INTERTEXTUALITY AS A CATEGORY OF THE TEXT AND AS A METHOD OF THE VIOLATION OF ITS INTEGRITY (BY THE EXAMPLE OF THE GERMAN LANGUAGE)
The article deals with the conception of intertextuality as a category of the text and as a method of the violation of its structure. The paper analyzes the peculiarities and the causes of usage of this stylistic device in the artistic text by the example of the novel by A. Dцblin “Berlin Alexanderplatz”. The key role of intertextuality in the montage technique is elicited and proved in works by authors of the postmodernism period. In the present article it is also taken an attempt to give a clear definition of this linguistic phenomenon and related terms, to mark forms of expression and degrees of markedness of intertextuality on different levels. It is proved that its identification and understanding in the text depends on the background knowledge of the reader.
Keywords: intertextuality, artistic text, violation of the structure, stylistic device, montage
References:
1. Kristeva Yu. Bakhtin, Word, Dialogue and Novel. Moscow University Bulletin, 1995, no. 1., pp. 97–124 (in Russian).
2. Vater H. Einfьhrung in die Textlinguistik: Struktur und Verstehen von Texten. Mьnchen: Fink, 2001. 221 S.
3. Chernyavskaya V. E. Intertext and Interdiscourse as a Realisation of Text Openness. Issues of Cognitive Linguistics, 2004, no. 1, pp. 106–115 (in Russian).
4. Bazhenova E. A. Intertextuality. Stylistic Encyclopedic Dictionary of Russian. Moscow, Flinta: Nauka Publ., 2003. Pp. 104–108 (in Russian).
5. Tsyrenova A. B. On the Category of Modality and the Author’s Intention (Data of English). Tomsk State Pedagogical University Bulletin, 2011, no. 3, pp. 93–97 (in Russian).
6. Pasko Yu.V. The Linguistic Representation of Intertextuality in the artistic text (as exemplifi ed by the novel by E. Yelinek “The Piano Teacher”). Abstract of thesis candidate of philol. sci. Moscow, 2011. 17 p. (in Russian).
7. Bart R. Selected works: S emiotics: Poetics. Moscow, Progress Publ., 1989. 616 p. (in Russian).
8. Mozheyko M. A. Intertextuality. Postmodernism: encyclopedia. Minsk, Interpress-Servis Publ., 2001. Pp. 333–335 (in Russian).
9. Fateeva N. A. Intertext in the World of Texts. Counterpoint of Intertextuality. Moscow, KomKniga Publ., 2006. 280 p. (in Russian).
10. Volkov I. V. Intertextuality and Parody in Works by John Bart. Dis. cand. philol. sci. Rostov on Don, 2006. 224 p. (in Russian).
11. Shipova I. A. Linguistic Parametrs of Montage Technique in the Prose of H. Bцll. Linguistic readings. Cycle 7. Materials of Research and Practical Conference. Perm’, 2011. Pp. 148–151 (in Russian).
12. Dцblin, Alfred. Berlin Alexanderplatz. Mьnchen: Deutscher Taschenbuch Verlag GmbH & Co. KG, 2008. 464 S.
13. Fokkema D. W. The semantic and syntactic organisation of postmodernist texts. Approaching postmodernism. Ed. by D. W. Fokkema, H. Bertens. Amsterdam; Philadelphia, 1986. P. 81–98.
( 422.54 kB ) 
( 416.44 kB )
Issue: 10, 2014
Series of issue: Issue 10
Rubric: GERMANIC AND ROMANIC LANGUAGES
Pages: 24 — 28
Downloads: 895