VALUE POTENTIAL OF EXISTENTIAL DIALOGUE IN THE SYSTEM OF PEDAGOGICAL IDEAS OF F. M. DOSTOEVSKY (THE STUDY OF „A WRITER`S DIARY” AND EGO-DOCUMENTS 1863–1880)
DOI: 10.23951/1609-624X-2020-3-22-29
Introduction. Phenomenological discourse in literature is connected with methodological orientation on perception of literary work as a phenomenon of author’s reality and event in reader perception. Due to such dialogue biorientation, the literary text ceases to be understood as a closed object, reaching the level of existential communication between the author and the reader with the basis for value event. Which makes it possible to talk about the possibility of revealing the perceiving consciousness through a dialog search for one’s word and another’s word. Materials and methods. The study uses analytical, descriptive, axiological methods and a phenomenological approach. The material for the study is the chapter of “A Writer’s Dairy” by F. M. Dostoevsky “One of the Modern Fales” (1873), ego-documents: notebooks 1863–1864, letters to A. G. Kovner (1877), N. P. Peterson (1878) and E. F. Yunge (1880). Results and discussion. As part of the axiological analysis of the text, the category “author’s position” was identified as an “aesthetic coefficient” of the value orientation vector of the literary work. The “position of the author” is understood through the dialogical principle, drawn by M. M. Bakhtin as the first definition in the polyphonic structure of the works of F. M. Dostoevsky. The dialogue of the writer is an all-encompassing concept, with neither temporary nor simple borders. This was directly reflected in the idea, genre and composition of “A Writer’s Diary”. Other modality, based on the conjugation of the Self and the Other consciousness, is characterized by position-value variability. The existential consciousness of the writer manifests itself in a word having a dialogue orientation. Dialogue is an attributive characteristic of existential consciousness. Personal Self shows itself as an object and subject through the situation of analysis of the process of self-knowledge. Conclusion. The process of the reader discovering not just the spiritual and moral foundations of the author’s personality, but the very situation of their formation is important in the situation of the value orientation of the young generation. Through the dialogue with the consciousness of the perceiving subject, Dostoevsky opens the way for the reader to acquire his Self (both I-author and I-reader).
Keywords: dialogue, author, value analysis, Other, existential consciousness, F. M. Dostoevsky, “A Writer’s Dairy”
References:
1. Khesle V. Krizis individual’noy i kollektivnoy identichnosti [Crisis of individual and collective identity]. Voprosy filosofii, 1994, no. 10, рр. 112–123 (in Russian).
2. Yaspers K. Filosofiya. Kniga vtoraya. Prosvetleniye ekzistentsii [Philosophy. The second book. Existence enlightenment. Translation from German by A. K. Sudakov]. Мoscow, Kanon+, ROOI Reabilitatsiya Publ., 2012. 448 р. (in Russian).
3. Sartr ZH.-P. CHto takoye literatura? [What is literature? Translation from French by N. I. Poltoratskaya]. Minsk, Popurri Publ., 1999. 448 р. (in Russian).
4. Bakhtin M. M. Sobraniye sochineniy: v 7 t. [Collected works: in 7 vol.]. Мoscow, Izdatel’stvo russkiye slovari, Yazyki slavyanskoy kul’tury Publ., 2003. (in Russian).
5. Dostoyevskiy F. M. Polnoye sobraniye sochineniy i pisem: v 30 t. [Complete works and letters: in the 30 vol.]. Leningrad, Nauka Publ., 1972–1990 (in Russian).
6. Pats’orka E. I., Koshechko A. N. F. M. Dostoyevskiy i L. N. Tolstoy: opyt sopostavitel’nogo analiza pedagogicheskikh idey [F. M. Dostoevsky and L. N. Tolstoy: experience of comparative analysis of pedagogical ideas]. Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo pedagogicheskogo universiteta – TSPU Bulletin, 2019, vol. 6 (203), рр. 28–37 (in Russian). DOI: 10.23951/1609-624X-2019-6-28-37
7. Aleksandrov M. A. Fedor Mikhaylovich Dostoyevskiy v vospominaniyakh tipografskogo naborshchika v 1872–1881 godakh [Fe dor Mikhaylovich Dostoevsky in memoirs of the typographical typesetter in 1872–1881]. Dostoyevskiy F. M. v vospominaniyakh sovremennikov: v 2 t. T. 2 [Fedor Dostoevsky in memoirs of contemporaries: in 2 vol. Vol. 2]. Мoscow, Khudozhestvennaya literatura Publ., 1990. Pp. 251–325 (in Russian).
8. Kazakov A. A. Tsennostnaya arkhitektonika proizvedeniy F. M. Dostoyevskogo [Value architect of the works of F. M. Dostoevsky]. Tomsk, Tomsk University Publ., 2012. 254 р. (in Russian).
9. Dostoyevskiy F. M. Zapisnye knizhki i tetradi 1860–1881 gg. [Notebooks and notebooks of 1860–1881]. Literaturnoye naslediye T. 83: Neizdannyy Dostoyevskiy [Literary heritage Vol. 83: Unpublished Dostoyevsky]. Мoscow, Nauka Publ., 1971. 727 p. (in Russian).
10. Koshechko A. N. Dostoyevskiy i apostasiya: k voprosu ob atributivnykh kharakteristikakh ekzistentsial’nogo soznaniya [Dostoevsky and apostasy: to the question of attribution characteristics of existential consciousness]. Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo pedagogicheskogo universiteta – TSPU Bulletin, 2013, vol. 11 (139), рр. 23–31 (in Russian).
11. Koshechko A. N. Formy ekzistentsial’nogo soznaniya v tvorchestve F. M. Dostoyevskogo (k postanovke problemy) [Forms of existential consciousness in the work of F. M. Dostoevsky (to the statement of the problem)]. Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo pedagogicheskogo universiteta – TSPU Bulletin, 2011, vol. 7(109), рр. 192–199 (in Russian).
12. Gabdullina V. I. “Bludnyy syn” kak model’ povedeniya: evangel’skiy motiv v kontekste biografii i tvorchestva F. M. Dostoyevskogo [“The Prodigal Son” as a pattern of behavior: an evangelical motif in the context of F. M. Dostoevsky’s biography and creativity]. Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo pedagogicheskogo universiteta – TSPU Bulletin, 2005, vol. 6 (50), рр. 16–22 (in Russian).
13. Zamanskaya V. V. Ekzistentsial’naya traditsiya v russkoy literature XX veka. Dialogi na stranitsakh stoletiy [Existential tradition in 20th century Russian literature. Dialogues on the Pages of Centuries]. Мoscow, Flinta; Nauka Publ., 2002. 302 р. (in Russian).
14. Lunacharskiy A. V. O “mnogogolosnosti” Dostoyevskogo (po povodu knigi M. M. Bakhtina “Problemy tvorchestva Dostoyevskogo”) [About Dostoevsky’s “multi-voice” (about M. M. Bahtin ‘s book “Problems of Dostoevsky’s Creativity”)]. Vospominaniya i issledovaniya o tvorchestve F. M. Dotoyevskogo. Kniga chetvertaya [Memories and research about the work of F. M. Donoyevsky. The fourth book]. Мoscow, Berlin, Direkt-Media Publ., 2015, рр. 21–62 (in Russian).
15. Tyupa V. I. Analiz khudozhestvennogo teksta [Analysis of the belles-lettres text]. Мoscow, Akademiya Publ., 2009. 336 р. (in Russian).
Issue: 3, 2020
Series of issue: Issue 3
Rubric: TOPICAL ISSUES OF LITERARY CRITICISM
Pages: 22 — 29
Downloads: 733