METHODS AND TOOLS OF ORGANIZING TEACHER’S METHODICAL ACTIVITY
DOI: 10.23951/1609-624X-2020-1-56-60
Introduction. The article is devoted to the problem of organizing the methodological activities of a school teacher and university teacher. Methodological activity is the most important component of a teacher’s professional activity, therefore it is important to understand in what ways it can be organized. This aspect is important not only for teachers of private methods, but also for any teacher of higher education, as he is a methodologist - the organizer of the assimilation of educational material by students. When preparing undergraduates as potential teachers, it is important to teach them different ways of organizing methodological activities. Materials and methods. The article was written on the basis of the author’s generalization of the teaching experience for undergraduates “Methods of Teaching Communicative Disciplines”, as well as many years of experience in teaching a course in teaching Russian to future elementary school teachers. Master students not only got acquainted with these methods at lectures, but also actively discussed them in tutorial mode. A comparative analysis of reproductive, constructive, research methods of organizing activities is used. Results and discussion. The characteristic of different ways of organizing methodological activities is given: reproductive, constructive, research. Тhe following comparison criteria were used: positions of participants in joint educational activities, subject of methodological activities, methodological tools, features of working with educational information, organization of the educational environment, result. Conclusion. As a basic principle of organizing methodological activities, co-organization and mutual complementarity of different methods are proposed. The methods are correlated with different models of the organization of joint activities of the teacher and students.
Keywords: magistracy, methodological activities, organization methods, training session, interaction models
References:
1. Shchedrovitskiy G. P. Sistema pedagogicheskikh issledovaniy (Metodologicheskiy analiz) [The system of pedagogical research: (Methodological analysis)]. Pedagogika i logika [Pedagogy and logic]. Moscow, Kastal’ Publ., 1992. Pp. 16–200 (in Russian).
2. Pozdeeva S. I. Prepodavatel’ vysshey shkoly: metodist, issledovatel’, novator? [Higher school teacher: methodologist, researcher, innovator?]. Vyssheye obrazovaniye v Rossii – Higher Education in Russia, 2017, no. 3, pp. 52–58 (in Russian).
3. Nikitina L. A. Vliyaniye issledovatel’skoy kompetentnosti na kachestvo metodicheskoy podgotovki pedagoga [The influence of research competence on the quality of teacher training]. Barnaul, AltSPU Publ., 2009. 205 p. (in Russian).
4. Pozdeeva S. I. Innovatsionnoye razvitiye sovremennoy nachal’noy shkoly: postroyeniye otkrytogo sovmestnogo deystviya pedagoga i rebenka [Innovative development of modern elementary school: creation of open joint action of the teacher and child]. Tomsk, 2013. 168 p. (in Russian).
5. Pozner R. Ratsional’nyy diskurs i poeticheskaya kommunikatsiya: metody lingvisticheskogo, literaturnogo i filosofskogo analiza. Nauch. red. I. P. Kuzheleva-Sagan; per. s angl. S. S. Nosovoy [Rational discourse and poetic communication: methods of linguistic, literary, and philosophical analysis. Scientific editor I. P. Kuzheleva-Sagan; translation from English S. S. Nosova]. Tomsk, TSU Publ., 2015. 296 p. (in Russian).
6. Plotnikova N. N., Pozdeeva S. I. Forms of organizing collective educational activity in primary school. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2015, vol. 214, pp. 51–58.
7. Pozdeeva S. I. The collaborative teacher pupil activity as a condition of children communicative competence development. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2015, vol. 206 (2015), pp. 333–336.
8. Prozumentova G. N. Shkola sovmestnoy deyatel’nosti. Eksperiment: razvitiye tseli vospitaniya i issledovatel’skoy deyatel’nosti pedagogov shkoly [School of joint activities. Experiment: the development objectives of education and research activities of school teachers]. Tomsk, 1994. 41 p. (in Russian).
9. Nikitina L. A., Pozdeyeva S. I. Pedagogicheskoye naslediye G. N. Prozumentovoy kak oriyentir dlya pedagogicheskoy nauki i praktiki [The pedagogical heritage of G. N. Prozumentova as a benchmark for science and educational practice]. Nauchno-pedagogicheskoye obozreniye – Pedagogical Review, 2015, vol. 4 (10), pp. 7–14 (in Russian).
10. Peterson L. G. Deyatel’nostnyy metod obucheniya: obrazovatel’naya sistema «Shkola 2000…» [Activity educational approach: educational system “School 2000…”]. Postroyeniye nepreryvnoy sfery obrazovaniya [Building a continuing education sector]. Moscow, APK I PPRO, UMTs “Shkola 2000...” Publ., 2007. 448 p. (in Russian).
( 360.07 kB ) 
( 352.79 kB )
Issue: 1, 2020
Series of issue: Issue 1
Rubric: HIGHER EDUCATION
Pages: 56 — 60
Downloads: 755