MENTORING THE GIFTED: EDUCATIONAL AND PSYCHOLOGICAL PERSPECTIVES
DOI: 10.23951/1609-624X-2022-2-39-49
Introduction. Gifted people, especially children and adolescents, need individualized learner-centered methods of education, support and guidance. This article addresses the potential of mentoring in gifted education. The purpose of the research is to analyze theoretical and methodological perspectives of giftedness and specify the role of mentoring in the development of gifted individuals. Materials and methods. The author reviews and conducts a theoretical analysis of Russian and international scholarly literature on giftedness and mentoring; outlines Russian and international practices of mentoring the gifted; describes the main characteristic features of gifted individuals; summarizes the obtained data. Results and discussion. The author considers giftedness as a complex system and describes its main components which determine successful or problem development of gifted children and adolescents. Consequently, gifted children and adolescents need more individualized interventions and informal relationships. The article reviews retrospectively the most prominent international research investigations which revealed positive correlations between the experience of mentoring relationships and success and high achievements of their participants. Formal programmes of mentoring are designed in order to achieve positive outcomes of informal mentoring relationships. The majority of such programmes follow theoretical models of giftedness. The author describes R. Subotnik’s Talent-Development Mega- Model and clarifies the stages of domain trajectories when mentoring is mostly required. Conclusion. The author summarizes theoretical and methodological perspectives of giftedness. They include the following: 1. giftedness is a complex system of personal attributes and qualities which determine a possibility of high achievements in one or more domains and is considered as a result of whole personal development of the gifted individual; 2. gifted people have special needs for individualized support, guidance and special attention within an enriched facilitating learning environment which are determined by the heterogeneous nature of this group of learners; 3. essential characteristics of mentoring make it an appropriate method for meeting educational needs of gifted and talented learners. The role of mentoring in the development of gifted individuals is specified.
Keywords: mentoring, giftedness, mentoring the gifted, a generalized portrait of the gifted child, development of gifted individuals, support, guidance, mentoring programmes for the gifted
References:
1. Bogoyavlenskaya D. B. O ponyatii “odarennost’” [On the concept of “Giftedness”]. Obrazobvaniye lichnosti – Personality formation, 2020, no. 3–4, pp. 52–61 (in Russian).
2. Brushlinskiy A. V. Problemy psikhologii sub’’yekta [Problems of subject’s psychology]. Moscow, Institute of psychology RAS Publ., 1994. 109 p. (in Russian).
3. Druzhinin V. N. Psikhologiya obshchikh sposobnostey [Psychology of general abilities]. Moscow, Yurayt Publ., 2020. 150 p. (in Russian).
4. Matyushkin A. M. Kontseptsiya tvorcheskoy odarennosti [The concept of creative giftedness]. Vestnik prakticheskoy psikhologii obrazovaniya – Bulletin of Practical Psychology of Education, 2021, no. 4, pp. 83–85 (in Russian).
5. Savenkov A. I. Detskaya odarennist’ kak problema sovremennogo obrazovaniya [Children’s giftedness as a problem of contemporary education]. Psikhologiya odarennisti i tvorchestva [Psychology of giftedness and creativity]. Moscow, Izvestiya instituta pedagogiki i psikhologii Publ., 2019. P. 57–63 (in Russian).
6. Teplov B. M. Problemy individual’nykh razlichiy [Problems of individual differences]. Moscow, Izdatel’stvo Akademii pedagogicheskilh nauk Publ., 1961. 538 p. (in Russian).
7. Ushakov D. V. Psikhologiya intellekta i odarennosti [Psychology of intelligence and giftedness]. Moscow, Institute of Psychology RAS Publ., 2011. 464 p. (in Russian).
8. Kholodnaya M. A. Mnogomernaya priroda pokazateley intellekta i kreativnosti: metodicheskiye i teoreticheskiye sledstviya [Multidimensional nature of intelligence and creativity indicators: methodical and theoretical consequences]. Psikhologicheskiy zhurnal – Psychological Journal, 2020, vol. 41, no. 3, pp. 18–31. DOI: 10.31857/S020595920009342-2 (in Russian).
