LEGAL DISCOURSE IN THE ASPECT OF INSTITUTIONAL SPECIFICITY: LINGUISTIC ASPECT
DOI: 10.23951/1609-624X-2020-5-96-102
Introduction. The article highlights the specifics of the legal discourse in the aspect of its institutional interdependence and space conceptualization of metaphor terminology. The aim of the article is to identify the interrelation between the SPACE (horizontal/vertical) conceptualization of the metaphorical terminology of the Russian legal discourse and the horizontal line classification by branches of law and the vertical hierarchical system of the Russian legislation system. Material and methods. The legal discourse notion and its specificity is considered through the prism of legislative system branch classification accepted in the Russian Federation. The conceptual structure of the legislation system arranged in the form of the horizontal line classification by branches of law and the vertical hierarchical system of conceptual metaphor representation is realized through the terminology of the legal discourse. Results and discussion. Conceptualization in the field of metaphor terminology directly reflects the conceptual structure of the law branch. Although there is a broad variety of grounds for classification typology, the conceptualization of knowledge structures depends directly on the branch of law. Legal branch metaphor terms are constructs of a particular branch of legal discourse, which transfer special concepts of mentality regarding the objects of a particular branch of legal discourse. Conclusion. The analysis of the specifics of the institutional legal discourse reveals the conditionality and interdependence of the knowledge conceptualization within metaphor modeling in the legal terminology. The nominative means for the concepts system transfer are based on the terminology concept system and are determined mainly by the legal context (i.e. legal branch). The content of the knowledge structures in the legal discourse terminology is determined and influenced by the evolution of the legal knowledge within the framework of language and socio-cultural community.
Keywords: legal discourse, space conceptualization, legal term, conceptual metaphor
References:
1. Khomutova T. N., Shefer E. A. Yuridicheskiy diskurs: problemy i perspektivy issledovaniya [Legal discourse: problems and research prospects]. South Ural State University Bulletin. Seriya: Linguistics, 2019, vol. 16, no. 3, pp. 44–53 (in Russian).
2. Golev N. D. Yuridicheskiy aspect yazyka v lingvisticheskom osveshchenii [Legal aspect of language from linguistic one rview]. Yurislingvistika – 1. Problemy i perspektivy [Legal linguistics-1. Problems and prospects]. Barnaul, 1999. p. 11–58 (in Russian).
3. Kosonogova O. V. Kharakteristiki yuridicheskogo diskursa: granitsy, soderzhaniye, parametry [Characheristics of legal discourse: boundaries, contents, parametres]. Istoricheskaya i sotsial’no-obrazovatel’naya mysl’ – Historical and social-educational idea, 2015, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 61–65 (in Russian).
4. Martyshko N. Yu. Smyslovaya modifikatsiya terminov v sovremennom zakonodatel’nom diskurse. Dis. kand. filol. nauk [Meaning modification of terminology in modern legal discourse. Diss. cand. philol. sci.]. Volgograd, 2015. 201 p. (in Russian).
5. Palashevskaya I. V. Aksiologicheskiye osnovaniya yuridicheskogo diskursa: aksiomy prava [Axiological foundations of legal discourse: legal axioms]. Nauchnyy dialog – Scientific Dialogue, 2017, no. 11, pp. 144–156 (in Russian).
6. Popova E. V. Priroda sudebnogo diskursa [Nature of legal discourse]. Vestnik Orenburgskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta – Vestnik of the Orenburg State University, 2016, no. 6, (194), pp. 24–29 (in Russian).
7. Kharina R. S. Yuridicheskiy tekst kak ob’yekt lingvisticheskogo issledovaniya [Legal text as the object for linguistic investigation]. Vestnik Bashkirskogo universiteta – Bulletin of Bashkir University, 2014, vol. 19, no. 3, pp. 982–986 (in Russian).
8. Khizhnyak S. P. Novoye v issledovanii terminologicheskikh sistem (na primere yuridicheskoy terminologii) [New issues in terminology system research (based on legal terminology)]. Izvestiya vysshikh uchebnykh zavedeniy, Povolzhskiy region. Gumanitarnye nauki. Filologiyayu, no. 1, 2008, pp. 92–99 (in Russian).
