NETWORK APPROACH TO THE ADDITIONAL EDUCATION: STRATEGY AND TACTIC
DOI: 10.23951/1609-624X-2019-3-35-41
Introduction. The lack of current theoretical and methodological works of inclusion of modern network discourse in the context of an additional education is an important problem of a pedagogical reality. The aim of the article is justification of methodological potential of a network approach for the development of additional education. Material and methods. The study is based on theoretical and methodological constructs, which are typical for modern stage of development of a network approach, which is represented by social network analysis (SNA), relational sociology, actor-network theory (ANT) and theory of social upbringing. Results and discussion. The development of modern additional education is connected with the comprehension of the social cooperation resource, which defines the practice of network partnership. Partnership network relationships are developing most dynamically under the condition of: a) openness of the life of the institution of additional education; b) the generated interest of institutions of additional education for partners; c) the development of “weak ties” (M. Granovetter). Conclusion. The network approach becomes a strategy of modernization and development for additional education. Under the condition of network partnership, “weak ties” of the network of additional education organizations, which provide opportunities for self-realization and displaying talent, become very important.
Keywords: additional education, social network, network approach
References:
1. Kupriyanov B. V., Kosaretskiy S. G. Obnovleniye soderzhaniya dopolnitel’nogo obrazovaniya detey: novyy etap [Updating the content of additional education of children: a new stage]. Voprosy obrazovaniya – Educational Studies Moscow, 2017, no. 2, pp. 51–58 (in Russian).
2. Romm T. A., Romm M. V. Setevyye gorizonty teorii vospitatel’nykh sistem [Network horizons of the upbringing systems theory]. Otechestvennaya i zarubezhnaya pedagogika – Domestic and Foreign Pedagogy, 2018, vol. 2, no. 4 (53), pp. 54–66 (in Russian).
3. Gusel’tseva M. S. Informatsionnaya sotsiolizatsiya v tranzitivnom obshchestve: konteksty digimodernizma [Information socialization in the transitive society: diiymodernism contexts]. Tsifrovoye obshchestvo kak kul’turno-istoricheskiy kontekst razvitiya cheloveka: sbornik nauchnykh statey i materialov mezhdunarodnoy konferentsii. Pod obshchey redaktsiyey R. V. Ershovoy [Digital society as a cultural and historical context of human development: collection of scientifi c articles and materials of the international conference. Under the general ed. of R.V. Ershova]. Кolomna, State Social and Humanitarian University Publ., 2018. Pp. 135–141 (in Russian).
4. Koroleva D. O. Vsegda onlayn: ispol’zovaniye mobil’nykh tekhnologiy i sotsial’nykh setey sovremennymi podrostkami doma i v shkole [Always online: using mobile technology and social media at home and at school by modern teenagers]. Voprosy obrazovaniya – Educational Studies Moscow, 2016, no. 1, pp. 205–224. DOI: 10.17323/1814-9545-2016-1-205-224 (in Russian).
5. Mertsalova Т. А. Informatsionnaya otkrytost’ sistemy obrazovaniya: voprosy effektivnosti gosudarstvennoy politiki [Education system openness: governmental policy effi ciency issues]. Voprosy obrazovaniya – Educational Studies Moscow, 2015, no. 2, pp. 40–75. DOI: 10.17323/1814-9545-2015-2-40-75 (in Russian).
6. Pleshakov V. A. O sotsial’nykh praktikakh zhiznedeyatel’nosti “homo cyberus” [On the social practices of life “homo cyberus”]. Izvestiya Volgogradskogo gosudarstvennogo tekhnicheskogo universiteta. Seriya: Problemy sotsial’no-gumanitarnogo znaniya – Izvestia VSTU. Series: Problems of Social and Humanitarian Knowledge, 2015, vol. 22, no. 8 (171), pp. 11–15 (in Russian).
