ON THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN TEACHING OBJECTIVES AND TEACHING RESOURCES IN THE ELECTRONIC COURSE ON EXTENSIVE AND INTENSIVE READING FOR FOREIGN STUDENTS
DOI: 10.23951/1609-624X-2019-2-82-89
The article discusses one of the most urgent applied problems of language teaching: the creation of didactic materials of a new generation based on information and communication technologies (ICT) and the Internet. First of all, we consider the already existing experience in using ICT and the Internet in education in the USA and Western Europe, where the process to introduce digital technologies in education started much earlier than in Russia. The review of experience of introducing this kind of training materials into practice provides grounds for asserting that the use of ICT and Internet technologies in developing teaching materials creates new opportunities and also new (not yet fully studied) difficulties. It is shown that the means of presenting information (and, therefore, its format) impacts the nature of information processing, assimilation and retention: digital texts are much less fully and accurately comprehended by readers than texts in the traditional format (printed on paper). This is due to the psycho-physiological and psychological mechanisms of perception and comprehension of text information given on paper and on the monitor screen. Further, processing a digital text causes the reading activity itself to be transformed. Now the complete set of reading skills, needed for in-depth processing of information, independent text analysis, is not required. Finally, the norms of organization of texts posted on the Web are changing. “Traditional” texts (including classical scientific, literary texts), constructed according to other models, cannot be fully perceived and comprehended from the monitor screen. The above-mentioned difficulties in a number of cases (for example, when teaching extensive and intensive reading) become a serious obstacle to the realization of teaching objectives. Understanding the emerging problems allows us to formulate new methodological challenges a teacher faces when preparing e-learning courses on extensive and intensive reading for foreign students, and also to suggest some practical steps aimed at solving these problems.
Keywords: electronic educational resource, information and communication technologies, Internet technologies, reading teaching, extensive and intensive reading
References:
1. Tkhostov A. Sh., Surnov K. G. Vliyaniye sovremennykh tekhnologiy na razvitiye lichnosti i formirovaniye patologicheskikh form adaptatsii: obratnaya storona sotsializatsii [Modern technologies infl uence on personality development and pathological forms of adaptation formation: the back side of civilization]. Psikhologicheskiy zhurnal – Psychological Journal, 2005, vol. 26, no. 6, pp. 16–24 (in Russian).
2. Azimov E. G., Shchukin A. N. Novyy slovar’ metodicheskikh terminov i ponyatiy (teoriya i praktika obucheniya yazykam) [New vocabulary of methodological terms and concepts (theory and practice of teaching languages)]. Moscow, Ikar Publ., 2009. 448 p. (in Russian).
3. Arutyunov A. R. Teoriya i praktika sozdaniya uchebnika russkogo yazyka dlya inostrantsev [Theory and practice of creating a Russian language textbook for foreigners]. Moscow, Russkiy yazyk Publ., 1990. 166 p. (in Russian).
4. Bauerlein M. Online Literacy is a Lesser Kind: Slow Reading Сounterbalances Web Skimming. The Chronicle of Higher Education, 2008, vol. 55, no. 4, p. B7. URL: http://chronicle.com/free/v55/i04/04b01001.htm (accessed 16 September 2017).
5. Bauerlein M. The Dumbest Generation: How the Digital Age Stupefi es Young Americans and Jeopardizes Our Future (Or, don’t Trust Anyone under 30). New York: Tarcher/Penguin Books, 2008. 264 p.
6. Greenfi eld P. M. Technology and Informal Education: What is Taught, What is Learned. Science, 2009, vol. 323, no. 5910, pp. 69–71. DOI: 10.1126/science.1167190.
7. Karr N. Pustyshka. Chto Internet delayet s nashimi mozgami [The shallows: What the Internet is doing to our brains]. Saint Petersburg, BestBusinessBooks Publ., 2012. 256 p. (in Russian).
8. Mangen A., Walgermo B. R., Brønnick K. Reading Linear Texts on Paper versus Computer Screen: Effects on Reading Comprehension. International Journal of Educational Research, 2013, vol. 58, pp. 61–68. URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2012.12.002 (accessed 16 September 2017).
