MATRIX MANAGEMENT AS A WAY TO ORGANIZING TEACHERS’ EFFECTIVE INTERACTION
DOI: 10.23951/1609-624X-2021-2-78-87
Introduction. The purpose of the article is proving the expediency of necessity of a qualitative change in the management system of educational organizations, in particular, the possibility of applying the matrix approach, in order to organize effective interaction in the teaching staff. Material and methods. The research materials were the results of the psychological and pedagogical findings of national and foreign scientists (A. V. Afonina, A. A. Bodalev, Ya. L. Kolominsky, V. A. Malikova, A. Kh. Maslow, A. B. Orlova), and the experimental work, which was carried out by employees and students of Master’s program of the Northern (Arctic) Federal University from 2017 to 2019. These data allowed studying the peculiarities and dynamics of the secondary school teachers’ interaction, due to qualitative changes in the management system. Results and discussion. The main goal of the state educational policy is to improve the quality of education, and the organization of effective interaction in the teaching staff is a progressive means for achieving it. However, the phenomenon of synergetic interaction, possessing the potential for qualitative growth of teams, has not been fully studied in the field of education. Moreover, practice shows that modern teachers prefer the creation of personal educational spaces. There is an extremely low level of teachers’ group and teamwork at school, and the problem of building effective interaction between pedagogues is one of the key. Responsibility for the functioning and development of productive labor relations lies with the administrative stuff, and there is a lot of regulatory methods for organizing effective interaction. Professional educational activity is based on the main principles of harmonious management in any industry. There are four the most important management functions. They are planning, organization, motivation and control. The criteria for effective interaction, according to the research of A. V. Afonina, are mutual cognition, mutual understanding, relationships, mutually defined actions and mutual influence. Using the data of these equal organizational units in the managerial structure on a parity basis (a matrix approach) is an effective way for organizing of teachers’ effective interaction. This idea was proved by the results of the experiment, which had been conducted in one of the Arkhangelsk secondary schools. Conclusion. Matrix-structured management has a positive potential for building and implementing of teachers’ effective interaction. Moreover, in conformity with the educational environment, it is an innovatively oriented organizational management system.
Keywords: interaction, effective interaction, professional pedagogical interaction, effective interaction criteria, educational management, matrix management
References:
1. Rossiyskaya Federatsiya. Gosudarstvennaya programma Rossiyskoy Federatsii «Razvitiye obrazovaniya»: postanovleniye Pravitel’stva Rossiyskoy Federatsii ot 26.12.2017. № 1642 [The Russian Federation. The state program of the Russian Federation “Development of education”: Decree of the Government of the Russian Federation of December 26, 2017 No. 1642] (in Russian).
2. Orsag Yu. V. Printsipy i tekhniki effektivnogo vzaimodeystviya v professional’noy srede [Principles and techniques of effective interaction in a professional environment] (in Russian). URL: https://en.ppt-online.org/264542 (accessed 4 December 2020).
3. Maslou A. Samoaktualizatsiya. Psikhologiya lichnosti [Self-actualization. Psychology of Personality]. Moscow, MGU Publ., 1993. 288 p. (in Russian).
4. Psikhologiya obshcheniya [Psychology of communication]. Moscow, Kogito-Tsentr Publ., 2011. 256 p. (in Russian).
5. Slastenin V. A. Pedagogika [Pedagogy]. Moscow, Akademiya Publ., 2002. 576 p. (in Russian).
6. Standrovskaya E. K. Teoreticheskiye osnovy upravleniya proektami v obrazovatel’noy organizatsii [Theoretical Foundations of Project Management in an Educational Organization]. Kontsept – Koncept, 2016, vol. 2, pp. 186–190 (in Russian).
7. Barabanova Z. P. Organizatsiya obrazovatel’nogo vzaimodeystviya [Organization of educational interaction]. Sovremennye naukoemkiye tekhnologii – Modern high technologies, 2008, no. 1, pp. 40–42 (in Russian).
8. Malikova V. A. Razvitiye professional’nogo vzaimodeystviya psikhologa i pedagoga (Teoriya i praktika obrazovaniya). Dis. dokt. psikhol. nauk [The development of professional interaction of psychologist and teacher (Theory and practice of education). Diss. doct. psychol. sci.]. Moscow, 1999. 331 p. (in Russian).
9. Orlov A. B. Psikhologiya lichnosti i sushchnosti cheloveka: paradigmy, proektsii, praktiki [Psychology of the personality and essence of man: paradigm, projection, practice]. Moscow, Akademiya Publ., 2002. 272 p. (in Russian).
10. Kolominskiy Ya. L. Psikhologiya pedagogicheskogo vzaimodeystviya [Psychology of pedagogical interaction]. Saint Petersburg, Rech’ Publ., 2007. 124 p. (in Russian).
11. Afonina A. V. Deyatel’nostnyy podkhod v kontekste vzaimodeystviya uchastnikov obrazovatel’nogo protsessa [An active approach in the interaction of participants in the educational process]. Teorii i tekhnologii kachestva obrazovaniya v XXI veke: akmeologicheskiye i psikhologo-pedagogicheskiye aspekty. Materialy mezhdunarodnogo simpoziuma [Theories and technologies of education quality in the XXI century: acmeological and psychological-pedagogical aspects. Materials of the international symposium]. Kostroma, 2004. Pp. 11–12 (in Russian).
12. Markova S. M. Modelirovaniye pedagogicheskikh system [Modeling of pedagogical systems]. Nizhniy Novgorod, 2004. 100 p. (in Russian).
13. Atamanchuk G. V. Problemy upravleniya i upravlyayemosti v obshchestve: izbrannoye [Problems of management and manageability in society: favorites]. Moscow, 2011. 382 p. (in Russian).
14. Artyukhov M. V. Upravleniye obrazovatel’nymi sistemami: menedzhment, marketing, chelovecheskiye resursy [Management of educational systems: management, marketing, human resources]. Novokuznetsk, 2004. 269 p. (in Russian).
15. Mazur I. I. Upravleniye proyektami [Project Management]. Moscow, Omega-L Publ., 2004. 664 p. (in Russian).
16. Lukicheva L. L. Upravleniye organizatsiyey [Organization management]. Moscow, Omega-L Publ., 2006. 360 p. (in Russian).
17. Merzlikin A. Yu. Matrichnaya struktura upravleniya kak osnova sistemy innovatsionnogo upravleniya obrazovatel’noy organizatsiyey [Matrix management structure as the basis of the innovative management system of an educational organization]. Molodoy uchenyy, 2016, no. 12, pp. 1355–1359 (in Russian).
18. Bolotin I. S., Sorokin N. D. Problemy kachestva obrazovaniya v usloviyakh innovatsionnoy ekonomiki [Problems of the quality of education in an innovative economy]. Sotsial’no-gumanitarnye Znaniya, no. 5, pp. 172–181 (in Russian).
( 398.78 kB ) 
( 387.01 kB )
Issue: 2, 2021
Series of issue: Issue 2
Rubric: MASTER’S PROGRAM AND CONTINUING EDUCATION
Pages: 78 — 87
Downloads: 606