THE USE OF INTERDISCIPLINARY APPROACH IN THE ORGANIZATION OF CURRICULAR AND EXTRACURRICULAR ACTIVITIES IN THE MODERN SCHOOL
Discusses the one of the important directions of development of Russian education – transition to second generation of Federal State Education Standard. The priorities of the new standard are not only aimed at subject results, but also at meta-subject and personal results. The demands of the modern society set the following task: to make high school graduates to be ready to cope with challenges of the modern world, and to face a variety of cognitive, communicative and organizational problems. The modern teacher in perfection must possess innovative pedagogical technologies and approaches in the educational process. Implementation of the interdisciplinary approach at every educational subject, as well as in the organization of extracurricular activities reveals to the teacher and learners new horizons of dialogue, cooperation, development of creative and intellectual thinking, the organization of cognitive activity and so on.
Keywords: the transition to second generation of Federal State Education Standard, substantive result, metasubject result, transdisciplinary approach, integration, curricular activities, extracurricular activities, teacher
References:
1. Federal’nyy gosudarstvennyy obrazovatelnyy standart [Federal state educational standard]. Ofi tsial’nyy resurs Ministerstva obrazovaniya i nauki Rossiyskoy Federatsii [Offi cial site of the Ministry of education and science of the Russian Federation]/URL: http://минобрнауки.рф/документы/922/файл/748/ФГОС_НОО.pdf (accessed 21.01.2015) (in Russian).
2. Vesnina L. V. Tendentsii izmeneniy v sovremennom obrazovanii [Trends in modern education]. Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo pedagogicheskogo universiteta – TSPU Bulletin, 2010, vol. 2 (92), pp. 17–23 (in Russian).
3. Gromiko N. V. Obucheniye skhematizatsii: sb. stsenariev dlya provedeniya urokov i treningov: uchebno-metodicheskoye posobiye dlya uchashchikhsya 10–11 klassov [Training of schematization: a Collection of scripts for lessons and training. Textbook for students of 10–11 grades]. Moscow, 2005 (in Russian).
4. Khutorskoy A. V. Metapredmetnoye soderzhaniye i rezultaty obrazovaniya: kak realizovat’ federalniye gosudarstvenniye obrazovatelniye standarti FGOS [Interdisciplinary content and outcomes of education: how to implement the Federal state educational standards FSES]. Internet-zhurnal “Eidos” – The Internet-magazine “Eidos”, 2012, no. 1. URL: http://www.eidos.ru/journal/2012/0229-10.htm (data obrashcheniya 21.01.2015) (in Russian).
5. Khutorskoy A. V. Evristicheskiy tip obrazovaniya: rezultaty nauchno-prakticheskogo issledovaniya [Heuristic type of education: the results of scientifi c and practical research]. Pedagogika – Pedagogics, 1999, no. 7, pp. 15–22 (in Russian).
6. Lebedev O. E. Kompetentnostniy podkhod v obrazovanii [Competence approach in education]. Shkolnye tekhnologii – School of Technology, 2004, no. 5, pp. 3–12 (in Russian).
7. Vostokova E. V. Integratsiya urochnykh i vneurochnykh form obucheniya [Integration of curricular and extracurricular forms of training]. Integratsiya obrazovaniya – Integration of Education, 2004, no. 2, pp. 77–86 (in Russian).
8. Mukushev B. A. Otrazheniye idey sinergetiki v soderzhanii shkol’nogo estestvenno-nauchnogo obrazovaniya [The refl ection of the ideas of synergetics in the content of school science education]. Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo pedagogicheskogo universiteta – TSPU Bulletin, 2010, vol. 2 (92), pp. 93–97 (in Russian).
9. Rudakova O. A. Realizatsiya metapredmetnogo podkhoda v prepodavanii geografi i [The implementation of interdisciplinary approach in the teaching of geography]. Sozdaniye effektivnoy obrazovatel’noy sredy shkoly s uchetom sovremennykh trebovaniy FGOS: Materialy III Vserossiyskogo nauchno-prakticheskogo simpoziuma (Seversk, 25–27 marta 2014 g.) [Creating an effective educational environment of the school to meet modern requirements of the FSES: proceedings of the III all – Russian scientifi c-practical Symposium]. Ed. by E. N. Mikhailov. Tomsk, Izd-vo TSPU Publ., 2014. Pp. 37–41 (in Russian).
10. Gayvoronskaya A. V. Pedagogicheskiye usloviya razvitiya dialoga v sovmestnoy deyatel’nosti [Pedagogical conditions of development of dialogue in joint activity]. Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo pedagogicheskogo universiteta – TSPU Bulletin, 2014, vol. 10 (151), pp. 198–201 (in Russian).
11. Gromyko N. V. Metapredmetniy podkhod v obrazovanii pri realizatsii novykh obrazovatelnykh standartov [Interdisciplinary approach in education with the implementation of new educational standards]. URL: balaxta.ru›biblioteka/ug/metapredmet_podhod.doc (accessed 21.01.2015) (in Russian).
12. Protasova I. V. Pedagogicheskoye obespecheniye protsessa nakopleniya uchaschimisya sotsial’nogo opyta v usloviyakh shkoly-gimnazii: dis. kand. ped. nauk [Pedagogical support of the process of accumulation by students of social experience in terms of grammar school: thesis of cand. ped.sci.]. Kostroma, 2001. 235 p. (in Russian).
13. Valkova G., Zaynullina F., Shteinberg V. Logiko-smyslovye modeli – didakticheskaya mnogomernaya tekhnologiya [Logiko-semantic model – didactic multidimensional technology]. Direktor shkoly – School Principal, 2009, no. 1, pp. 49–54 (in Russian).
14. Fomenko I. A. Sozdaniye sistemi formirovaniya novogo soderzhaniya obrazovaniya na osnove printsipov metapredmetnosti [The creation of a system of formation of the new curriculum based on the principles of metasubject approach]. URL: http://www.bestreferat.ru/referat-188083.html (accessed 21.01.2015) (in Russian).
( 771.84 kB ) 
( 709.82 kB )
Issue: 8, 2015
Series of issue: Issue 8
Rubric: GENERAL EDUCATION
Pages: 36 — 42
Downloads: 935