik nauki i obrazovaniya, 2019, no. 20 (74), part 1, pp. 89–91 (in Russian).
5. Matytsina M. S. Perspektivy integratsii kriticheskogo diskurs-analiza v empiricheskiy instrumentariy issledovaniya politicheskikh yavleniy [Prospects for the integration of critical discourse analysis into the empirical research toolkit for political phenomena]. Litera, 2019, no. 2, pp. 175–182 (in Russian).
6. Vel’misova D. V. Issledovaniye konflikta kak protsessa interpretatsii i generirovaniya smyslov [Study of conflict as a process of interpretation and generation of meanings]. Teleskop: zhurnal sotsiologicheskikh i marketingovykh issledovaniy – Telescope: journal of sociological and marketing research, 2021, no. 2, pp. 14–23 (in Russian).
7. Bushuyeva L. A. Lingvokognitivnoye modelirovaniye postupkov: evristicheskiy potentsial teorii freymov i teorii prototipov [Linguo-cognitive modeling of actions: the heuristic potential of frame theory and prototype theory]. Vestnik Voronezhskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriya: Lingvistika i mezhkulturnaya kommunikatsiya – Proceedings of Voronezh State University. Series: Linguistics and intercultural communication, 2019, no. 2, pp. 10–19 (in Russian).
8. Smotrim: rossiyskaya mul’timediynaya onlayn-platforma [Smotrim: Russian multimedia online platform] (in Russian). URL: http://smotrim.ru (accessed 1 December 2021).
9. Gulenko P. V., Dolgova Yu. I. Problemy klassifikatsii sovremennykh teleperedach: sushchnostnyye kharakteristiki formata “Tokshou” [Classification problems of modern television programs: the essential characteristics of the “talk-show” format]. Vestnik Rossiyskogo universiteta druzhby narodov. Seriya: Literaturovedeniye, zhurnalistika – RUDN Journal of Studies in Literature and Journalism, 2016, no. 3, pp. 102–110 (in Russian).
10. Magomedova P. M., Lekova P. A. Rechevyye strategii televedushchego tok-shou (na materiale teleperedachi “Davay pozhenimsya”) [Speech strategies of the TV host of the talk show (based on the material of the TV show “Davay pozhenimsya”]. Izvestiya Dagestanskogo gosudarstvennogo pedagogicheskogo universiteta. Obshchestvennyye i gumanitarnyye nauki, 2018, vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 70–75 (in Russian).
11. Morozov E. A. Freym-analiz v upravlenii publichnymi konfliktami [Frame analysis in the management of public conflicts]. Aktualnyye problemy gumanitarnykh i estestvennykh nauk, 2009, no. 10, pp. 1–13 (in Russian).
12. Bol’shoy tolkovyy slovar’ russkogo yazyka. Glavnyy redaktor S. A. Kuznetsov [Great Dictionary of Russian language. Chief Editor S. A. Kuznetsov] (in Russian). URL: http://www.gramota.ru/slovari/info/bts (accessed 1 December 2021).
13. Orlova N. V. Zhanry razgovornoy rechi i ikh “stilisticheskaya obrabotka”: K voprosu o sootnoshenii stilya i zhanra [Genres of colloquial speech and their “stylistic processing”: On the question of the relationship between style and genre]. Zhanry rechi, 1997, no. 1, pp. 51–55 (in Russian).
14. Ustinova T. V. Konstruirovaniye znacheniya v usloviyakh namerennoy rechevoy neodnoznachnosti [Meaning construction in the context of intentional speech ambiguity]. Filologicheskiye nauki. Voprosy teorii i praktiki – Philology. Theory and Practice, 2019, vol. 2, no. 10, pp. 275–278 (in Russian).
15. Fedyayeva N. D. Semantika normy v russkom yazyke: funktsional’nyy, kategorial’nyy, lingvokul’turologicheskiy aspekty. Avtoref. dis. dokt. filol. nauk [Semantics of the norm in Russian: functional, categorical, linguocultural aspects. Abstract of thesis cand. philol. sci.]. Barnaul, 2010. 40 p. (in Russian).
( 781.74 kB ) 
( 768.67 kB )
Issue: 3, 2022
Series of issue: Issue 3
Rubric: THEORETICAL AND APPLIED LINGUISTICS
Pages: 15 — 22
Downloads: 421