OLIGARCHY’S LINGUISTIC INTERPRETATION IN THE ENGLISH LANGUAGE
DOI: 10.23951/1609-624X-2019-4-77-84
Introduction. The paper is devoted to the oligarchy’s description as an axiologically marked phenomenon from the language point of view. The necessity to take into account the perception of oligarchy in other cultures, the analysis of the national peculiarities of the oligarchy representation in the language, the need for the comparative research make the study of the mentioned phenomenon up-to-date. Material and methods. Mass-media texts retrieved from the sub-corpus of the British national corpus (NOW corpus) serve as the material for the analysis. NOW corpus contains newspaper and magazine articles dated 2010-2018. Results and discussion. Collocation analysis of the term oligarchy in the British national corpus is carried out according to the following criteria: types, characteristic features, co-occurrence with other concepts, metaphoric conceptualization of the phenomenon under study. As the result of the analysis it is shown that oligarchy’s representation in the British mass-media discourse is determined by social and discursive peculiarities of a definite linguo-culture. Alongside with the universal features (the connection of oligarchy with a definite sphere of human activity) the English language possesses special terms for denoting this destructive phenomenon in this or that country. In examining the relation between oligarchy and other negative phenomena the latter is viewed not as different from the rest of the destructive things but as synonymous to them (corruption and oligarchy, despotism and oligarchy, imperialism and oligarchy). The metaphoric representation of oligarchy is not constituted by a wide range of features. The theoretical relevance of the research consists in the development of the mass-media discourse and axiological linguistics’ theory through the analysis of the ordinary definition of the term on the basis of newspapers and magazines. The applicability of the study consists in the possibility of using the results of the analysis while studying other axiologically marked phenomena in different cultures and through the prism of different time segments. Conclusion. The paper outlines possible prospects for research, including consideration of the interpretation of the phenomenon of oligarchy on the material of English discourse in the diachronic aspect, which will complement the results and identify those aspects of the presentation of the analyzed phenomenon that are not present in the representation of the oligarchy phenomenon in modern English.
Keywords: oligarchy, British national corpus, mass-media discourse, destructive phenomenon, axiologically marked phenomenon
References:
1. Kupchin N.N. Politicheskaya vlast’ i oligarhiya [Political power and oligarchy]. Obozrevatel’ – Observer, 2008, no 1(226), pp. 62–75 (in Russian).
2. Schumacher G., Giger N. Who Leads the Party? On Membership Size, Selectorates and Part Oligarchy. Political Studies, 2017, vol. 65, pp. 162–181.
3. Samarin A. N. Nravstvennaya degradatsiya kak ekologicheskaya ugroza [Moral degradation and ecological threat]. Konfliktologia, 2010, no.1, pp. 163–170 (in Russian).
4. Martin E. J. Oligarchy, Anarchy, and Social Justice. Contemporary Justice, 2015, vol. 18, issue 1, pp. 55–67.
5. Korom P. Elites: History of the Concept. International Encyclopedia of the Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2015, pp. 390-395.
6. Panyushkina E. V., Shpaltakov V. P. Istoriya formirovaniya ekonomicheskikh interesov rossiyskoy oligarkhii [The history of formation of economic interests of the Russian oligarchy]. Izvestiya Ural’skogo gosudarstvennogo ekonomicheskogo universiteta – Proceedings of the Ural State University of Economics, 2010, no. 5 (31), pp. 5–11 (in Russian).
7. Akerman A., Naghavi A., Seim A. Oligarchies and Development in a Global Economy: a Tale of Two Elites. Economic Inquiry, 2016, vol. 54, issue 1, pp. 229–246.
8. Kondrat’eva O. N. Metaforicheskaya reprezentaciya oligarhii v rossijskom mediadiskurse XXI veka [Metaphorical representation of oligarchy in the Russian media-discourse of the XXst century]. Nauchnyy dialog – Scietific Dialogue, 2016, no. 9 (57), pp. 47–57 (in Russian).