9. Susov A. A. Modelirovaniye diskursa v terminakh teorii ritoricheskoy struktury [Discourse modeling in terminology of rhetoric structure]. Vestnik Voronezhskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriya: Filologiya. Zhurnalistika – Proceedings of Voronezh State University. Series: Philology. Journalism, 2006, no. 2, pp. 10–13 (in Russian).
10. Kozhemyakin E. A. Sovremennyy diskurs analiz. Elektronnyy zhurnal [Modern discourse analysis. E-journal]. 2014. 63 p. (in Russian). URL: http://discourseanalysis.org/ada3/st30.shtml (accessed 21 March 2020).
11. Van Dejk T. A. Yazyk. Poznaniye. Kommunikatsiya [Language. Cognition. Communication]. Blagoveshchensk, BGK im. I. A. Boduena de Kurtene Publ., 2000. 308 p. (in Russian).
12. Rusakova O. F. Osnovnye teoretiko-metodologichesiye podkhody k interpretatsii diskursa [Basic theoretical and methodological approaches to discourse interpretation]. Nauchnyy ezhegodnik Instituta filisofii i prava UrO RAN, 2007, no. 7, pp. 5–34 (in Russian).
13. Jorgansen M. V., Filips L. Dzh. Diskurs-analiz. Teoriya i metod [Discourse analysis. Theory and method. Transl. from Eng.]. Kharkiv, Gumanitarnyy Tsentr Publ., 2008. 325 p. (in Russian).
14. Johnson-Laird P. N. Mental models. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1983. 398 р.
15. Duli R., Levinson S. Analiz diskursa: bazovye ponyatiya [Discourse analysis: basic notions]. Moscow, Institut perevoda Biblii Publ., 2019. 168 p. (in Russian).
16. Budayev E. V. Metaforicheskoye modelirovaniye postsovetskoy deystvitel’nosti v rossiyskom i britanskom politicheskom diskurse. Dis. kand. filol. nauk [Metaphor modeling of post Soviet reality in Russian and British political discourse. Diss. cand. philol. sci.]. Ekaterinburg, 2006. 406 p. (in Russian).
17. Pigolkin A. S., Golovistikova A. N., Dmitriyev Yu. A. Teoriya gosudarstva i prava: uchebnik dlya akademicheskogo bakalavriata [State and law theory: tutorial for academic bachelors]. Edited by A. S. Pigolkin, Yu. A. Dmitriyev. Moscow, Yurayt Publ., 2019. 516 p. (in Russian). URL: https://www.biblio-online.ru/bcode/431082 (accessed 20 March 2020).
18. Lakoff D., Dzhonson M. Metafory, kotorymi my zhivem [Metaphors we live by: transl. from Eng.]. Edited and prefaced by A. N. Baranov. Moscow, Editorial URSS Publ., 2004. 256 p. (in Russian).
19. Lakoff G. Zhenshchiny, ogon’ i opasnye veshchi: chto kategorii yazyka govoryat nam o myshlenii [Women, fire and dangerous things: what language categories tell us about cognition]. Moscow, Yazyki slavyanskoy kul’tury Publ., 2004. 792 p. (in Russian).
20. Mishankina N. A. Mental’nye prostranstvo nauchnogo teksta: Metaforicheskiye modeli [Mental space of scientific text: metaphor models]. Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta – Tomsk State University Journal, 2007, no. 297, pp. 7–11 (in Russian).
21. Mishankina N. A. Metafora v terminologicheskikh sistemakh: funktsii i modeli [Metaphor in terminology systems: functions and models]. Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Filologiya – Tomsk State University Journal of Philology, 2012, no. 4 (20), pp. 32–45 (in Russian).
22. Evtushenko E. N. Kontsept “Prostranstvennaya oriyentatsiya” v angliyskoy i russkoy lingvokul’turakh. Avtoref. dis. kand. filol. nauk [The concept of ‘space orientation’ in English and Russian lingvocultures. Diss. cand. philol. sci.]. Volgograd, 2004. 28 p. (in Russian).
23. Slovar’ russkogo yazyka: v 4 t. [Russian language dictionary: 4 volumes]. Ed. by A. P. Evgen’yeva. Moscow, Russkiy yazyk Publ., 1983. 749 p. (in Russian).
( 404.65 kB ) 
( 398.66 kB )
Issue: 5, 2020
Series of issue: Issue 5
Rubric: TOPICAL ISSUES OF MODERN LINGUISTICS
Pages: 96 — 102
Downloads: 655