TYPES OF DISCOURSE MARKERS IN RUSSIAN AND ENGLISH RESEARCH PAPERS ON GEOLOGY, OIL AND GAS INDUSTRY
This paper presents an investigation of the discourse markers, the analysis of which is based on the data of the magazines in Russian and English, such as FUEL, Oil and Gas, Drilling and Oil, Oil and Gas Business. The work gains currency because of the increased interest in the field of the functioning of the discourse markers – the lingual units, which play a major role in the formation of a coherent discourse. The study shows the differences in the distribution of the discourse markers in Russian and English papers on Geology, Oil and Gas Industry. It also helps to identify some of the possible reasons behind these differences, which can be both of linguistic and extralinguistic nature.
Keywords: discourse, discourse markers, scientific style, written communication
References:
1. Babayan V. N., Kruglova S. L. Teoriya diskursa v sisteme nauk o yazyke [Discourse theory in the science system about language]. Yaroslavskiy pedagogicheskiy vestnik – Yaroslavl’ pedagogical bulletin, 2002, issue 3. URL http://vestnik.yspu.org/releases/novye_Issledovaniy/17_9/(in Russian).
2. Bolsunovskaya L. M., Didenko A. V. Diskursologiya: analiz teoreticheskikh podkhodov k issledovaniyu diskursa [Discourse: analysis of theoretical methods applied to discourse study]. Vestinik Zabaykalskogo gisudarstvennogo universiteta – Zabaykalsk state university bulletin, 2010, issue 7, pp. 39–44 (in Russian).
3. Kogut S. V. Diskursivnye markery kak otrazhenie svoeobraziya estestvenno-nauchnoy i nauchno-gumanitarnoy kartin mira [Discourse markers as the reflection of science and human worldview]. Filologicheskie nauki: voprosy teorii i praktiki – Philological sciences. Issues of theory and practice, 2014, vol. 10 (40), issue 1, pp. 101–106 (in Russian).
4. Makarov M. L. Osnovy teorii diskursa [The foundations of discourse theory]. Moscow: ITDGK “Gnozis” Publ., 2003. 252 p. (in Russian).
5. Nikolaeva T. M. Kratkiy slovar’ terminov lingvistiki teksta [A dictionary of linguistic terms]. Novoe v zarubezhnoy lingvistike [New in a foreign linguistics]. Issue 8. (Text linguistics). Moscow: Progress Publ., 1978. Pp. 5–42. (in Russian).
6. Van Deyk T. K opredeleniyu diskursa [Discourse definition]. URL http://psyberlink.flogiston.ru/internet/bits/vandijk2.htm (in Russian).
7. Benvenist E. Obshchaya lingvistika [General linguistics]. 3d edition. Moscow: Editorial URSS Publ., 2009. 448 p. (in Russian).
8. Zvegintsev V. A. O tsel’nooformlennosti edinits teksta [About continuity of text units]. Izvestiya AN SSSR – Bulletin of AS USSSR. Moscow, Nauka Publ., 1980, vol. 39, issue 1, pp. 13–21 (in Russian).
9. Emmer Yu. A. Prazdnichnyi diskurs: kognitivno-diskursivnoe issledovanie [Holiday discourse: cognitive and discourse investigation]. Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo pedagogicheskogo universiteta – TSPU Bulletin, 2011, no. 4 (16), pp. 53–68 (in Russian).
10. Karasik V. I. O tipach diskursa [About discourse types]. Yazykovaya lichnost’: institutsional’nyi i personal’nyi diskurs [Language personality: institutional and personal discourse]. Volgograd, Peremena Publ., 2000. Pp. 5–20 (in Russian).
11. Shiffrin D. Discourse markers. Cambridge University press, 1987. P. 15–17.
12. Halliday, M. A. K., Hasan R. Cohesion in English. London: Longman, 1976. 374 p.
13. Massalina I. P., Novodranova V. F. Diskursivnye markery v angliyskom yazyke voenno-morskogo dela [Discourse markers in navy in English] Kaliningrad: FGOU VPO “KGTU”, 2009. 278 p. (in Russian).
14. Gubareva O. N. Sopostavitel’nyy analiz metadiskursivnoy organizatsii angloyazychnykh i russkoyazychnykh nauchno-uchebnykh tekstov po economike: avtoref. dis. ... kand. filol. nauk [Comparative analysis of metadiscourse organization of English and Russian scientific economic texts. Abstract of thesis candidate of philol. sci.] Moscow, 2011. 25 p. (in Russian).
15. Kogut S. V. Diskursivnye markerу v russkoyazychnykh i nemetskoyazychnykh geologicheskikh nauchnykh stat’yakh [Discourse markers in Russian and English scientific papers on geology]. Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo pedagogicheskogo universiteta – TSPU Bulletin, 2014, no. 380, pp. 18–23 (in Russian)
16. Wierzbicka A. Cross-cultural pragmatics. The semantics of human interaction. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 1991. 497 p.
