ACTUALIZATION OF THE INTERDISCOURSE CATEGORY IN THE SCIENTIFIC MEDICAL DISCOURSE
DOI: 10.23951/1609-624X-2018-7-19-24
The article deals with the question of representation of the interdiscourse category in the scientific medical discourse. It provides the differentiation of the notions “intertextuality” and “interdiscursivity” and gives parameters of their differentiation. In case of intertextuality the sings are linguistic units that indicate the interaction between texts, in case of interdiscursivity the indications are the elements of conceptual and linguistic plan of the discourse. The article shows the interaction between intertextuality and interdiscursivity in the scientific medical discourse. Intertextuality depends on interdiscursivity and marks it with the help of different linguistic means. In the scientific medical discourse marked and unmarked forms represent interdiscursive connections. The article presents the examples of realization of interdiscursive connections in the scientific medical discourse. It concludes that interdiscursivity in the scientific medical discourse is a cognitive and a discursive phenomenon. The cognitive side of interdiscursivity reflects the possibility to gain and organize medical knowledge; the discursive one is connected with the extension of knowledge in the text that allows considering the acquired knowledge and experience. The category of interdiscourse is actualized by the inclusion of fragments of knowledge in this type of text that have textual and nontextual etymology and which relate to other discourses.
Keywords: interdiscourse, interdiscursivity, intertextuality, precedent phenomenon, medical discourse
References:
1. Sériot P. Analiz diskursa vo Frantsuzskoy shkole (diskurs i interdiskurs) [The French school of discourse analysis (discourse and interdiscourse)]. Semiotika: Antologiya. Sost. Yu. S. Stepanov [Semiotics: Anthology. Compiled by Yu.S. Stepanov]. Moscow, Akademicheskiy prospect Publ.; Ekaterinburg, Delovaya kniga Publ., 2001. Pp. 549–562 (in Russian).
2. Pếcheux M. Les vérités de la Palice: linguistique, sémantique, philosophie. Paris: F. Maspero, 1975. 279 p. (Russ. ed.: Peshyo M. Propisnye istiny. Lingvistika, semantika, fi losofi ya. Kvadratura smysla: Francuzskaya shkola analiza diskursa: per. s fr. i port. Moscow, Progress Publ., 1999. pp. 225–290).
3. Rudnev Yu. Kontseptsiya diskursa kak elementa literaturovedcheskogo metayazyka [Concept of discourse as an element of literature metalanguage] (in Russian). URL: http://zhelty-dom.narod.ru/literature/txt/discours_jr.htm (accessed 15 March 2018).
4. Chernyavskaya V. E. Nauchnyy diskurs: Vydvizheniye rezul’tata kak kommunikativnaya i yazykovaya problema [Scientifi c discourse: Nomination of the result as a communicative and language problem]. Moscow, Lenand Publ., 2017. 144 p. (in Russian).
5. Alekseeva L. M., Mishlanova S. L. Meditsinskiy diskurs: teoreticheskiye osnovy i printsipy analiza [Medical discourse: theoretical bases and principles of analysis]. Perm, Perm University Publ., 2002. 200 p. (in Russian).
6. Mishlanova S. L. Metafora v meditsinskom diskurse [Metaphor in the medical discourse]. Perm, Perm State University Publ., 2002. 160 p. (in Russian).
7. Barsukova M. I. Meditsinskiy diskurs: strategii i taktiki rechevogo povedeniya vracha. Avtoref. dis. kand. fi lol. nauk [Medical discourse: strategies and tactics of a doctor’s communication behavior. Abstract of thesis cand. of philol. sci.]. Saratov, 2007. 21 p. (in Russian).
8. Marillaud P., Gautier R. L’intertextualité. Actes du 24e Colloque d’Albi langages et signifi cations. Toulouse-le Mirail: CALS/CPST, 2004. Pp. 333–343.
9. Arkhipov I. K. Yazyk i yazykovaya lichnst’: ucheb. posobiye [Language and a linguistic personality: textbook]. Saint Petersburg, Knizhnyy dom Publ., 2008 (in Russian).
10. Chernyavskaya V. E. Otkrytyy tekst i otkrytyy diskurs: intertekstual’nost’-diskursivnost’-interdiskursivnost’ [Opened text and opened discourse: intertextuality – discursivity – interdiscursivity]. Stil-6. Belgrad, 2007. Pp. 11–26 (in Russian).
11. Beloglazova E. V. Polidiskursivnost’ kak osobyy issledovatel’skiy focus [Polydiscursivity as a special research focus]. Izvestiya Sankt-Peterburgskogo universiteta ekonomiki i fi nansov – Proceedings of Saint-Petersburg University of Economics and Finance, 2009, no. 3, pp. 66–71 (in Russian).
12. Chernyavskaya V. E. Interpretatsiya nauchnogo teksta [Interpretation of a scientifi c text]. Saint Petersburg, Nauka Publ., 2004. 127 p. (in Russian).
13. Degaud M. and Sujobert P. When it rains, it pours. Blood, 2018, vol. 131, no. 7, pp. 836–837. DOI: 10.1182/blood-2017-10-814087.
14. Oladele R. O., Bongomin F., Gago S., Denning D. W. HIV-Associated Cryptococcal Disease in Resource-Limited Settings: A Case for “Prevention Is Better Than Cure”? Fungi, 2017, vol. 3, no. 4, pp. 1–18. DOI: 10.3390/jof3040067
15. Fiona Godlee. What we must learn from the USA opioid epidemic. BMJ, 2017. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.j4828
16. Garcia-Bennett A., Nees M., Fadeel B. In search of the holy grail: folate-targeted nanoparticles for cancer therapy. Biochem. Pharmacol, 2011, vol. 81, no. 8, pp. 976–984.
17. Neville W. Goodman. From Shakespeare to Star Trek and beyond: a Medline search for literary and other allusions in biomedical titles. BMJ, 2005. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.331.7531.1540.
18. Srinivasan R., & Rose G. D. Methinks it is like a folding curve. Biophysical Chemistry, 2002, vol. 101–102, pp. 167–171. DOI: 10.1016/S0301-4622(02)00147-3
19. Appelman H. D., McKenna B. J. A ‘rose is a rose is a rose is a rose,’ but exactly what is a gastric adenocarcinoma? Journal of Surgical Oncology, 1998, vol. 68, no. 3, pp. 141–143.
20. Naves L. B., Dhand C., Venugopal J. R., Rajamani L., Ramakrishna S., Almeida L. Nanotechnology for the treatment of melanoma skin cancer. Prog. Biomater, 2017, vol. 6, pp. 13–26. DOI: 10.1007/s40204-017-0064-z
21. Fernàndez-Busquets X. Toy kit against malaria: magic bullets, LEGO, Trojan horses and Russian dolls. Therapeutic Delivery, 2014, vol. 5, no.10, pp. 1049–1052.
( 451.79 kB ) 
( 445.34 kB )
Issue: 7, 2018
Series of issue: Issue 7
Rubric: TOPICAL ISSUES OF COGNITIVE-DISCURSIVE LINGUISTICS AND TEXT LINGUISTICS
Pages: 19 — 24
Downloads: 802