ANTHROPOLOGICAL IDEAL IN THE NOVEL BY DOSTOYEVSKY “THE BROTHERS KARAMAZOV” IN THE RECEPTIONS OF RUSSIAN RELIGIOUS PHILOSOPHERS OF THE FRONTIER
DOI: 10.23951/1609-624X-2021-1-87-94
Introduction. This article attempts to study the reception of the anthropological ideal in the novel by F. M. Dostoevsky “The Brothers Karamazov” by Russian religious philosophers of the late 19th–20th centuries. Authentic understanding and interpretation of the writer’s key ideas about the human ideal, its values and the meaning of life is possible only in the context of Orthodox anthropology. The importance of this material is not limited to comprehending the problem of the anthropological ideal and its influence on the further development of Russian religious and philosophical thought; moreover, it allows one to explore the peculiarities of the artistic world of the novel, including the specifics of the representation of the author’s principle in the ideological field of the work, the peculiarities of the writer’s worldview. Material and methods. The research material was the work of V. S. Solovyov “Three Speeches in memory of Dostoevsky”, V. V. Rozanov “The Legend of the Grand Inquisitor”, N. А. Berdyaeva “Dostoevsky’s worldview”, N. O. Lossky “Dostoevsky and his Christian worldview”, the canonical text of the novel by F. M. Dostoevsky “The Brothers Karamazov”. The work uses cultural and historical, comparative, structural and typological methods. Results and discussion. The science of Dostoevsky begins precisely with the works of Russian religious philosophers and thinkers of the late XIX – early XX centuries, which ideas about the essence of man, his purpose, ideally make him a meaningful core of his thoughts. The final novel of the Great Pentateuch “The Brothers Karamazov” as a quintessence of Dostoevsky’s life and creative path, inextricably connected with the spiritual and axiological imperatives of Orthodox anthropology, is most often attracted by religious philosophers to reflect key dominants of their own philosophical concepts, analyze and argue ideas. This material allows us to explore the features of the artistic world of the novel, the specifics of representation in the ideological field of the work of the writer’s worldview and author’s beginning, the features of the anthropological ideal, inextricably linked for Dostoevsky with such spiritual and value dominants as Christ, Orthodoxy, holiness, nationality, good and evil, and to identify its influence on the further development of Russian religious and philosophical thought. Conclusion. Dostoevsky’s anthropological ideal, according to religious philosophers, is based on the Orthodox doctrine of man, revealing both the antinomy of human nature («pro et contra» in the writer’s terminology) and its previous striving for God, Truth, the need for good, outside of which the person is aware of his non-existence. The dominants of the anthropological ideal of the writer, which are reflected in the works of religious philosophers, are holiness, beauty as the ethical dominant of the person, and reproach in the values and meanings of Christ-centered Russian culture in their foundations.
Keywords: F. M. Dostoyevsky, “The Brothers Karamazov”, “Life of the Great Sinner”, “A Writer’s Diary”, axiology, values, Orthodoxy, Russian culture, spirituality, morality, anthropological ideal, holiness, hagiographic tradition, V. S. Soloviev, “Three Speeches in Memory of Dostoevsky”, V. V. Rozanov, “The Legend of the Grand Inquisitor”, N. А. Berdyaev, “Dostoevsky’s worldview”, N. O. Lossky, “Dostoevsky and His Christian Worldview”
References:
1. Zen’kovskiy V. V. Russkiye mysliteli i Evropa: Kritika evropeyskoy kul’tury u russkikh mysliteley [Russian Thinkers and Europe: Critique of European Culture by Russian Thinkers]. Paris, YMCA-Press Publ., 1926. 278 p. (in Russian).
2. Koshechko A. N. Tvorchestvo F. M. Dostoyevskogo v ideynom prostranstve gumanisticheskoy antropologii russkogo ekzistentsializma [F. M. Dostoyevskiy’s Creativity in Ideological Space of Humanistic Anthropology of the Russian Existentialism]. Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo pedagogicheskogo universiteta – TSPU Bulletin, 2014, vol. 9, pp. 96–103 (in Russian).
3. Mochul’skiy K. V. Dostoyevskiy: Zhizn’ i tvorchestvo [Dostoevsky: Life and Work]. Paris, YMCA–Press Publ., 1980. 561 p. (in Russian).
4. Solov’ev V. S. Filosofiya iskusstva i literaturnaya kritika [The Meaning of Love: Selected Works. Compiler, introductory article, comments by N. I. Tsimbaev]. Moscow, Pravda Publ., 1991. 702 p. (in Russian).
5. Dostoevskiy F. M. Polnoye sobraniye sochineniy: v 30 tomakh [Complete works: in 30 volumes]. Leningrad, Nauka Publ., 1972–1986 (in Russian).
6. Losskiy N. O. Dostoyevskiy i ego khristianskoye miroponimaniye [Dostoevsky and his Christian worldview]. New York, Izdatel’stvo im. Chekhova Publ., 1953. 406 p. (in Russian).
7. Losskiy N. O. Usloviya absolyutnogo dobra: Osnovy etiki; Kharakter russkogo naroda [Conditions of absolute goodness: Fundamentals of ethics; The character of the Russian people]. Moscow, Politizdat Publ., 1991. 368 p. (in Russian).
8. Berdyaev N. A. Russkaya ideya. Mirosozertsaniye Dostoyevskogo [Russian idea. Dostoevsky’s worldview]. Moscow, Eksmo Publ., 2016. 512 p. (in Russian).
9. Berdyaev N. A. Dukhi russkoy revolyutsii [Spirits of the Russian Revolution]. From: Askol’dov S. A., Berdyayev N. A., Bulgakov S.A. et al. Iz glubiny: Sbornik statey o russkoy revolyutsii. Reprintnoye vosproizvedeniye izdaniya (1918) [From the Depths: Collection of Articles on the Russian Revolution. Reprint reproduction edition (1918)]. Moscow, Moscow University Publ., 1990. Pp. 55–89 (in Russian).
10. Rozanov V. V. O pisatel’stve i pisatelyakh. Pod redaktsiyey A. N. Nikolyukina [About writing and writers. Edited by A. N. Nikolyukin]. Moscow, Respublika Publ., 1995. 734 p. (in Russian).
11. Rozanov V. V. Legenda o Velikom inkvizitore F. M. Dostoyevskogo. Opyt kriticheskogo kommentariya s prilozheniyem dvukh etyudov o Gogole [The legend of the Grand Inquisitor F. M. Dostoevsky. Experience of critical commentary with the addition of two etudes about Gogol]. Polnoye sobraniye sochineniy: v 35 tomakh. T. 1 [Complete Works: in 35 volumes. Vol. 1]. Saint Petersburg, Rostok Publ., 2014. Pp. 15–162 803–820 (in Russian).
12. Shilova A. S., Koshechko A. N. Agiograficheskaya traditsiya v tvorchestve F. M. Dostoyevskogo (na materiale «Zhitiya Velikogo greshnika», romana «Brat’ya Karamazovy»): k postanovke problem [Hagiographic tradition in the work of F. M. Dostoevsky (on the material “The Life of the Great Sinner”, the novel “The Brothers Karamazov”): to the statement of problems]. Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo pedagogicheskogo universiteta – TSPU Bulletin, 2019, vol. 9, pp. 128–135 (in Russian).
( 406.25 kB ) 
( 397.22 kB )
Issue: 1, 2021
Series of issue: Issue 1
Rubric: PROBLEMS AND POETICS OF RUSSIAN LITERATURE OF THE XIX–XXI CENTURIES
Pages: 87 — 94
Downloads: 618