7. Poplavskaya A. A., Gruzdev I. A., Petlin A. V. Vybor organizatsiy dopolnitel’nogo obrazovaniya detey v Rossii: k postanovke problem [Defi ning the problem of choosing extracurricular activities for children in Russia]. Voprosy obrazovaniya – Educational Studies Moscow, 2018, no. 4, pp. 261–281. DOI: 10.17323/1814-9545-2018-4-261-281 (in Russian).
8. Mal’tseva D. V. Setevoy podkhod v sotsiologii: genezis idey i primeneniye [Network approach in sociology: the genesis of ideas and application]. Novosibirsk, NSTU Publ., 2017. 220 p. (in Russian).
9. Zelenkova Т. O setevoy paradigme v psikhologii [On the network paradigm in psychology]. Metodologiya i istoriya psikhologii – Methodology and History of Psychology, 2007, vol. 2, no. 3, 18–28 (in Russian).
10. Suslov S. Istoriya stanovleniya i razvitiya setevogo analiza [History of genesis and establishment of network analysis]. Vlast’ – The Authority, 2017, vol. 25, no. 2, pp. 103–108 (in Russian).
11. Zayakina R. A., Romm M. V. Setevoy podkhod: mezhdu topologiyami prostranstva i formy [Network approach: between topologies of space and form]. Sotsiologicheskoye obozreniye – Russian Sociological Review, vol. 16, no. 2, pp. 163–79 (in Russian).
12. Crossley N., Edwards G. Cases, Mechanisms and the Real: The Theory and Methodology of Mixed-Method Social Network Analysis. Sociological Research Online, 2016, vol. 21, iss. (2), no. 13 (in Russian). URL: http://www.socresonline.org.uk/21/2/13.html (accessed 10 July 2018). DOI: 10.5153/sro.3920
13. Kadushin Ch. Understanding social networks: theories, concepts and fi ndings. NY, Oxford University Press, 2012. 264 p. (in Russian).
14. Zayakina R. A. Sinteticheskaya topologiya sotsial’nykh setey [Synthetic topology of social networks]. Novosibirsk, NSTU Publ., 2018 (in Russian).
15. Boyd D. It’s Complicated: The Social Lives of Networked Teens. New Haven, Yale University, 2014.
16. Vakhshtayn V. S. Vozvrashcheniye material’nogo. “Prostranstva”, “seti”, “potoki” v aktorno-setevoy teorii [The return of material: “spaces”, “networks”, “fl ows” in actor-network theory]. Sotsiologicheskoye obozreniye – Russian Sociological Review, 2005, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 94–115 (in Russian).
17. Khoysling R. Sotsial’nyye protsessy kak setevyye igry. Sotsiologicheskiye esse po osnovnym aspektam setevoy teorii [Social processes as online games. Sociological essays on the main aspects of network theory]. Moscow, Logos-Al’tera Publ., 2003 (in Russian).
18. Romm M. V., Romm T. A., Zayakina R. A. Partner network communities – a resource of universities’ activities, 2016. International Conference “Education Environment for the Information Age” (EEIA-2016), 2016, vol. 29, Moscow, Russia (in Russian). URL: http://www.shs-conferences.org/articles/shsconf/abs/2016/07/contents/contents.html DOI: 10.1051/shsconf/20162901058
19. Wellman B., Frank K. Network Capital in a Multi-Level World: Getting Support in Personal Communities. Social Capital: Theory and Research, ed. by Nan Lin, Karen Cook and Ronald Burt. Chicago, Aldine DeGruyter, 2001. Pp. 233–273 (in Russian).
20. Granovetter M. Sila slabykh svyazey [The strength of Weak Ties]. Ekonomicheskaya sotsiologiya – Economic Sociology, 2009, vol. 10, no. 4, pp. 31–51 (in Russian).
( 444.86 kB ) 
( 438.27 kB )
Issue: 3, 2019
Series of issue: Issue 3
Rubric: GENERAL AND ADDITIONAL EDUCATION
Pages: 35 — 41
Downloads: 787