FEATURES OF DEVELOPMENT OF STUDENT’S REFLECTIVE COGNITIVE ACTIVITY IN THE LEARNING PROCESS
DOI: 10.23951/1609-624X-2017-4-71-76
Russian society is in need of the people that quickly adapt to the changing world, are capable for continuous selfeducation and self-improvement. Therefore, the quality of subjectivity becomes the leitmotif of the educational process at the university. The fullest development of this quality can be the result of reflexive cognitive activity. The article offeres an idea of level representation of cognitive educational activity of the student: operational activity - cognitive activity – reflexive activity – individual activity. It is based on the transition of the subject from one mode of interaction with the text of the cultural reality to another. Reflection is the basis, the means and the result of cognitive activity of the student. One important feature of the construction of the educational process with regard to the level structure is a non-technological approach to it. Educational practice is the practice of creative interaction with the student, which gives rise to his own mechanisms of interaction with the culture of the text. Educational practices let you organize the interaction with the student taking into account his subjective capabilities.
Keywords: personality, educational event, reflection, subject, subjectivity, cognitive activity
References:
1. Luksha P. S., Sigova S. V., Serebryakov A. G. Formirovaniye perechnya vostrebovannykh kompetentsiy: pervyy opyt Rossii [Formation of the list of required competencies: fi rst experience of Russia]. Nepreryvnoye obrazovaniye: XXI vek – Continuing education: XXI century, 2013, vol. 1, no. 1 (1), pp. 61–71 (in Russian).
2. Zvenigorodskaya G. P. Fenomenologicheskaya pedagogika [Phenomenological Pedagogy]. Khabarovsk, FESHU Publ., 2013. 179 p. (in Russian).
3. Stepashko L. A. Filosofi ya obrazovaniya: ontologicheskiy aspect [Philosophy of education: ontological aspect]. Khabarovsk, KhSPU Publ., 2002. 71 p. (in Russian).
4. Bogin G. I. Obreteniye sposobnosti ponimat’: vvedeniye v fi lologicheskuyu germenevtiku [Finding the ability to understand: Introduction to philological hermeneutics]. Tver, 2001 (in Russian). URL: http://www.bim-bad.ru/docs/bogin_ponimanije.pdf (accessed 27.01.2017).
5. Kraevskiy V. V. Osnovy obucheniya. Didaktika i metodika: ucheb. posobiye [Basic teachings. Didactics and methodology: teaching guide]. Moscow, Akademiya Publ., 2008. 352 p. (in Russian).
6. Lobok A. M. Veroyatnostnyy mir [Probabilistic world] (in Russian). URL: http://allobok.ru/?page_id=10 (accessed 27.01.2017).
7. Novikova G. P. Faktory gotovnosti organizatsiy doshkol’nogo obrazovaniya k vvedeniyu FGOS [Factors of readiness of organizations of preschool education for the introduction of FSES]. Pedagogika – Pedagogy, 2016, no. 2, pp. 13–20 (in Russian).
8. Vygotskiy L. S. Myshleniye i rech’ [Thinking and speech]. Moscow, Labirint Publ., 1999. 352 p. (accessed 27.01.2017) (in Russian).
9. Levites D. G. Lichnost’ i tehnologii v obrazovanii [Personality and technologies in education]. Pedagogika – Pedagogy, 2016, no. 2, pp.34–39 (in Russian).
Issue: 4, 2017
Series of issue: Issue 4
Rubric: ISSUES OF NATURAL-SCIENTIFIC EDUCATION
Pages: 71 — 76
Downloads: 844