COGNITIVE AND COMMUNICATIVE PECULIARITIES OF RELIGIOUS SUBJECTS DISCOURSE FRAGMENTS IN DIALECT SPEAKERS’ DISCOURSE
DOI: 10.23951/1609-624X-2018-2-19-26
Study of traditional consciousness and peculiarities of popular culture bearers’ worldview on the material of textual dialect speech corpora is an urgent task of linguistic culturology and cognitive linguistics. Representative textual collections of everyday dialect speech only recently became a source of reconstruction of traditional worldview. The purpose of this work is a study of religious knowledge and ideas role and content in the worldview of dialect speakers. The analysis of religious subjects discourse fragments, picked out of a general speech flow, has shown that the religious component is a significant part of a general world picture and of popular culture bearers’ linguistic consciousness. Reflections on God, Christian saints, orthodox holidays and memorable dates of Church calendar, church services and rituals, religious writings, religious figures, trends and heterodox people, plots of Christian mythology occupy an important place in dialect speakers’ narratives. The notions of religious sphere often become the objects of dialect speakers’ reflection in their conversations with dialectologists. The religious subjects discourse fragments often contain such means expressing reflection as explanatory constructions, repetitions, periphrasis, generalizing (often evaluative) remarks, addresses to interlocutors with the purpose of checking up the degree of speech understanding, rhetoric questions. The communicative peculiarities of religious thematic fragments – increased metalinguistic reflection against a background of a feeble, in general, speech awareness of popular speech culture bearers – show that the elements of religious worldview are an important constituent part of dialect speakers’ cultural identity, occupying a central place in the popular tradition bearers’ value system.
Keywords: traditional popular culture, dialect, world picture, language consciousness, metalinguistic reflection
References:
1. Tarasov E. F. Obraz Rossii: metodologiya issledovaniya [The Image of Russia: Research Methodology]. Voprosy psikholingvistiki – Issues of Psycholinguistics, 2006, no. 4, pp. 69–73 (in Russian).
2. Mashchenko S. P. Didakticheskiy potentsial «narodnogo pravoslaviya» v obuchenii russkomu yazyku kak inostrannomu [Didactic Potential of “Popular Orthodoxy” in Teaching Russian as a Foreign Language]. Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo pedagogicheskogo universiteta – Tomsk State Pedagogical University Bulletin, 2005, no. 3 (47), pp. 90–95 (in Russian).
3. Kryuchkova O. Yu. Dialektologicheskiy korpus kak istochnik lingvokul’turologicheskogo izucheniya russkikh narodnykh govorov [Dialect Corpus as a Source of Russian Dialects Linguistic and Cultural Study]. Slavyanskiy al’manakh 2009 [Slavic Almanac 2009]. Moscow, 2010, pp. 67–84 (in Russian).
4. Bystrov S. I. Pomorskoye soglasiye v Saratovskom krae so vtoroy poloviny XVII stoletiya do 80-kh gg. XIX veka. Opyt istoricheskogo issledovaniya [The “Consent of Pomorye” in Saratov Region (From the Second Half of the 17 cent. till the 80-s of the 19 cent.). An Essay of Historical Study]. Saratov, 1923. 26 p. (in Russian).
5. Istoriya s. Samodurovki po vospominaniyam E. I. Kruglova. Dooktyabr’skiy period (aprel’ 1963 g.) [History of village Samodurovka in memoirs of E. I. Kruglov. A Period before October (April 1963)]. Material iz fonda Vol’skogo kraevedcheskogo muzeya [Material from the Funds of Vol’sk Reginal Museum]. F. 4. D. 233. pp. 1–6 (in Russian).
6. Bibikova M. Yu. Staroobryadchestvo g. Vol’ska i Vol’skogo uezda XVII – XIX vekov [Old Belief of Vol’sk City and Vol’skiy District (Uyezd) in 17-19 cent.]. Saratovskoye Povolzh’e v panorame vekov: istoriya, traditsii, problemy [Volga Region around Saratov through the Centuries: History, Traditions, Problems]. Saratov, 2000, pp. 186–189 (in Russian).
7. Buranova A. I. Tematicheskaya organizatsiya dialektnoy rechi: kvantitativnyy analiz [Dialect Speech Thematic Organization: The Quantitative Analysis]. Izvestiya Saratovskogo universiteta – Izvestiya of Saratov University, 2012, vol. 12, issue 3, pp. 35–38 (in Russian).
8. Nikitina S. E. Ustnaya narodnaya kul’tura i yazykovoye soznaniye [Oral Popular Culture and Language Consciousness]. Moscow, 2014. 192 p. (in Russian).
9. Nikitina S. E. Staroobryadchestvo kak konfessional’naya kul’tura: vzglyad etnolingvista [Old Belief as a Confessional Culture: The View of Ethnolinguist]. Istoriya i geografiya russkikh staroobryadcheskikh govorov [History and Geography of Russian Old Believers’ Dialects]. Moscow, 1995, pp. 84–92 (in Russian).
10. Kratkaya entsiklopediya slavyanskoy mifologii [A Brief Encyclopedia of Slavic Mythology] (in Russian). URL: http://sueverija.narod.ru/Prazdnic/Apr/23Yrii.htm#Краткая_энциклопедия_славянской_мифологии_. (Accessed 7 December 2017).
11. Gol’din V. E., Kryuchkova O. Yu. Russkaya dialektologiya. Kommunikativnyy, kognitivnyy i lingvokul’turnyy aspekty [Russian Dialectology. Communicative, Cognitive, Linguistic and Cultural Aspects]. Saratov, 2010. 120 p. (in Russian).
12. Kryuchkova O. Yu. Metayazykovaya i metakommunikativnaya refleksiya kak rezul’tat sotsial’no-kul’turnykh razlichiy mezhdu kommunikantami (na materiale russkoy dialektnoy rechi) [Metalinguistic and Metacommunicative Reflection as a Result of Social and Cultural Differences between Communicants (on the Material of Russian Dialect Speech)]. Russkiy yazyk segodnya. Vyp. 5: Problemy rechevogo obshcheniya [The Russian Language Today. Issue 5: Problems of Verbal Communication]. Moscow, 2012, pp. 259–268 (in Russian).
( 456.71 kB ) 
( 447.41 kB )
Issue: 2, 2018
Series of issue: Issue 2
Rubric: TOPICAL ISSUES OF THE RUSSIAN STUDIES
Pages: 19 — 26
Downloads: 722