MODERN APPROACHES TO THE ORGANIZATION OF STUDENT TRAINING IN THE UNIVERSITY
DOI: 10.23951/1609-624X-2018-8-163-168
The article analyzes the reasons for the shortage of highly-qualified specialists with high saturation of higher school graduates. The issue of the need to teach young people the ability to learn throughout their lives is dealt with. On the one hand higher education is viewed as one of the most important levels of a unified education system developing students’ thinking, and on the other - as a part of a serious business. The mechanism of interrelation of economy and production with education and science is formulated, which makes it possible to form “human capital”. The main trends of innovative activity in the university are singled out. It is emphasized that the teaching process should reflect the scientific theory on the one side, and on the other side, it should enable teaching the student to think and gain knowledge on his own. Widespread use of interpersonal communication in the group form of learning is considered by the author as one of the ways to activate students’ cognitive activity and develop their leadership qualities which are necessary for the leaders of science-driven productions. Possible approaches to the organization of students’ training in the university which can be implemented in the conditions of the new Federal State Educational Standard of Higher Education 3++ are presented. The possible variant of introduction of innovation in the system of evaluating students’ learning activity in the form of a “quality loop” is described. The need for the professional teacher training and the development of teachers of higher education is being raised.
Keywords: approaches to the organization of student training in the university, teaching the ability to learn, teaching the ability to think, quality loop
References:
1. Constructing Knowledge Societies: New Challenges for Tertiary Education, Washington DC, World Bank, 2001. (Russ. Ed.: Formirovaniye obshchestva, osnovannogo na znaniyakh. Novyye zadachi vysshey shkoly: per. s angl. Moscow, Ves’ Mir Publ., 2003, 232 p.).
2. Yushko S. V., Ivanov V. G., Kondrat’yev V. V. Kontseptsiya inzhenernogo obrazovaniya dlya neftekhimicheskogo kompleksa Rossii – put’ k universitetu novogo tipa [The concept of engineering education in Russia – the way to the universitu of the new type]. Vyssheye obrazovaniye v Rossii – Higher Education in Russia, 2017, no.11, pp. 33–42 (in Russian).
3. Sanina E. I., Makuseva T. G., Yakovleva E. V. et al. Voprosy metodologii, teorii i praktiki formirovaniya kul’tury lichnosti obuchayushchikhsya v kontekste sistemno-deyatel’nostnogo podkhoda k obucheniyu [Questions of methodology, theory and practice of forming a culture of personality of students in the context of the system-activity approach to learning]. Saint Petersburg, Svoyo izdatel’stvo Publ., 2015. 248 p. (in Russian).
4. Dutkevich P. Nuzhny li reformy v sisteme vysshego obrazovaniya? [Are the reforms of higher education in Russia necessary?]. Vyssheye obrazovaniye v Rossii – Higher Education in Russia, 2015, no. 3, pp. 80–84 (in Russian).
5. Bagdasar’yan N. G. Inzhenernoye obrazovaniye: mezhdu missiyey i standartom [Engineering education: between mission and standard]. Vyssheye obrazovaniye v Rossii – Higher Education in Russia, 2015, no. 4, pp. 34–43 (in Russian).
6. Shukshunov V. Ye. Problemy innovatsionnogo puti razvitiya ekonomiki i rol’ universitetov v yeye reshenii [Problems of the innovative way of economic development and the role of universities in solving it]. Obrazovaniye dlya ustoychivogo razvitiya: na puti k obshchestvy znaniy: materialy Mezhdunarodnogo foruma. Minsk, Respublika Belarus’ [Education for sustainable development: towards a knowledge society: materials of the International forum. Minsk, Republic of Belarus]. Minsk, BSU Publ., 2005. Pp. 78–87 (in Russian).
7. Semonov G. V., Lushnikova G. A. Sotsial’no-pedagogicheskiye oriyentiry v realizatsii obrazovatel’noy politiki vysshey tekhnicheskoy shkoly [Socio-pedagogical guidelines in the implementation of the educational policy of the higher technical school]. Materialy Mezhdunarodnoy nauchno-prakticheskoy internet-konferentsii “Mnogourovnevoye obrazovaniye kak prostranstvo professional’no-lichnostnogo stanovleniya vypusknika vuza”. V 2 chastyakh. Ch. 1 [Materials of scientific practical Internet-conference “Multi-level education as a space for professional and personal formation of a graduate of a university. In 2 parts, Part 1]. Rostov-on-Don, SFedU Publ., 2007. Pp. 56–61 (in Russian).
8. Yakovleva E. V. Samostoyatel’naya upravlyayemaya rabota studentov kak effektivnoye sredstvo professionanoy podgotovki [Independent selfmanaged work of students as an effective means of training]. V mire nauchnykh otkrytiy. Sotsialno-gumanitarnyye nauki – In the World of Scientific Discoveries. Humanities and Social Sciences, 2015, no. 7.4 (67), pp. 1429–1440 (in Russian).
9. Yakovleva E. V. Gipoteza i yeye rol’ v formirovanii myshleniya studentov [Hypothesis and its role in the formation of students’ thinking]. Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo pedagogicheskogo universiteta – TSPU Bulletin, 2016, vol. 9, no. 174, pp. 117–124 (in Russian).
10. Yakovleva E. V. Zadachi-otsenki kak sredstvo formirovaniya myshleniya na uchebnykh zanyatiyakh po fizike [Tasks-assessments as a means of forming thinking in physics classes]. Vestnik Kazanskogo tekhnologicheskogo universiteta – Herald of Kazan Technological University, 2013, vol. 16, no. 12, pp. 358–360 (in Russian).
11. Kondrat’yev V. V., Ivanov V. G. Podgotovka prepodavateley k obucheniyu budushchikh inzhenerov na osnove mezhdistsiplinarnogo podkhoda [Teacher training for future engineers on the basis of an interdisciplinary approach]. Inzhenernoye obrazovaniye: zhurnal AIOR – Engineering Education: Association for Engineering Education of Russia, 2016, no. 20, рp. 189–196 (in Russian).
( 1.01 MB ) 
( 377.95 kB )
Issue: 8, 2018
Series of issue: Issue 3
Rubric: PROBLEMS OF TEACHER TRAINING
Pages: 163 — 168
Downloads: 925