ON THE ISSUE OF INNOVATIVE-EDUCATIONAL COMPETENCY OF A TEACHER WITH M.A. DEGREE
DOI: 10.23951/1609-624X-2019-3-69-76
Introduction. The main point of the paper is innovative changes in education. The authors suppose that the initiator and the mechanism of these changes may become the master training at the pedagogical university. In this case, this training needs a structural and content transformation, the essential elements of which are presented in the thematic blocks of this article. Results and discussion. Selection of the field of communications as a metasubject activity becomes a challenge for professional training, encourages a rethinking of the educational work, which is consistent with the second stage of higher education. These include the creation in the master’s program of innovatively oriented training programs in which new forms of knowledge and educational interaction will be tested. Such a form is in line with the development and implementation of the visual epistemology in the educational process, as well as with the use of metadisciplinary semiotic structures in the design of the educational process. It is proved that it is impossible to acquire new metasubject competence in the context of the implementation of traditional didactic schemes. Conclusion. The contents offered by the authors are not ready-made solutions, but are sets of heuristics aimed at actualizing the discussion about the meaning and purpose of the master’s level of teacher training. The proposed modification assumes the creation of design-development directions (programs and training courses) at the institute of magistracy, in which innovative orientation acts both as a goal and as a content of education. The learning content includes two substructural elements: deconstructive and constructive. A form of their implementation is the joint activity of participants in the educational process.
Keywords: innovative education, master training, visual epistemology, metasubject practical competency, fictional semiotic designs, case study
References:
1. Toffl er E. Tret’ya volna [The third wave]. Moscow, AST Publ., 2010. 331 p. (in Russian).
2. Prozumentova G. N. Obrazovatel’nyye innovatsii: fenomen “lichnogo prisutstviya” i potentsial upravleniya (opyt gumanitarnogo issledovaniya) [Educational innovations: the phenomenon of “personal presence” and management potential (the experience of humanitarian research)]. Tomsk, TSU Publ., 2016. 413 p. (in Russian).
3. Prozumentova G. N. Metodologiya i metodiki gumanitarnogo issledovaniya obrazovatel’nykh innovatsiy (vystupleniye na metodologicheskom seminare v TGU) [Methodology and methods of humanitarian research of educational innovations (presentation at the methodological seminar at TSU)]. Potentsial kontseptsii issledovaniya i upravleniya obrazovatel’nymi innovatsiyami G. N. Prozumentovoy v reshenii zadach razvitiya obrazovaniya [The potential of the concept of research and management of educational innovations of G. N. Prozumentova in solving problems of education development]. Tomsk, TSU Publ., 2017. Pp. 8–28 (in Russian).
4. Pozdeyeva S. I. Magistratura kak prostranstvo professional’no-lichnostnogo razvitiya studenta i prepodavatelya [Master’s degree environment as a space for personal professional development of students and professors]. Vyssheye obrazovaniye v Rossii – Higher Education in Russia, 2018, no. 3, pp. 144–152 (in Russian).
5. Schnettler B. W strone socjologii wiedzy wizualnej. Przeglad Socjologii Jakosciowej – Review of Qualitative Sociology, 2008, vol. IV, no. 3, pp. 116–142.
6. Klus-Stanska D. Paradygmaty dydaktyki. Myslec teoria o praktyce. Warsaw, PWN Publ., 2018. 278 p.
7. Sapunov M. B., Polonnikov A. A. Uchebnyy predmet: epistemologicheskiy krizis i yego preodoleniye [Academic subject problem: epistemological crisis and its overcoming]. Vyssheye obrazovaniye v Rossii – Higher Education in Russia, 2018, no. 12, pp. 144–157 (in Russian).
8. Ben’yamin V. O “meta-” [About “meta-”]. Tsentr eksperimental’noy muzeologii [Center for experimental museology]. 2017 (in Russian). URL: http://redmuseum.church/about_meta (accessed 7 February 2019).
9. Mamardashvili M. K. Kak ya ponimayu fi losofi yu [How I understand philosophy]. Moscow, Progress Publ., 1990. 368 p. (in Russian).
10. Shilkov U. M. Istoriya kak vymysel, ili O “novom istorizme” [History as fi ction, or the “new historicism”]. Metodologiya gumanitarnogo znaniya v perspektive XXI veka. K 80-letiyu professora M. S. Kagana: materialy Mezhdunar. nauch. konf., Sankt-Peterburg, 2001. Seriya “Symposium” [Methodology of humanitarian knowledge in the perspective of the XXI century. On the 80th anniversary of Professor M. S. Kagan: materials of the Intern. Scientifi c Conference, St. Petersburg, 2001 Ser. “Symposium”]. St. Petersburg, SPb. fi los. obshch. Publ., 2001. Vol. 12. Pp. 265–274 (in Russian).
11. Domanska E. Filosofi ya istorii posle postmodernizma [Philosophy of history after postmodernism]. Moscow, Kanon+ Publ., 2010. 400 p. (in Russian).
12. Knorr-Cetina K. Primitive classifi cation and postmodernity: Towards a sociological notion of fi ction. Theory, culture & society, 1994, vol. 11, pp. 1–22.
13. Polonnikov A. A. Fiktsional’nyy diskurs obrazovaniya [The fi ctional discourse of education]. Aktual’nyye psikhologicheskiye problemy nepreryvnogo obrazovaniya cheloveka: materialy Mezhdunar. nauch. konf. [Actual psychological problems of lifelong education of a person: materials of the Intern. scientifi c conf., Minsk, 2010]. Minsk, NIO Publ., 2011. Pp. 92–97 (in Russian).
14. Ankersmit F. R. Istoriya i tropologiya: vzlet i padeniye metafory [History and tropology: the rise and fall of metaphor]. Moscow, Progress-Traditsiya Publ., 2003. 496 p. (in Russian).
15. Prozumentova G. N., Polonnikov A. A. Case study kak metod porozhdeniya innovatsionnykh izmeneniy v obrazovanii [Humanities studies as an attribute for educational innovation]. Vyssheye obrazovaniye v Rossii – Higher Education in Russia, 2014, no. 11, pp. 47–57 (in Russian).
16. Savchuk V. V. Fenomen povorota v kul’ture ХХ veka [The phenomenon of turn in 20th century culture]. Kontsepty kul’tury – Concepts of Culture, 2013, no. 1 (10), pp. 93–108 (in Russian).
17. Popper K. Nishcheta istoritsizma [The Poverty of historicism]. Moscow, Progress – VIA Publ., 1993. 187 p. (in Russian).
( 468.24 kB ) 
( 462.09 kB )
Issue: 3, 2019
Series of issue: Issue 3
Rubric: COMPETENCE APPROACH IN EDUCATION
Pages: 69 — 76
Downloads: 674