17. Diskursivnye slova russkogo yazyka: opyt kontekstno-semanticheskogo opisaniya [Discourse words in Russian: experience of context and semantic description]. Ed. K. Kiseleva and D. Payara. Moscow, Metatekst Publ., 1998. 448 p. (in Russian).
18. McCarthy M. Discourse analysis for language teachers. Cambridge: University press Publ., 1991. 213 p.
19. Frazer B. An approach to discourse markers. Journal of Pragmatics, 1990, no. 14, pp. 386–387.
20. Proshchenkova N. V. Natsional’naya spetsifika semantiki slova v blizkorodstvennykh yazykakh: na material imen sushchestvitel’nykh russkogo i ukrainskogo yazykov: dis. ... kand. filol. nauk [National specificity of word semantics in sister languages: a case study of Russian and Ukrainian nouns. Abstract of thesis candidate of philol. sci.]. Blagoveshchensk, 2008. 270 p. (in Russian)
21. Shakirov A. A., Tyncherov K. T., Goryunova M. V. Razvitie geofizicheskogo kompleksa gidrodinamicheskikh issledovaniy kollektorov [Development of geophysical complex of collector hydrodynamic investigation]. Elektronnyy nauchnyy zhurnal “Neftegazovoe delo” – Online scientific journal Oil and Gas Business. Ufa, UGNTU Publ., 2013, issue 6, pp. 126–158 (in Russian).
22. Slyusarev N. I., Muhametshin G. R. Fiziko-khimicheskoe initsiirovanie termicheskogo vozdeystviya na plast pri dobyche vysokovyazkikh neftey [Physic and chemical initiation of heat treatment at highly viscous oil development]. Elektronnyy nauchnyy zhurnal “Neftegazovoe delo” – Online scientific journal Oil and Gas Business. Ufa: UGNTU, 2013, issue 6, pp. 180–192 (in Russian).
23. Goronovich S. N., Kozhina T. V., Oleynikov A. N., Semenov V. I. Burovye rastvory pri stroitel’stve poiskovoy skvazhiny № 1-P struktury Shakhrinav (Respubika Tadzhikistan) [Drill fluid in prospect well construction (Republic of Tajikistan)]. Spetsializirovanny zhurnal “Burenie I neft’” – Special journal Drilling and oil, 2014, issue 4, pp. 36–39 (in Russian).
24. Pescherenko M. P., Perel’man O. M., Rabinovich A. I., Kaplan A. L. Povyshenie effektivnosti ekspluatatsii UETSN putem primeneniya mul’tifaznukh nasosov [Efficiency upgrading of ESP production run by the use of multiphase pumps]. Spetsializirovanny zhurnal “Burenie I neft’” – Special journal Drilling and oil, 2014, issue 4, pp. 56–60 (in Russian).
25. Stratieva D., Shishkova I., Dinkova R., Nikolovab R., Mitkovab M., Stanulovc K., Sharped R., Russelld C. A., Obryvalinae A., Telyasheva R.. Reactivity and stability of vacuum residual oils in their thermal conversion. Fuel, Vol. 123, May 2014. P. 133–142.
26. Stefanos Tsiakmakis, Dimitrios Mertzis, Athanasios Dimaratos, Zisimos Toumasatos, Zissis Samaras. Experimental study of combustion in a spark ignition engine operating with producer gas from various biomass feedstocks. Fuel. Vol. 122, April 2014, pp. 126–139.
27. Khan Tawassul, McGuire Sofia. Napping subsueface fractures using their elastic nonlinear response. Oil and gas journal. Oct. 11, 2004, Рp. 32–37.
28. Ivan Catalin, Bloys Benjamin, Fleming Carole, Piper William. New resource-management approaches targets long-term liability of drilling wastes. Oil and gas journal. Oct. 11, 2004, pp. 42–47.
29. Blaizot Marc. Arctic may reveal more hydrocarbons as shrinking ice provides access. Oil and gas journal. Nov. 2, 2011, pp. 48–54.
30. Hachaturyan E. V. Semantika i sintaktika diskursivnykh slov glagol’nogo proiskhozhdeniya v sovremennom ital’yanskom yazyke: dis. ... kand. filol. nauk [Semantics and syntactic of discourse markers of verbal origin. Thesis candidate of philol. sci.] Moscow, 2000. 171 p. (in Russian).
31. Teun A. van Dijk, Walter Kintsch. Strategies of Discourse Comprehension. New York. 1983. 418 p.
Issue: 4, 2015
Series of issue: Issue 4
Rubric: ACTUAL PROBLEMS OF COGNITIVE AND DISCURSIVE LINGUISTICS
Pages: 117 — 123
Downloads: 918