STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS OF THE TOPONYMY OF THE CRIMEA
DOI: 10.23951/1609-624X-2017-3-88-93
This paper presents a study of the toponyms of the Crimea as an object of non-material heritage forming the historical and linguistic space of the peninsula, complements the existing information on the classification of toponyms with new data. Modern toponymics is characterized by the intensive growth of those subject areas and research directions that have an interdisciplinary character. Toponymic research integrating linguistics, geography, history, sociology, cartography, etc. should be referred to such interdisciplinary directions of the onymic science. The aim of the research is finding peculiarities of morphological and non-morphological ways of word formation in the toponymy of the Russian Federation on the example of the Republic of Crimea. In this regard, there has been presented a classification of the toponymic lexis according to the structural level allowing for a detailed analysis of the collected toponymic factual material. Derivational analysis of the Crimean toponymic units is performed. Structural types of toponyms are examined, statistic data on the ways of formation and the frequency of use of different word-formation patterns is provided. As illustrative material, the author offers existing geographical names of the Crimea. In the result of the structural analysis the identified toponymic objects of the Crimean region have been systemized according to the specified criteria, monobasic, compound, and complex toponyms being singled out, the quantitative composition of the groups of geographical nominations has been provided, as well as the explanation of the obtained results.
Keywords: toponym, toponymic unit, word formation, derivational pattern, method of word formation, structural type
References:
1. Gorlanova I. B. Toponimiya goroda Kostromy (struktura, semantika i funktsionirovaniye v sinkhronno-diakhronnom aspekte) [Toponymy of the city of Kostroma (structure, semantics, and functioning in the synchronic-diachronic aspect)]. Yaroslavl’, 2006. 20 p. (in Russian).
2. Evseyeva O. S. Toponimiya Smolensko-Vitebskogo prigranich’ya: strukturno-semanticheskiy aspekt [Toponymy of the Smolensk-Vitebsk borderline: structural-semantic aspect]. Smolensk, 2015. 22 p. (in Russian).
3. Zhuchkevich V. A. Obshchaya toponimika [General toponymics]. Minsk, Vysheysh. shkola Publ., 1968. 432 p. (in Russian).
4. Semushkin V. A. Gidronimiya Srednego Dona: nominatsionnyy i slovoobrazovatel’nyy aspekty [Hydronymics of the Middle Don: the nominative and derivational aspects]. Voronezh, 2000. 20 p. (in Russian).
5. Superanskaya A. V. Obshchaya teoriya imeni sobstvennogo [General theory of the proper name]. Moscow, Nauka Publ., 1973. 366 p. (in Russian).
6. Hisametdinova R. F. Toponimy i ikh derivaty v yazykovoy sisteme (na materiale nemetskogo i russkogo yazykov) [Toponyms and their derivatives in the language system (on the material of the German and Russian languages)]. Ufa, 2000. 126 p. (in Russian).
7. Superanskaya A. V. Teoreticheskiye problemy onomastiki [Theoretical problems of onomastics]. Leningrad, 1974. 48 p. (in Russian).
8. Yazyk Zemli. Istoricheskaya toponimiya Kryma. Slovar’-spravochnik. Tom І. Sost. Dzh. Chelebiev, A. V. Superanskaya [The Language of the land. Historical toponymy of the Crimea. Reference dictionary-book. Tom І. Dzh. Chelebiev, A. V. Superanskaya]. Simferopol’, Krymuchpedgiz Publ., 2008. 408 p. (in Russian).
9. Yazyk Zemli. Istoricheskaya toponimiya Kryma. Slovar’-spravochnik. Tom ІІ. Sost. Dzh. Chelebiev [The Language of the land. Historical toponymy of the Crimea. Reference dictionary-book. Tom ІІ. Dzh. Chelebiev]. Simferopol’, Krymuchpedgiz Publ., 2009. 460 p. (in Russian).
10. Krym istoricheskiy. Toponimika Kryma: toponimicheskaya karta [Historical Crimea. Toponymics of the Crimea: toponymic map]. Simferopol’, Soyuzkarta Publ., 2008 (in Russian).
Issue: 3, 2017
Series of issue: Issue 3
Rubric: CURRENT ISSUES OF RUSSIAN STUDIES AND CULTURAL LINGUISTICS
Pages: 88 — 93
Downloads: 957