9. Shadrikov V. D. Psykhologicheskaya teoriya sposobnostey i odarennosti [Psychological theory of abilities and giftedness]. Sbornik statey Vserossiyskoy nauchno-prakticheskoy konferentsii s mezhdunarodnym uchastiyem: v 3 chastyakh. Moskva, 15–17 noyabrya 2021 goda [Proceedings of All-Russian research conference with international participation. In 3 parts. Ed. D. B. Bogoyavlenskaya]. Ed. D. B. Bogoyavlenskaya. Moscow, Association of technical universities Publ., 2021. P. 35–39. DOI: 10.53677/9785919160441_35_39 (in Russian).
10. Yurkevich V. S. Odarennyye deti i intellektual’no-tvorcheskiy potentsial obshchestva [Gifted children and intellectual creative potential of society]. Psikhologicheskaya nauka i obrazovaniye – Psychological science and education, 2009, no. 4, pp. 74–86 (in Russian).
11. Yurkevich V. S. Intellektual’naya odarennost’ i sotsial’noye razvitiye: protivoretchivaya svyaz’ [Intellectual giftedness and social development: an analysis of the contradictory context]. Sovremennaya zarubezhnaya psikhologiya – Journal of Modern Foreign Psychology, 2018, vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 28–38 (in Russian). DOI: 10.17759/jmfp.2018070203.
12. Clasen D. R., Clasen R. E. Mentoring: A time-honored option for education of the gifted and talented. In: Handbook of gifted education. N. Colangelo, G. A. Davis (Eds.). Needham Heights, MA: Allyn and Bacon, 1997. P. 218–229.
13. Freeman J. Mentoring gifted pupils. Educating Able Children, 2001, vol. 5, pp. 2–12.
14. Freeman J. Permission to be gifted. In: Conceptions of giftedness, second edition. R. J. Sternberg, J. E. Davidson (Eds.). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press, 2005. P. 80–97.
15. Kaufman F. A., Harrel G., Milam C. P., Woolverton N., Miller L. B. The nature role and influence of mentors in the lives of gifted adults. Journal of Counselling and Development, 1986, vol. 64, pp. 576–578.
16. Kaufmann F. A., Matthews D. J. On Becoming Themselves: The 1964–1968 Presidential Scholars 40 Years Later. Roeper Review, 2012, vol. 34 (2), pp. 83–93.
17. Subotnik R. F. Talent developed – Conversations with masters in the Arts and Sciences. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 2002, vol. 25, pp. 290–302.
18. Subotnik R. F., Olszewski-Kubilius P., Worrell F. C. Rethinking giftedness and gifted education. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 2011, vol. 12, pp. 3–54. DOI: 10.1177/1529100611418056
19. Torrance E. P. Growing up creatively gifted: A 22-year longitudinal study. Creative Child and Adult Quarterly, 1980, vol. 5 (1), pp. 148–158.
20. Zorman R., Rachmel Sh., Bashan Z. The national mentoring program in Israel. Challenges and achievement. Gifted education international, 2016, vol. 32 (2), pp. 173–184.
21. Zorman R. The life-stage mentoring model for the gifted. Gifted International, 1993, vol. 8 (1), pp. 4–8.
22. Gagné F. From gifts to talents: The DMGT as a developmental model. In: Conceptions of giftedness, second edition. R. J. Sternberg, J. E. Davidson (Eds.). N. Y.: Cambridge University Press, 2005. P. 98–119.
23. Guilford J. P. The Nature of Human Intelligence. N. Y.: McGraw-Hill Education. 1967. 538 p.
24. Il’in Ye. P. Psikhologiya tvorchestva, kreativnosti, odarennosti [Psychology of creativity and giftedness]. Saint Petersburg, Piter Publ., 2009. 444 p. (in Russian).
