FUNCTIONING OF MANIPULATIVE ARGUMENTS IN JUDICIAL SPEECH (BASED ON THE MATERIAL OF THE PROSECUTOR’S SPEECHES IN THE DEBATE)
DOI: 10.23951/1609-624X-2021-6-105-111
Introduction. The article considers the role of sophisms in the judicial speech of one of the Tomsk prosecutors. The significance of the research is determined by the combination of the problems of the effectiveness of modern judicial speech, the designation of its place in the structure of the judicial process with linguistic and phonological categories. The purpose is to assess the relevance of the use of sophisms in the speech practice of the modern Tomsk prosecutor. The object of the analysis is the speech activity of a linguistic personality-the prosecutor of Tomsk, a woman, 38 years old. Material and methods. The following methods were used: observation, scientific description, discursive analysis. The material was oral recordings of speeches of the Tomsk prosecutor, lawyer and the defendant, made during one trial. The volume of the material is about 11.5 words. Results and discussion. The article describes various types of sophisms noted in the speeches of the prosecutor: substitution of the thesis, false arguments, arbitrary arguments, arguments against a person, etc. It is found that rhetorical arguments prevail over logical arguments in the speech in the debate. Actually, manipulative techniques are concentrated in that part of the judicial controversy, which is called a replica. To confirm this postulate, the main theses were highlighted, which were proved and evaluated during the debate. Variants of speculative use of evaluative rhetorical techniques prevail. Less common are “false analogy” and “female logic”. There are few cases of distortion of the thesis: “narrowing-expansion of the thesis”, “substitution of the thesis”. At this stage, it is difficult to assess whether the commitment to manipulative techniques is an individual feature of the speaker, or it is typical for a modern judicial process. The use of sophisms is part of the traditions of modern judicial practice, which began in the nineteenth century. It is noted that in the case of using manipulative arguments, the feature of the speaker’s speech portrait is most clearly manifested: subjective assessment and emotionality. Conclusion. We can say that the chosen strategy, assuming the presence of sophisms, proved its situational effectiveness, since it probably became one of the factors that influenced the decision of the court that supported the prosecution. Each speaker, as a professional language personality, has his own arsenal of effective and ineffective ways of organizing a discussion, it is necessary to replenish his communicative arsenal with the most effective management strategies that influenced the court’s decision.
Keywords: judicial rhetoric, sophism, linguistic personality, efficiency
References:
1. Pirinova N. V. Kognitivnaya obuslovlennost’ i stilevoye svoyeobraziye sudebnykh rechey F. N. Plevako. Avtoref. dis. kand. filol. nauk [Cognitive conditionality and the stylistic peculiarity of the judicial speeches of F. N. Plevako. Abstract of thesis cand. philol. sci.]. Taganrog, 2006. 24 p. (in Russian).
2. Baisheva Z. V. Yazykovaya lichnost’ sudebnogo oratora A. F. Koni. Avtoref. dis. dokt. filol. nauk [Language personality of the judicial orator A. F. Koni. Abstract of thesis doct. of philol. sci.]. Ufa, 2007. 47 p. (in Russian).
3. Artyomova T. V. Narrativ kak component ritoricheskoy strategii obvinitel’nykh rechey A. F. Koni. Avtoref. dis. kand. filol. nauk [Narrative as a component of the rhetorical strategy of A. F. Coney’s accusatory speeches. Abstract of thesis of cand. philol. sci.]. Kemerovo, 2008. 23 p. (in Russian).
4. Volkova T. F. Rechevaya deyatel’nost’ sovremennogo sudebnogo oratora (na materiale vystupleniy v preniyakh) [Speech activity of a modern judicial speaker (based on the material of speeches in debates)]. Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta – Tomsk State University Journal, 2019, no. 444, pp. 38–46 (in Russian).
5. Volkova T. F. Teoreticheskiye i prikladnye aspekty izucheniya publichnoy yazykovoy lichnosti [Theoretical and applied aspects of the study of the public language personality]. Filologicheskiye nauki. Voprosy teorii i praktiki – Philology. Theory and Practice, 2008, no.1, pp. 60–63 (inRussian).
6. Gavrilova M. V. Metody i metodiki issledovaniya politicheskoy kommunikatsii: uchebnoye posobiye dlya studentov vuzov [Methods and methods of research of political communication: A textbook for university students]. Saint Peterburg, Nevsky Institute of Language and Culture Publ., 2008. 92 p. (in Russian).