9. Ackerman R. Learning on Screen versus on Paper: Which Media Enables More Effective Learning and Why? Adult Education in Israel, 2014, no. 13. URL: http://cms.education.gov.il/NR/rdonlyres/ECC22EA4-F932-420C-AA4E-CEDF2CB9002D/185085/9RakefetAckermanOnScreenversusOnPaperLearning.pdf (accessed 16 September 2017).
10. Baron N. S. Words Onscreen: The Fate of Reading in a Digital World. Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2016. 328 p.
11. Martin-Beltran M., Tigert J. M., Peerce M. M., Siverman R. D. Using Digital Texts vs. Paper Texts to Read Together: Insights into Engagement and Mediation of Literacy Practices among Linguistically Diverse Students. International Journal of Educational Research, 2017, vol. 82, pp. 135–146. URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2017.01.009 (accessed 16 September 2017).
12. Gapochka I. K. Organizatsiya uchebnogo chteniya na prodvinutom etape obucheniya studentov-inostrantsev russkomu yazyku [Organization of academic reading at an advanced level of teaching foreign students Russian language]. Russkiy yazyk za rubezhom – Russian Language Abroad, 1977, no. 5, pp. 53–56 (in Russian).
13. Gosudarstvennyy obrazovatel’nyy standart po russkomu yazyku kak inostrannomu. Vtoroy uroven’. Obshcheye vladeniye [State educational standard for Russian as a foreign language. The second level. Common profi ciency]. Moscow, Saint Petersburg, Zlatoust Publ.,1999. 40 p. (in Russian).
14. Gosudarstvennyy obrazovatel’nyy standart po russkomu yazyku kak inostrannomu. Tretiy uroven’. Obshcheye vladeniye [State educational standard for Russian as a foreign language. The third level. Common profi ciency]. Moscow, Saint Petersburg, Zlatoust Publ., 1999. 44 p. (in Russian).
15. Gosudarstvennyy obrazovatel’nyy standart po russkomu yazyku kak inostrannomu. Tretiy sertifi katsionnyy uroven’. Professional’nyy modul’ “Filologiya”: Proekt [State educational standard for Russian as a foreign language. The third level. Common profi ciency. Professional module “Philology”. Project]. Moscow, Saint Petersburg, Zlatoust Publ., 1999. 52 p. (in Russian).
16. Veyze A. A. Chteniye, referirovaniye i annotirovaniye inostrannogo teksta [Reading, abstracting and annotating foreign text]. Moscow, Vysshaya shkola Publ., 1985. 127 p. (in Russian).
17. Gapochka I. K. Tseli i soderzhaniye referativnogo vida chteniya na russkom (inostrannom) yazyke [Goals and content of extensive and intensive reading in Russian (as a foreign language)]. Prepodavaniye russkogo yazyka aspirantam-inostrantsam: sb. statey [Teaching foreign postgraduates Russian: a collection of articles]. Moscow, Nauka Publ., 1981. Pp. 28–34 (in Russian).
18. Folomkina S. K. Obucheniye chteniyu na inostrannom yazyke v neyazykovom vuze [Teaching reading in a foreign language in a non-linguistic university]. Moscow, Vysshaya shkolaPubl., 1987. 205 p. (in Russian).
19. Sosnoski James J. Hyper-Readers and Their Reading-Engines. Passions, Politics, and 21st Century Technologies. Urbana, Utah State University Press, 1999. Pp. 161–177.
20. Prensky M. Digital Natives, Digital Immigrants. Part I. On the Horizon (MCB University Press), 2001, vol. 9, no. 5, pp. 1–6. URL: https://doi.org/10.1108/10748120110424816 (accessed 16 September 2017).
21. De Stefano D., Le Fevre, J.-A. Cognitive Load in Hypertext Reading: A Review. Computers in Human Behavior, 2007, vol. 23, iss. 3, pp. 1616–1641. DOI: 10.1016/j.chb.2005.08.012.
22. Mialli D. S., Dobson T. Reading Hypertext and the Experience of Literature. Journal of Digital Information, 2001, vol. 2, no. 1. URL: https://journals.tdl.org/jodi/index.php/jodi/article/view/35/37 (accessed 16 September 2017).
Issue: 2, 2019
Series of issue: Issue 2
Rubric: INNOVATIVE PROCESSES IN EDUCATION
Pages: 82 — 89
Downloads: 842