THE FUNCTIONAL STATUS OF CONTEMPORARY LOANWORDS IN THE SPEECH OF A GROUP-WIDE LANGUAGE PERSONALITY OF HIGHER EDUCATION INSTITUTION STUDENT
The work is devoted to one of the central notions of anthropological linguistics – group-wide language personality. The article considers one of the particular features of contemporary loanwords – vocabulary borrowed from foreign languages which entered the Russian language in XX–XXI centuries, in the speech of a group-wide language personality of higher education institution student of Tomsk. Central attention is focused on the realization of a group of nominative functions by foreign novations in student discourse. The youth newspapers, Internet websites of social communities, colloquial speech of students was chosen as the material for investigation. Multifunctionality of contemporary loanwords in student newspaper and Internet discourse is revealed – the nominative function is basic and is realized in specific linguistic functions. For foreign novations the most typical functions are information and determinative, synonymically differential, terminological and compressive. The role of loanwords in the formation of a language personality of a student: contemporary loanwords expand the terminological thesaurus of a future specialist, it is a cognition means in information technologies and household appliances, in the sphere of various interests of students.
Keywords: borrowings, functioning, higher school student’s group linguistic identity, Internet-discourse
References:
1. Shchitova O. G., Savilova S. L. Higher school student’s group linguistic identity: typical features. Philological sciences. Theory and practice issues. Tambov, Gramota Publ., 2014. № 3 (33): in 2 volumes. Vol. 1. Pp. 206–209 (in Russian).
2. Karaulov Yu. N. The Russian language and linguistic identity. Moscow, LKI Publ., 2010. 264 p. (in Russian).
3. Ivantsova E. V. On the term “linguistic identity”: origins, problems, prospects of using. Tomsk State University Bulletin. Philology. 2010, no. 4 (12), pp. 24–32. URL: http://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/o-termine-yazykovaya-lichnost-istoki-problemy-perspektivy-ispolzovaniya (Accessed: 25 March 2014) (in Russian).
4. Shchitova O. G. Lexicographical sources of studying foreign novations functional equivalence in the Russian language of the beginning of the XXI c. Tomsk State University Bulletin, 2012, no. 355, pp. 27–30. URL: http://sun.tsu.ru/mminfo/000063105/355/image/355–027.pdf (Accessed: 13 March 2014) (in Russian).
5. Shchitova O. G. The newest borrowings in the Russian speech of XXI c.: to the defi nition of a concept. Siberian Journal of Science. Philology. Pedagogy. Tomsk, Publishing house of Tomsk Polytechnical University, 2012, no. 1 (2), pp. 278–286. URL: http://sjs.tpu.ru/journal/article/view/237/234 (Accessed: 25 March 2014) (in Russian).
6. UniverCITY. Tomsk: Youth Home. № 4, 10.03.2010. 16 p. (in Russian).
7. UniverCITY. Tomsk: Youth Home. № 3, 27.02.2010. 16 p. (in Russian).
8. UniverCITY. Tomsk: Youth Home. № 5, 13.03.2010. 16 p. (in Russian).
9. UniverCITY. Tomsk: Youth Home. № 9, 10.04.2011. 16 p. (in Russian).
10. UniverCITY. Tomsk: Youth Home. № 2, 20.02.2010. 16 p. (in Russian).
11. Timirgaleeva A. R. Specialities of the process of borrowing German lexis into the Russian language of the latest period. Philological sciences. Theory and practice issues. Tambov, Gramota Publ., 2013. № 8 (26): in 2 volumes. Vol. 1. Pp. 161–163 (in Russian).
12. Buler К. Language theory. Мoscow, Progress Publ., 2001. 504 p. (in Russian).
13. Yakobson R. О. Linguistics and poetics. Structuralism: pro et contra. Мoscow, Progress Publ., 1975. Pp. 193–230 (in Russian).
14. Slyusareva N. А. Language functions. Linguistics. Big encyclopedia. Head editor V. N. Yartseva. Мoscow, Bol’shaya Rossiyskaya Entsiklopedia Publ., 1998. Pp. 564–565 (in Russian).
15. Krongauz М. А. Semantics: Textbook for students of higher school linguistic faculties. Мoscow, Akademia Publ., 2005. 352 p. (in Russian).
16. Dyakov А. I. Derivational integration of Anglicisms in the Russian language of the end of the XX c. in the functional aspect. Dis. cand. philol. sci. Novosibirsk, 2001. 291 p. URL: http://topreferat.znate.ru/docs/index-45868.html (Accessed: 25 March 2014) (in Russian).
17. Bogoslovskaya V. R. Anglicisms in Russian sport linguoculturology of the XX c. Dis. cand. philol. sci. Volgograd, 2003. 183 p. URL: http://www.twirpx.com/fi le/774673/ (Accessed: 25 March 2014) (in Russian).
18. Shchitova O. G., Samsonova E. S. Informative potential of ergonyms borrowed from the foreign language. Tomsk State Pedagogical University Bulletin, 2012, no. 1 (116), pp. 175–181. URL: http://vestnik.tspu.ru/fi les/PDF/articles/samsonova_e._s._175_181_1_116_2012.pdf (Accessed: 7 January 2014) (in Russian).
( 439.76 kB ) 
( 433.46 kB )
Issue: 10, 2014
Series of issue: Issue 10
Rubric: ACTUAL PROBLEMS OF COGNITIVE AND DISCOURSE LINGUISTICS
Pages: 184 — 188
Downloads: 979