USING DEBATE IN ENVIRONMENTAL TRAINING OF BACHELORS OF BUILDING
Russian federal state educational standards direct at creating common cultural and professional competences, which can be formed only be using active teaching methods. In this connection it is important to identify those that are most effective in environmental training of technical universities’ students. The article summarizes the positive experience of the using debate in teaching natural and physical sciences. Skills, formed with the participation of students in the debate, are revealed. Thus, participation in the debate develops the ability to analyze information, the ability to prepare oral speech, willingness to work in a team. The article presents the rules of debate and describes the teacher’s and students’ stages of preparation for the debate. The article includes methodical receptions and examples of practical training using this method in Tomsk State University of Architecture and Building. There are some difficulties of students encountered in the work: the inability to articulate main idea, inability to debate, the arguments put forward.
Keywords: debate, environmental training of engineers, active learning method, competences, psychological testing
References:
1. Suslov A. B. Osobennosti obrazovatel’nykh tekhnologiy dlya grazhdanskogo obrazovaniya [Characters of education technologies for citizenship education]. Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo pedagogicheskogo universiteta – TSPU Bulletin, 2012, vol. 11 (126), pp. 142–148 (in Russian).
2. Tolstova O. S. Vozmozhnosti interaktivnykh metodov obucheniya, ispol’zuemykh v SShA, v peredache chetyrekh elementov soderzhaniya obrazovaniya [The potentials of the interactive teaching methods used in the USA in the delivering four elements of the content of education]. Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo pedagogicheskogo universiteta – TSPU Bulletin, 2009, vol. 4 (82), pp. 18–22 (in Russian).
3. Debaty: uchebno-metodicheskiy komplekt [Debate: teaching kit]. Moscow, Bonfi Publ., 2001. 296 p. (in Russian).
4. Ryzhova S. V. Debaty v protsesse obucheniya’ [The debate in the learning process]. Vestnik Buryatskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta – Buryat State University Bulletin, 2010, no. 1, pp. 136–139 (in Russian).
5. Shchebel’skaya E. G. Metod debatov v osnove razvitiya inoyazychnoy kommunikativnoy kompetentsii v sisteme dopolnitel’nogo professional’nogo obrazovaniya [The method of debate at the heart of the development of foreign language communicative competence in system of additional vocational training]. Mir nauki, kul’tury, obrazovaniya – The World of Science, Culture, Education, 2014, no. 2 (45), pp. 42–46 (in Russian).
6. Sun’ Ley. Debaty kak innovatsionnaya obrazovatel’naya tekhnologiya [The debate as an innovative educational technology]. Vyssheye obrazovaniye v Rossii – Higher Education in Russia, 2012, no. 12, pp. 145–146 (in Russian).
7. Petrova L. S. Debaty v obuchenii uravneniyam matematicheskoy fi ziki studentov-teploenergetikov [Debate in teaching power system students’ to the equations of mathematical physics]. Omskiy nauchnyy vestnik – Omsk Scientifi c Bulletin, 2011, no. 5 (101), pp. 219–222 (in Russian).
8. Kharvi-Smit N. Metodicheskoye posobiye po vedeniyu debatov v Britanskom / Vsemirnom parlamentskom formate [Tool to conduct a debate in the British / World Parliamentary format]. New-York, London, Amsterdam, IDEA Publ., 2012. 208 р. (in Russian).
9. Snider A. Many Sides: Debate across curriculum. N. Y., IDEA, 2002. 281 p.
10. Kompetentsii v obrazovanii: opyt proektirovaniya: sb. nauch. tr. [Competencies in education: e xperience design. Collection of scientifi c papers]. Ed. A. V. Khutorskoy. Moscow, 2007. 327 р. (in Russian).
11. Rumbeshta E. A. Monitoring dostizheniy uchashchikhsya po fi zike kak sostavnaya chast’ obrazovatel’nogo protsessa profi l’noy shkoly [The monitoring of academic achievements of schoolchildren in physics as part of the educational process of profi le schools]. Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo pedagogicheskogo universiteta – TSPU Bulletin, 2013, vol. 4 (132), pp. 46–50 (in Russian).
( 419.62 kB ) 
( 413.39 kB )
Issue: 1, 2016
Series of issue: Issue 1
Rubric: PROFESSIONAL READINESS OF THE SPECIALIST
Pages: 51 — 56
Downloads: 756