EXPERIENCE OF LINGUISTIC AND LEGAL PERSONALITY CHARACTERISTICS OF CONFLICT LANGUAGE PERSONALITY (ON THE EXAMPLE OF ANALYSIS OF COMMUNICATIVE BEHAVIOR OF TROLL IN THE NETWORK CORRESPONDENCE)
DOI: 10.23951/1609-624X-2018-2-127-142
In today’s social interaction it is widely represented the sphere of conflict communication, which is a reflection of the existence in the society of a stable tendency to understanding the aggression as the permissible norms of hostile demonstrations, potentially punishable act inappropriately interpreted the notions of freedom and personal responsibility. Careful attention of scientists focused on the study of network communication in various forms of embodiment of its genre, in particular, - the correspondence of many social network users. The article presents an analysis of the characteristics of communicative behavior of linguistic identity focused on the implementation of hostile manipulative strategies in relation to others in the network correspondence. Such linguistic identity is defined as the conflict on the basis of a number of parameters, of which the key factor is in favor of communicative intention. In particular, it comes to speech and means to achieve them in a communicative activity of a troll as a carrier of the type of conflict. The essence of trolling - communicative actions of a troll - consists in placing provocative messages on the network in order to create conflict situations. Trolling can have different manifestations, from a «harmless» for the participants in the communication of a verbal clash about certain events and / or individuals, to «hard» forms associated with causing moral harm to the interaction of participants. A motivating base of actions in the network can be the troll’s desire for emotional satisfaction from spilling out negative emotions against other communicators, aggressive and hostile manipulations, shocks. Troll promotes creation of provocation incitement in the communicative field by moving from discussion of social issues to personality of interaction participants. Such course of action, of course, entails a response. Troll can be seen in groups, discussing a variety of topics and issues and contemporary life. However, this discussion speaks only about the reason for a troll to «catch» and then, from the replica to the replica to deploy negative-emotional «onslaught» on the interlocutors. A natural result of becoming a failure in communication or its complete cessation. The specificity of the troll’s network behavior allows us to talk about its potential responsibility in the field of ethical and legal relations. This is facilitated by the factors: firstly, the deployment of manipulative trolling actions for specific network participants’ correspondence; secondly, active use in speech of stylistically reduced and obscene words, performing the function of invective. Given the above, it can be argued that the 6l.
Keywords: linguistic personality of conflict type, electronic genre, electronic epistolary text, network correspondence, troll, trolling, verbal aggression
References:
1. Kuryanovich A. V. Elektronnoye pis’mo kak funktsional’no-stilevaya raznovidnost’ epistolyarnogo zhanra v prostranstve sovremennoy kommunikatsii [The e-mail as a functional and stylistic variety of the epistolary genre in the space of modern communication]. Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo pedagogicheskogo universiteta – TSPU Bulletin, 2008, no. 2 (76), pp. 44–50 (in Russian).
2. Kuryanovich A. V. Invektivnye rechevye zhanry v prostranstve sovremennoy mezhlichnostnoy kommunikatsii [Invective speech genres in the space of contemporary interpersonal communication]. Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo pedagogicheskogo universiteta – TSPU Bulletin, 2005, no. 3 (47), рp. 106–112 (in Russian).
3. Ugolovnyy kodeks Rossiyskoy Federatsii. Poslednyaya deystvuyushchaya redaktsiya s kommentariyami [The Criminal Code of the Russian Federation (the Criminal Code). Last current version with commentary] (in Russian). URL: http://stykrf.ru/128-1 (accessed 21 November 2017).
4. Kodeks ob administrativnykh pravonarusheniyakh Rossiyskoy Federatsii [Code of Administrative Offences of the Russian Federation (the Administrative Code)] (in Russian). URL: https://rucodex.org/koap/glava-5/st-5.61.html (accessed 21 November 2017).
5. Vorontsova T. A. Trolling i fleyming: rechevaya agressiya v internet-kommunikatsii [Trolling and flaming: vspeech aggression in Internet communication]. Vestnik Udmurtskogo universiteta. Seriya 109. Istoriya i filologiya – Bulletin of Udmurt University. Series History and Philolgy, 2016, no. 2, рp. 109–116 (in Russian).
6. Lutovinova O. V. Yazykovaya lichnost’ v virtual’nom diskurse. Аvtoref. dis. dokt. filol. nauk [Language personality in virtual discourse. Аbstract of thesis doct. of philol. sci.]. Volgograd, 2013. 42 p. (in Russian).
7. Galichkina E. N. Komp’uternaya kommunikatsiya: lingvisticheskiy status, znakovye sredstva, zhanrovoye prostranstvo. Avtoref. dis. dokt. filol. nauk [Computer communication: linguistic status, symbolic means, genre space. Аbstract thesis of doct. of philol. sci.]. Volgograd, 2012. 38 p. (in Russian).
8. Novokshonov D. E. Trolling: strategiya diskreditatsii & diskreditatsiya strategiy [Trolling: a strategy of discrediting & discrediting strategies]. Rechevaya kommunikatsiya v sredstvakh massovoy informatsii: materialy II Mezhdunarodnogo nauchno-prakticheskogo seminara. Pod red. V. V. Vasil’evoy, V. I. Kon’kova [Speech communication in the media: Proceedings of the II International Scientific and Practical Seminar. Edited by V. V. Vasilyeva, V. I. Konkova]. Saint Petersburg, St. Petersburg University Publ., 2013, рp. 224–227 (in Russian).
