THE SPEECH VERBS SEMANTICS ORGANIZATION IN THE RUSSIAN DIALECTS OF BAIKAL REGION
DOI: 10.23951/1609-624X-2018-6-9-15
The article contains a fragment of the analysis of the semantics of the derivatives of dialect verbs of speech with the aim of studying the pragmatic aspects of linguistic meaning. Classification of dialectal verbs is carried out in accordance with the classification of lexico-semantic groups of commonly used Russian verbs. Cognitive models are defined in the formation of characterizing actions associated with speech activity. Examples of propositions of verbs are given. It is established that characterizing verbs of this group can have mono- and polypropositive structures. It turned out that for the nomination of situations related to the speech activity of people, the subject of the proposition is relevant. It was determined that one of the propositions of the verbs can reflect the objective properties of the named action, the other can be the result of evaluating these properties. It turned out that the evaluation is contained in the derived verbs formed from the estimated nouns or arises in the process of word formation on the basis of the metaphor. Actual for carriers of dialects are LSG verbs of verbal communication and LSG verbs of speech influence. Dialectal verbs usually reflect a conflict situation. To form these verbs, metaphorical models are used, complicated by the Fictitious modality and the emotional modality. Emotional assessment is able to influence the interlocutor. The presence of metaphorical names is explained by the anthropocentricity of the group and the special discourse. It turned out that for the speakers, the dialect is characterized by a negative attitude toward meaningless, unproductive, verbose arguments; to the moral discredit of the interlocutor (semes “scold”, “gossip”). Such qualities as intelligence, ability to convey information in a clear and accessible form are valued.
Keywords: proposition, semantics, speech activity, derived word, dialectal vocabulary, metaphorical model, evaluative vocabulary, subjective modality, idiomaticity
References:
1. Gumbol’d V. Yazyk i filosofiya kul’tury [The language and philosophy of culture]. Moscow, Progress Publ., 1985. 448 p. (in Russian).
2. Zolotareva N. V. Semanticheskoye prostranstvo glagolov rechevoy deyatel’nosti v russkom i angliyskom yazykakh. Avtoref. dis. kand. fi lol. nauk [The semantic space of verbs of speech activity in Russian and English languages: the cognitive aspect. Avtoref. diss. cand. philol. sci.]. Ekaterinburg, 1999. 22 p. (in Russian).
3. Psikhologiya. Slovar’ [Psychology. Dictionary]. Moscow, Politizdat Publ., 1990. 494 p. (in Russian).
4. Matveeva T. V. (ed.) Leksiko-semanticheskiye gruppy russkikh glagolov: uchebnyy slovar’-spravochnik [Lexico-semantic groups of Russian verbs: educational dictionary-reference]. Sverdlovsk, UrSU Publ., 1988. 154 p. (in Russian).
5. Lopatin V. V. Otsenka kak sub’’ekt grammatiki [Assessment as the subject of grammar]. Russkiy yazyk: problemy grammaticheskoy semantiki i otsenochnye faktory v yazyke [The Russian language: problems of grammatical semantics and evaluative factors in the language]. Moscow, V. V. Vinogradov Russian Language Institute of the Russian Academy of Sciences Publ., 1992. Pp. 70–75 (in Russian).
6. Lingvisticheskiy entsiklopedicheskiy slovar’ [Linguistic encyclopedic dictionary]. Moscow, Sov. Entsiklopediya Publ., 1990. 685 p. (in Russian).
7. Teliya V. N. Russkaya frazeologiya. Semanticheskiy, pragmaticheskiy i lingvokul’turologicheskiy aspekty [Russian phraseology. Semantic, pragmatic and linguocultural aspects]. Moscow, Shkola “Yazyki russkoy kul’tury” Publ., 1996. 288 p. (in Russian).
8. Arutyunova N. D. Tipy yazykovykh znacheniy. Otsenka. Sobytiye. Fakt [Types of language meanings. Assessment. Event. Fact]. Moscow, Nauka Publ., 1988. 341 p. (in Russian).
9. Artem’yeva O. V. Otsubstantivnyye glagoly v govorakh Pribaykal’ya i Irkutskoy oblasti: kognitivnyy aspekt. Avtoref. dis. kand. fi lol. nauk [Denominative verbs in the dialects of the Baikal region and the Irkutsk region: the cognitive aspect. Abstract of thesis of cand. philol. sci.] Tomsk, 2000. 22 p. (in Russian).
10. Ermolaeva I. A. Semanticheskaya klassifi katsiya glagolov rechi v russkom yazyke [Semantic Сlassifi cation of the Russian Speech Act Verbs]. Vestnik SPbGU. Yazyk i literatura – Vestnik SpbSU. Language and Literature, 2017, vol. 14, issue 3, pp. 362–375 (in Russian).
11. Bessonova Yu. A. Semantika dialektnyh glagolov rechi v orlovskikh govorakh i otrazheniye v ney mirovospriyatiya ikh nositeley. Avtoref. dis. kand. fi lol. nauk [Dialectal semantics of verbs of speech in Oryol dialects and perception of their carriers refl ected in it. Abstract of thesis of cand. philol. sci.]. Orel, 2001. 24 p. (in Russian).
12. Krylova T. V. Gore ot uma: otsenka uma v russkoy yazykovoy kartine mira [Woe from wit: evaluation of the mind in the Russian language picture of the world]. Voprosy Jazykoznaniya, 2017, no. 4, pp. 33–51 (in Russian).
( 461.29 kB ) 
( 454.38 kB )
Issue: 6, 2018
Series of issue: Issue 6
Rubric: TOPICAL ISSUES OF RUSSIAN STUDIES
Pages: 9 — 15
Downloads: 823