25. Renzulli J. S. The three-ring conception of giftedness. A developmental model for promoting creative productivity. In: Conceptions of giftedness. R. J. Sternberg, J. E. Davidson (Eds.). N. Y.: Cambridge University Press, 2005. P. 246–279.
26. Tannenbaum A. J. Gifted children: Psychological and educational perspectives. N. Y.: Macmillan, 1983. 552 p.
27. Grigorenko E. L. Approaches to the Identification and Development of Gifts into Talents in Russia. In: Conceptions of Giftedness and Talent. Cham: Springer-Verlag GmbH. 2021. P. 163–180. DOI: 10.1007%2F978-3-030-56869-6_10
28. Batyshev S. Ya. Osnovy pedagogicheskoy deyatel’nosti nastavnika [Foundations of mentor’s educational activity]. Moscow, Znaniye Publ., 1977. 63 p. (in Russian).
29. Anderson E. M., Shannon A. L. Towards a conceptualization of mentoring. Journal of Teacher Education, 1988, vol. 39, no. 1, pp. 38–42. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/002248718803900109
30. Clutterbuck D. Everyone Needs a Mentor: Fostering Talent at Work (3rd edn.). London: Chartered Institute of Personnel and Development, 2001. 158 p.
31. Kram K. E. Phases of the mentor relationship. Academy of Management Journal, 1983, vol. 26, pp. 608–625.
32. Gardner H. Frames of mind: The theory of multiple intelligences. N. Y.: Basic Books, 1983. 529 p.
33. Kaufman J. C., Beghetto, R. A. Beyond big and little: The four c model of creativity. Review of General Psychology, 2009, vol. 13, pp. 1–12. DOI: 10.1037/a0013688
34. Simonton D. K. Creativity: Cognitive, personal, developmental, and social aspects. American Psychologist, 2000, vol. 55, pp. 151–157. DOI: 10.1037/0003-066X.55.1.151
35. Betts G., Neihart M. Profiles of the gifted and talented. Gifted Child Quarterly, 1988, vol. 32(2), pp. 248–253.
36. Guthrie K. H. The Weight of Expectations: A Thematic Narrative of Gifted Adolescent Girls’ Reflections of Being Gifted. Roeper Review, 2020, vol. 42, no. 1, pp. 25–37. DOI: 10.1080/02783193.2019.1690080
37. Szymanski A., Wrenn M. Growing up with intensity: Reflections on the lived experiences of intense, gifted adults. Roeper Review, 2019, vol. 41, no. 4, pp. 243–257. DOI: 10.1080/02783193.2019.1661054
38. Adderholdt-Ellliot M. Perfectionism and underachievement. Gifted Child Today, 1989, vol. 12 (1), pp. 19–21.
39. Dudina E. A. Realizatsiya programm nastavnichestva odarennykh shkol’nikov v zarubezhnykh stranakh [Implementation of mentoring programs for gifted and talented children and youth (an international perspective)]. Vestnik Novosibirskogo gosudarstvennogo pedagogicheskogo universiteta, 2018, vol. 8, no. 6, pp. 41–57 (in Russian).
40. Brown M., Peterson E. R., Rawlinson C. Research with gifted adults: What international experts think needs to happen to move the field forward. Roeper Review, 2020, vol. 42, no. 2, pp. 95–108. DOI: 10.1080/02783193.2020.1728797
41. Bloom B. J. (Ed.) Developing talent in young people. N. Y.: Ballantine Books. 1985. 600 p.
42. Dudina E. A. Nastavnichestvo kak osobyy vid pedagogicheskoy deyatel’nosty: sushchnostnyye kharakteristiki i struktura [Mentoring as an educational activity: essential characteristics and structure]. Vestnik Novosibirskogo gosudarstvennogo pedagogicheskogo universiteta, 2017, vol. 7, no. 5, pp. 25–36. DOI: 10.15293/2226-3365.1705.02 (in Russian).
( 808.75 kB ) 
( 793.64 kB )
Issue: 2, 2022
Series of issue: Issue 2
Rubric: GENERAL EDUCATION
Pages: 39 — 49
Downloads: 715