9. Kondrat’yeva O. N. «Slovar’ politicheskikh terminov v SMI» kak novyy leksikograficheskiy produkt [“Dictionary of political terms in the massmedia” as new lexicographic product]. Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Filologiya – Tomsk State University Journal of Philology, 2016, no. 6 (44), pp. 38–49 (in Russian).
10. Gudkov D. B., Kovshova M. L. Telesnyy kod russkoy kul’tury: materialy k slovaryu [Somatic code of the Russian culture: materials to the dictionary]. Moscow, Gnozis Publ., 2007. 288 p. (in Russian).
11. Dobrosklonskaya T. G. Massmediynyy diskurs kak ob”ekt nauchnogo opisaniya [Mass-media discourse as an object of the scientific description]. Nauchnye vedomosti. Seriya «Gumanitarnye nauki» – Scientific Bulletin. Liberal Arts Series, 2014, no. 13 (184), iss. 22, pp. 181–187 (in Russian).
12. Guseynova E. T. Kontsept «oligarkh» v sovremennom angliyskom yazyke [The concept “oligarch” in the modern English language]. Izvestiya Dagestanskogo gosudarstvennogo pedagogicheskogo universiteta. Obshchestvennye i gumanitarnye nauki – Proceedings of Dagestan State Pedagogical University, 2015, no. 3 (32), pp. 28–31 (in Russian).
13. Stepushova L. Oligarkhiya okonchatel’no podmyala pod sebya SShA [Oligarchy completely defeated the USA] (in Russian). URL: https://www.pravda.ru/world/northamerica/usacanada/24-04-2014/1205676-rich-0/ (accessed 24 September 2018).
14. Issers O. S. Diskursivnye praktiki nashego vremeni [Modern discursive practices]. Moscow, LENAND Publ., 2015. 272 p. (in Russian).
15. Solopova O. A., Valiyeva G. R., Voroshilova M. B. Korpusnoye issledovaniye metafor so sferoy-mishen’yu «Rossiya» (na materiale sovremennogo amerikanskogo diskursa) [Corpus study of the metaphors with the domain “Russia” (on the material of the modern Russian language]. Vestnik YUUrGU – SUSU Bulletin, 2017, vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 37–43 (in Russian).
16. Grudeva E. V. Kak korpusnaya lingvistika izmenila nashi predstavleniya o yazyke [How corpus linguistics changed our conception of language]. Problemy porozhdeniya i vospriyatiya rechi [Problems of Speech Production and Perception]. Cherepovets, 2015. Pp. 108–115 (in Russian).
17. Wikipedia. URL: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ (accessed 25 September 2018).
18. Karasik V. I. Aksiogennaya situatsiya kak edinitsa tsennostnoy kartiny mira [Axiogenic situation as an evaluative world mapping unit]. Politicheskaya lingvistika – Political Linguistics, 2014, no. 1 (47), pp. 65–75 (in Russian).
19. Trofimova Zh. V. Substantivnaya metafora s oboznacheniyem emotsiy (na materiale angliyskogo yazyka) [Nominal metaphor denoting emotions (on the material of the English language]. Vestnik Omskogo universiteta – Omsk State University Bulletin, 2010, no.2, pp. 206–2010. (in Russian).
20. Chudinov A. P., Budayev E. V. Diakhronicheskaya dinamika morbial’nykh metafor v politicheskoy kommunikatsii [Diachronic dynamic of morbial metaphor in political communication]. Russkii yazyk i literatura v prostranstve mirovoi kul’tury [The Russian language and literature in modern culture]. 2015. Pp. 225–229 (in Russian).
21. British National Corpus. NOW Corpus. URL: http://corpus.byu.edu/now (accessed 8 October 2018).
( 382.19 kB ) 
( 372.86 kB )
Issue: 4, 2019
Series of issue: Issue 4
Rubric: CURRENT ISSUES IN LINGUISTICS
Pages: 77 — 84
Downloads: 757