SPECIFICITY OF SENIOR PRESCHOOLERS’ LEGAL DEVELOPMENT
DOI: 10.23951/1609-624X-2019-3-10-17
Introduction. The relevance of the article is due to a significant exacerbation of the problem of protecting the rights of children, due to the increase in cases of homelessness, violence, drug addiction, both in the family and in society as a whole. And one of the global tasks of the Russian state at the present stage is the protection of the rights of the child. The family and educational organizations have a big role in crime prevention. The purpose of the article is to identify the characteristic features of the legal development of children of senior preschool age. Material and methods. The methodological basis of our work was a cultural approach that allows us to consider the legal development of children of preschool age as an integral part of human culture and the dialectical method of cognition, involving a comprehensive analysis of the objects studied in their relationship, the definition of cause-effect relationships of the analyzed phenomena; general scientific: analysis, synthesis, induction, deduction, analogy and special methods of scientific knowledge: children’s poll “Children’s Rights”, individual conversation “What to do?” (G. Uruntaeva, Y. Afonkina), survey of educators, Pearson correlation coefficient. Results and discussion. The results of the experimental work showed that the majority of children under the age of five are at the middle and low levels of legal development. Children of senior preschool age do not fully possess the knowledge of rights and obligations that are not sufficiently complete and specific. Preschool children find it difficult to define the concepts of law, right, etc. The children of senior preschool age found it difficult to properly assess their actions and the actions of other people, sought help from an adult, followed the rules of behavior subject to adult control. As the results of the analysis of the experimental work showed, the majority of children of 5 years old are at an average (47 %) and low (45 %) levels of legal development and only 8 % of older preschool children have high rates. Statistically, this thesis was confirmed by a high value of the Pearson criterion correlation coefficient between the signs (criteria of legal development levels) (rs = 0,6). This was reflected in perceptions, behaviors, experiences, feelings of children, which in aggregate determine the formation of legal development. Сonclusion. The materials of the article can be used in the practice of pre-school educational organizations, educational activities for the preparation of bachelors and masters in pedagogical, psychological and pedagogical areas of training.
Keywords: rights, legal development, children of senior preschool age, responsibility, freedoms
References:
1. Matveyeva M. V. Prava rebenka v semeynom prave: problemy zakonodatel’stva, teorii i praktiki. Avtoref. dis. kand. yurid. nauk [Children’s rights in family law: problems of legislation, theory and practice. Abstract of thesis of cand. jurid. sci.]. Moscow, 2017. 30 p. (in Russian).
2. Artyukhova I. S. Tsennosti i vospitaniye [Values and education]. Pedagogika, 1999, no. 4, pp. 114–121 (in Russian).
3. Grozdilov S. V. Spravedlivost’ kak ob’’ekt sotsial’no-fi losofskogo issledovaniya. Avtoref. dis. kand. fi los. nauk [Justice as an object of social and philosophical research. Abstract of thesis of cand. philos. sci.]. Yaroslavl, 2013. 22 p. (in Russian).
4. Smagina L. I. Prava rebenka: teoriya i metodika [Children’s rights: theory and methods]. Minsk, Belorusskiy fond sots. podderzhki detey i podrostkov “My – detyam”, 1999. 137 p. (in Russian).
5. Mutagirov D. Z. Prava i svobody cheloveka: teoriya i praktika [Human rights and freedoms: theory and practice]. Moscow, Universitetskaya kniga Publ., 2006 (in Russian).
6. Repina O. A. Formirovaniye pravovoy kul’tury pedagogov doshkol’nogo obrazovaniya. Avtoref. dis. kand. ped. nauk [Formation of the legal culture of teachers of preschool education. Abstract of thesis of cand. ped. sci.]. Novokuznetsk, 2008. 21 p. (in Russian).
7. Ismailov N. O. Sotsial’naya spravedlivost’ kak obshchefi losofskaya kategoriya. Avtoref. dis. kand. fi los. nauk [Social justice as a general philosophical category. Abstract of thesis of cand. philos. sci.]. Moscow, 1994. 21 p. (in Russian).
8. Nepomnyashchaya N. I. Stanovleniye lichnosti rebenka 6–7 let [Formation of the personality of a 6–7-year-old child]. Moscow, Prosveshcheniye Publ., 1992. 60 p. (in Russian).
9. Pozdeyeva S. I. Otkrytoye sovmestnoye deystviye pedagoga i rebenka: soderzhaniye, priznaki, rezul’taty [Open joint programme of teacher and child: content, evidence, results]. Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo pedagogicheskogo universiteta – TSPU Bulletin, 2012, vol. 4 (119), pp. 198–202 (in Russian).
10. Tatarintseva Ye. V. Pravovoye vospitaniye (metodologiya i metodika) [Legal education (methodology and methods)]. Moscow, Vysshaya shkola Publ., 1990 (in Russian).
11. Repina T. A., Antonova T. V., Gostyukhina O. M. Deyatel’nost i vzaimootnosheniya doshkol’nikov [Activities and relationships of preschoolers]. Moscow, Pedagogika Publ., 1987. 189 p. (in Russian).
12. Fedorova I. N. Vospitaniye osnov pravovykh predstavleniy mladshikh shkol’nikov. Avtoref. dis. kand. ped. nauk [Educating the foundations of the legal ideas of younger schoolchildren. Abstract of thesis of cand. ped. sci.]. St. Petersburg, 2002. 19 p. (in Russian).
13. Gan N. Yu. Pedagogicheskiy monitoring protsessa pravovogo vospitaniya starshikh doshkol’nikov. Avtoref. dis. kand. ped. nauk [Pedagogical monitoring of the process of legal education of senior preschoolers. Abstract of thesis of cand. ped. Sci.]. Yekaterinburg, 2002. 22 p. (in Russian).
14. Prabhakar J., Skolnick D., Leslie W. A. M. The interplay between moral actions and moral judgments in children and adults. Consciousness and Cognition, 2018, vol. 63, August, pp. 183–197.
15. Fast A. A., van Reet J. Preschool children transfer real-world moral reasoning into pretense. Cognitive Development, 2018, vol. 45, January – March, pp. 40–47.
16. Shane R. Jimerson, Reza Shahroozi. Children’s rights and school psychology: Children’s right to participation, 2014, vol. 52, issue 1, February, pp. 3–12.
17. Shikako-Thomas K., Shevell M. Promoting the Human Rights of Children With Neurologic Conditions. Seminars in Pediatric Neurology, 2018, vol. 27, October, pp. 53–61.
18. Klemfuss J. Z., Ceci S. J. Legal and psychological perspectives on children’s competence to testify in co urt. Developm ental Review, 2012 , vol. 32, issue 3, September, pp. 268–286.
19. Voicu C., Anghel A., Savu-Cristescu M. Parental Education for Children?s Rights. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sc iences, 2015, vol. 191, June, pp. 1707–1712.
20. Uruntayeva G. A., Afonkina Yu. A. Praktikum po detskoy psikhologii [Workshop on child psychology]. Moscow, Prosveshcheniye Publ., 1995. 291 p. (in Russian).
( 489.34 kB ) 
( 481.81 kB )
Issue: 3, 2019
Series of issue: Issue 3
Rubric: GENERAL AND ADDITIONAL EDUCATION
Pages: 10 — 17
Downloads: 760