9. Yakovlyuk A. A. Sotsiolingvisticheskiye aspekty i osobennosti vyrazheniya agressii v internete [Sociolinguistic aspects and features of aggression expression in the internet]. Vestnik Bashkirskogo universiteta – Bulletin of Bashkir University, 2014, no. 3, рp. 978–981 (in Russian).
10. Stroitelev N. M. Trolling kak raznovidnost’ provokatsionnogo rechevogo povedeniya (na materialakh angloyazychnykh IRC-chatov) [Trolling as a type of the provocative verbal behavior (on materials of English IRC-chats)]. Uchenye zametki TOGU – Scientists notes PNU, 2013, vol. 4, рp. 663–668 (in Russian).
11. Rezanova Z. I., Ivantsova E. V. Lingvopersonologiya: tipy yazykovykh lichnostey i lichnostno orientirivannoye obucheniye. Pod red. N. D. Goleva, N. V. Saykovoy, E. P. Khomich. Barnaul; Kemerovo: BGPU, 2006. 435 s. (retsenziya) [Lingvopersonology: types of linguistic persons and personoriented education. Ed. N. D. Golev, N. V. Saykova, E. P. Khomich. Barnaul; Kemerovo: BGPU Publ., 2006. 435 p. (review)]. Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Filologiya – Tomsk State University Journal of Philology, 2009, no. 2 (6), рp. 127–130 (in Russian).
12. Ivantsova E. V. Problemy formirovaniya metodologicheskikh osnov lingvopersonologii [Problems of forming methodology bases of linguoperersonology]. Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Filologiya – Tomsk State University Journal of Philology, 2008, no. 3 (4), рp. 27–43 (in Russian).
13. Akulich M. M. Internet-trolling: ponyatiye, soderzhaniye i formy [Internet trolling: concept, content and form]. Vestnik Tyumenskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Sotsial’no-ekonomicheskiye i pravovye issledovaniya – Tyumen State University Herald. Social, Economic and Law Research, 2012, no. 8, рp. 47–54 (in Russian).
14. Vnebrachnykh R. A. Trolling kak forma sotsial’noy agressii v virtual’nykh soobshchestvakh [Trolling as a form of social aggression in virtual communities]. Vestnik Udmurtskogo universiteta. Seriya Filosofiya. Psikhologiya. Pedagogika – Bulletin of Udmurt University. Series “Philosophy. Psychology. Pedagogy”, 2012, no. 3-1, рp. 36–39 (in Russian).
15. Ponyatiya chesti, dostoinstva i delovoy reputatsii: Spornye teksty SMI i problemy ikh analiza i otsenki yuristami i lingvistami. Izd. 2-e, pererab. i dop. Pod red. A. K. Simonova i M. V. Gorbanevskogo [Concepts of honor, dignity and business reputation: Controversial media texts and the problems of their analysis and evaluation by lawyers and linguists. Edition 2-nd, revised and enlarged. Edited by A. K. Simonova and M. V. Gorbanevsky]. Moscow, Medeya Publ., 2004. 328 p. (in Russian).
16. Besplatnaya pochtovaya sluzhba “Rambler pochta” [Free email service Rambler Mail] (in Russian). URL: https://mail.rambler.ru/#/folder/Spam/3177/ (accessed 21 March 2017).
17. Sotsial’naya set’ Facebook [Facebook social network] (in Russian). URL: https://www.facebook.com/ (accessed 21 March 2017).
18. Mursalieva G. Gruppy smerti. Novaya gazeta. 16.05.2016 [Groups of Death. Novaya Gazeta] (in Russian). URL: https://www.novayagazeta.ru/articles/016/05/16/68604-gruppy-smerti-18 (accessed 21 March 2017).
19. Telekanal “Dozhd’” [TV channel Rain] (in Russian). URL: https://tvrain.ru/news/putin-427130/?utm_source=facebook&utm_medium=social&utm_campaign=eto-sluchilos (accessed 21 March 2017).
20. Dement’ev O. M., Dubrovina M.M. Internet-trolling - shalost’, pravonarusheniye ili prestupleniye? [Internet trolling - prank, offense or crime?]. Science Time, 2015, no. 10 (22), рp. 80–86 (in Russian).
21. Galaktionova I. V., Kobozeva I. M., Kolomiytseva T. V. i dr. Sudebnaya lingvisticheskaya ekspertiza [Forensic linguistic expertise]. Byulleten’ Ministerstva yustitsii Rossiyskoy Federatsii, 2003, no 9. рp. 63–70 (in Russian).
( 557.09 kB ) 
( 541.27 kB )
Issue: 2, 2018
Series of issue: Issue 2
Rubric: TOPICAL ISSUES OF COGNITIVE-DISCURSIVE LINGUISTICS, CULTURAL LINGUISTICS AND INTER-CULTURAL COMMUNICATION
Pages: 127 — 142
Downloads: 930