7. Vinogradov V. V. O yazyke khudozhestvennoy prozy. Izbrannye trudy. T. 5 [About the language of literary prose. Selected works. Vol. 5]. Moscow, Nauka Publ., 1980. 360 p. (in Russian).
8. Ivakina N. N. Osnovy sudebnogo krasnorechiya [Foundations of forensic eloquence]. Moscow, Yurist Publ., 2007. 464 p. (in Russian).
9. Oturgasheva N. V. Sudebnaya ritorika: uchebnoye posobiye dlya distantsionnogo obucheniya i samostoyatel’noy raboty studentov [Judicial rhetoric: a textbook for distance learning and independent work of students]. Novosibirsk, SibAGS Publ., 2006. 152 p. (in Russian).
10. Zemlyakova N. V., Garbovskaya N. B. Argumentatsiya v sudebnoy ritorike [The reasoning in the judicial rhetoric]. Teoriya i praktika obshchestvennogo razvitiya – Theory and practice of social development, 2017, no. 6, pp. 101–105 (in Russian).
11. Fedulova M. A. Sudebnaya ritorika kak sostavnaya chast’ oratorskogo iskusstva [Judicial rhetoric as an integral part of oratory]. Vestnik Moskovskogo gosudarstvennogo gumanitarnogo universiteta im. M. A. Sholokhova. Filologicheskiye nauki, 2009, no. 4, pp. 81–85 (in Russian).
12. Sergeich P. Iskusstvo rechi na sude [Art of speech at court]. Moscow, Yurayt Publ., 2016. 395 p. (in Russian).
13. Mel’nikov I. I., Mel’nikov I. I. Sudebnaya rech’: Dlya uchastnikov sudebnykh preniy po ugolovnym delam [Judicial speech: for participants of judicial debate on criminal cases]. Moscow, EKMOS Publ., 2003. 160 p. (in Russian).
14. Volkov A. A. Kurs russkoy ritoriki [The course of Russian rhetoric]. Moscow, Izdatel’stvo khrama svyatoy muchenitsy Tatiany Publ., 2001. 480 p. (in Russian).
15. Anisimova T. V., Gimpel’son E. G. Sovremennaya delovaya ritorika: uchebnoye posobiye [Modern business rhetoric. Training manual]. Moscow, MPSU; Voronezh, MODEK Publ., 2002. 432 p. (in Russian).
16. Volkova T. F., Demidova T. A., Gritsenko L. M. Ritoricheskiy rechevoy portret publichnoy yazykovoy lichnosti: effektivnost’ logicheskoy i psikhologicheskoy storony argumentatsii [Rhetorical speech portrait of public language identity: effectiveness of logical and psychological sides of argumentation]. Politematicheskiy setevoy elektronnyy nauchnyy zhurnal Kubanskogo gosudarstvennogo agrarnogo universiteta (Nauchnyy zhurnal KubGAU) – Polythematic Online Scientific Journal of Kuban State Agrarian University, 2017, no. 132, pp. 592–604 (in Russian).
17. Klimovich O. V. Yazykovaya lichnost’ advokata v kontekste yuridicheskogo diskursa (na material rechey S. A. Andryievskogo i N. P. Karabchevskogo). Avtoref. dis. kand. filol. nauk [Linguistic personality of a lawyer in the context of legal discourse (on the material of speeches S. A. Andrievsky and N. P. Karachevskogo). Abstractof theisis cand. philol. sci.]. Ufa, 2016. 20 p. (in Russian).
18. Kubits G. V. Professionalizatsiya yazykovoy lichnosti (na primere yuridicheskogo diskursa). Avtofer. dis. kand. filol. nauk [The professionalization of language personality (on the example of legal discourse). Abstract of thesis cand. philol. sci.]. Chelyabinsk, 2005. 19 p. (in Russian).
19. Ipatova I. S. Yazykovaya lichnost’ yurista: vchera, segodnya, zavtra [Linguistic personality of a lawyer: yesterday, today, tomorrow]. Gosudarstvo i pravo v izmenyayushchemsya mire: materialy nauchno-prakticheskoy konferentsii. N. Novgorod, 5 marta 2016 [State and law in a changing world: materials of scientific-practical conference. N. Novgorod, on March 5]. Nizhny Novgorod, RGUP Publ., 2016 (in Russian).
( 411.87 kB ) 
( 405.99 kB )
Issue: 6, 2021
Series of issue: Issue 6
Rubric: THEORETICAL, APPLIED AND COMPARATIVE LINGUISTICS
Pages: 105 — 111
Downloads: 529